Interest of justice vacatur
New York court grants vacatur of default judgment in no-fault insurance case where claim was barred by res judicata, demonstrating interests of justice standard.
Interest of justice vacatur — Read Article →In-depth legal analysis from Attorney Jason Tenenbaum — covering court rulings, legal standards, and practical guidance on defaults under New York law.
Expert Analysis
Default judgments arise when a party fails to answer, appear, or respond within required time limits. Vacating a default under CPLR 5015 requires showing a reasonable excuse for the failure and a meritorious defense or cause of action. In no-fault practice, defaults occur frequently in arbitration and court proceedings, and the standards for granting and vacating defaults have generated substantial case law. These articles analyze default practice, restoration motions, and the circumstances under which courts excuse procedural failures.
Read Our Defaults Articles
Frequently Asked Questions
A default occurs when a party fails to respond to a legal action within the required time frame — for example, failing to answer a complaint within 20 or 30 days of service under CPLR 320. When a defendant defaults, the plaintiff can seek a default judgment under CPLR 3215. However, a defaulting party can move to vacate the default under CPLR 5015(a) by showing a reasonable excuse for the delay and a meritorious defense to the action.
Courts evaluate reasonable excuse on a case-by-case basis. Accepted excuses can include law office failure (under certain circumstances), illness, lack of actual notice of the proceeding, or excusable neglect. However, mere neglect or carelessness is generally insufficient. The movant must also demonstrate a meritorious defense — meaning they have a viable defense to the underlying claim that warrants a determination on the merits.
New York court grants vacatur of default judgment in no-fault insurance case where claim was barred by res judicata, demonstrating interests of justice standard.
Interest of justice vacatur — Read Article →
Learn about inquest procedures in NY default judgment cases, including damage assessment rules and cross-examination requirements for witness testimony.
Inquests — Read Article →
Court rules that vague "law office failure" excuse doesn't justify late opposition papers, but defendants still failed to prove their summary judgment case.
Improvident to examine papers — Read Article →
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum analyzes a questionable court decision regarding notice requirements for default judgment motions when defendants have already defaulted.
Motion for leave to enter a default insufficient — Read Article →
Court upholds default judgment against GEICO despite wrong index number on timely answer in no-fault insurance case, creating concerning precedent for technical defects.
Absolutely horrible decision — Read Article →Need Legal Guidance?
Get a Free Case Evaluation
No fees unless we win. Available 24/7.
Court accepts calendar service failure as reasonable excuse for default, allowing plaintiff to vacate summary judgment when attorney never received briefing schedule notification.
Calendar service did not transmit the adjournment stipulation — Read Article →
Court takes judicial notice of permanent stay order in no-fault insurance case, rendering declaratory judgment appeal academic under NY law.
DJ following a default — Read Article →
Court denies motion to vacate default judgment when plaintiff fails to demonstrate meritorious defense, despite questions about reasonable excuse for the default.
More Defaults — Read Article →
Settlement of default judgments in NY: five days notice required when defendant previously appeared. Court jurisdiction and CPLR 3215 requirements explained.
Settlement of a default judgment — Read Article →
Learn how NY courts handle default judgments when defendants claim insurance delays. Expert analysis of Shy v Shavin Corp case. Call 516-750-0595 for consultation.
New York Default Judgment Laws: When Insurance Delays Don’t Excuse Missing Court Deadlines — Read Article →
Learn how CPLR 5015(a)(1) allows setting aside default judgments in NY personal injury cases. Expert guidance on reasonable excuse, meritorious defense requirements. Call...
CPLR 5015(a)(1) in New York Personal Injury Cases: Setting Aside Default Judgments — Read Article →
New York's Second Department outlines when law office failure constitutes excusable conduct for missing court appearances in this mortgage foreclosure case.
Law Office Failure — Read Article →
Learn why DFS does not approve improper EUO disclaimer practices in NY no-fault insurance. Expert legal analysis from experienced Long Island lawyers. Call 516-750-0595.
Understanding New York No-Fault Insurance EUO Requirements: Why DFS Does Not Approve Improper Disclaimers — Read Article →
Learn trial de novo default judgment requirements in NY no-fault insurance cases. Essential procedural guidance. Call 516-750-0595 for legal help.
Trial De Novo Default Judgment NY – No-Fault Insurance Requirements — Read Article →
New York courts handle default judgment applications differently by region, with upstate requiring ex-parte motions while downstate uses notice procedures.
Another way to take a default — Read Article →
Court rules plaintiff's failure to enter default judgment within one year of calendar default constitutes abandonment under CPLR 3215(c), dismissing no-fault case.
A new caveat on the one year period to enter a judgment — Read Article →
Two NY court cases examine reasonable excuse requirements for opening defaults in no-fault insurance litigation, highlighting challenges defendants face.
Where was the reasonable excuse? — Read Article →
Court ruling demonstrates strict standards for vacating trial defaults, requiring parties to show valid excuses for non-appearance and prompt action to remedy defaults.
Guideposts to vacate a trial default — Read Article →
First Department ruling creates conflict over whether meritorious defense affidavits are required when seeking to vacate default judgments in New York courts.
Meritorious defense not needed — Read Article →
Court requires "detailed and credible" explanation for law office failure when seeking to vacate default judgment, as demonstrated in Premier Surgical Services case.
"Detailed and Credible" Explanation for the default — Read Article →
MVAIC fails to vacate default judgment due to lack of reasonable excuse and meritorious defense in New York no-fault insurance case with compound interest.
An appeal that really went nowhere — Read Article →
Court denies motion to vacate no-fault insurance default judgment where provider's attorney cited heavy workload as excuse, ruling mere neglect insufficient under CPLR 5015.
Defaults… — Read Article →
New York court ruling on proper service requirements for foreign LLCs under LLC Law sections 304 and 307, including Secretary of State delivery and direct notice procedures.
Service! — Read Article →
CPLR 2004 motion for time extension in civil litigation - Court considers delay length, prejudice, and good cause factors in New York cases.
CPLR 2004 offers some relief to the dreaded Civil Kings motion stip — Read Article →
New York appellate court ruling on amendment to pleadings and res judicata defense in no-fault insurance case, analyzing default judgment procedures.
The DJ as to the provider that never was — Read Article →
New York court rules two consecutive errors by insurance claims examiner - failing to forward summons and default motion - disallow default judgment vacatur despite reasonable...
2 consecutive error disallow default vacatur — Read Article →
NY court reinstates default judgment on technicality despite defendant's motion, highlighting critical procedural requirements for vacating defaults under CPLR 5015(a).
Default reinstated on utter technicality — Read Article →
Court case examining insurance company's failure to demonstrate meritorious defense when vacating default judgment due to accident date discrepancy in no-fault claim.
Court addresses lack of meritorious defense and fails to evaluate reasonable excuse — Read Article →
Court ruling clarifies when failure to oppose venue change motions creates appealable default orders in New York civil procedure.
Was there opposition to the default motion? — Read Article →
Court ruled that defendants cannot claim reasonable excuse for default when they received notice of motion for default judgment, despite insurance carrier's failure to respond.
Interesting decision on insurance carrier fauilure — Read Article →
Appellate Term case where attorney disputed consent order despite court notation, resulting in unsuccessful appeal of $500 no-fault insurance claim in Civil Court Kings County.
It really was not on consent again — Read Article →
Analysis of CPLR 3215(f) default judgment requirements in NY no-fault subrogation cases, examining procedural differences between Civil and District Courts.
Defaults 3215(f) – what does it mean? — Read Article →
Court rejects law firm's reasonable excuse claim for default, finding pattern of neglect that constitutes serious lack of attention to case progress.
Reasonable excuse not upheld — Read Article →
Court analyzes briefing schedule defaults in no-fault insurance case, examining law office failure excuses and CPLR 5015 requirements for opening defaults.
The famous briefing schedule — Read Article →
First Dept. ruling expands definition of "rejected" answers, allowing default motions within 15 days to effectively reject untimely responses in litigation.
Answer rejected through subsequent motion for default — Read Article →
Global Liberty Ins. Co. v W. Joseph Gorum case analysis: court grants default but denies summary judgment on medical necessity peer review signature issues.
Default granted but summary judgment motion denied — Read Article →
First Department rules that failure to regularly check email in e-filed cases can constitute reasonable excuse for vacating defaults, emphasizing particularized explanations.
Failure to check e-mail in e-filed case is a reasonable excuse to a default — Read Article →
First Department reverses vacatur of default judgment due to insurer's inadequate excuse for two-year delay and lack of personal knowledge of office procedures.
Default – First Department reverses vacatur of the judgment — Read Article →
Court case analyzing default judgment after late opposition papers, examining Civil Kings briefing schedule adherence and prejudice standards in NY courts.
The Civil Kings briefing schedule — Read Article →
Analysis of military affidavit requirements for default judgments in NY courts, discussing jurisdictional defects and OCA reform proposals for streamlined procedures.
Defaults – required military affidavit (Maybe OCA can do something?) — Read Article →
New York appellate court upholds trial court's decision to vacate defendant's default judgment based on reasonable excuse for failing to timely respond to petition.
IDS? — Read Article →
First Department court excuses plaintiff's failure to enter default judgment within one year in no-fault benefits case, highlighting inconsistent standards across NY departments.
Failure to enter a default excused — Read Article →
Court rules Kings County Clerk lacked authority to enter clerk's judgment on settlement stipulation requiring notice and unspecified amount under CPLR 3215(i)(1).
Entering judgment on a settlement – not what you thought — Read Article →
Appeals court upholds default judgment against defendants who failed to comply with discovery order in State Farm no-fault insurance case, requiring reasonable excuse and...
Default judgment upheld — Read Article →
New York appellate court upholds dismissal when attorney calendared conference dates incorrectly twice, ruling repeated calendar errors don't constitute reasonable excuse.
A two strike rule on Law Office Failure — Read Article →
Court vacates default judgment due to insufficient proof under CPLR 3215, requiring personal knowledge affidavits and verified complaints for proper establishment.
Default judgment vacated — Read Article →
Appellate court corrects trial court's dismissal with prejudice ruling in mortgage foreclosure case, emphasizing proper application of procedural dismissal standards.
The dismissal should have been without prejudice — Read Article →
Court case analysis of CPLR 308(2) service requirements showing successful traverse of default judgment based on improper mailing to wrong address despite valid personal service.
CPLR 308(2) in action – the successful traverse — Read Article →
Court rules that making a timely default judgment application protects plaintiffs from CPLR 3215(c) dismissal, even if the application ultimately fails.
Dismissal for failure to take a default itself failed — Read Article →
Analysis of Paulus v Christopher Vacirca ruling on CPLR 3215(g)(1) notice requirements for default judgments when defendants have appeared in NY actions.
Defaults – the right to notice — Read Article →
Court grants vacatur of default judgment when plaintiff's counsel misrepresented defendant's address for service, establishing new precedent under CPLR 5015(a)(3).
Misrepresentation based upon failure to serve last known address — Read Article →
Court rejects attorney's heavy workload as excuse for missing deadline, emphasizing that mere neglect cannot justify vacating default orders in legal proceedings.
Excusable neglect not acceptable — Read Article →
Court finds that failure to stipulate to adjournment can constitute law office failure, providing grounds to vacate summary judgment entered on default.
Failure to stipulate to an adjournment can be law office failure – sufficient to vacate a summary judgment loss on default — Read Article →
Court case analysis on CPLR 317 defense for defendants who didn't receive proper notice of summons, exploring alternatives to CPLR 5015 for vacating defaults.
It is not 5015 but 317 — Read Article →
Court accepts law office failure as valid excuse for missing conference when defendants provide detailed, credible explanation for miscommunication between attorneys.
Valid excuse for law Office Failure — Read Article →
First Department demonstrates lenient approach to vacating default judgments based on law office failure, contrasting with Second Department's stricter stance on defaults.
Default granted where answer is 6 months later — Read Article →
New York's CPLR 3215(c) requires dismissal when plaintiffs fail to seek default judgment within one year, as demonstrated in Acupuncture Works v NYC Transit case.
Abandoned (3215[c]) — Read Article →
First Department case analysis showing factors courts consider when vacating defaults, including reasonable excuse requirements and service issues in NY litigation.
Vacatur of the default granted — Read Article →
Court grants extension to answer despite weak law office failure excuse. Attorney questions plaintiff's strategy of pursuing default instead of summary judgment.
Default not granted and a questionable appeal — Read Article →
NY court rules that dismissal for failure to appear at conference should be without prejudice, not with prejudice, as it's not a determination on the merits.
Failure to appear may not result in dismissal with prejudice — Read Article →
NY court vacates default judgment using inherent discretionary power when plaintiff failed to move for default within one year, demonstrating Woodson theory application.
Failure to enter default within one year allows vacatur of default under a Woodson theory — Read Article →
Court's inherent power to vacate default judgments in NY personal injury cases - Gurin v Pogge demonstrates when intentional defaults may be excused for substantial justice.
An intentional default excused based upon court’s inherent power to vacate defaults — Read Article →
New York court confirms that parties seeking to vacate default orders under CPLR 5015(a)(1) must prove their motion was filed within the one-year deadline.
Movant bears burden to show that application to vacate default under 5015(a)(1) was timely made — Read Article →
Court of Appeals rules CPLR 3215(f) violations are procedural errors, not jurisdictional defects, allowing correction via CPLR 5015 motions rather than nullifying judgments.
Failure to comply with 3215(f) is not jurisdictional — Read Article →
Court case analysis where defendant's motion to renew and reargue was denied after defaulting on no-fault insurance summary judgment opposition papers.
Shell game — Read Article →
Kings County Civil Court case shows CPLR service rules should prevail over local briefing schedules when no prejudice exists in no-fault insurance litigation.
Service of papers in accordance with the CPLR should be considered even if not in accordance with the Kings County Civil Court briefing schedules — Read Article →
Appeals court reverses district court decision allowing oral default applications, emphasizing proper motion procedures are required under CPLR 2214.
District Suffolk reversed – Oral applications to vacate a default are not appropriate — Read Article →
New York's First Department shows leniency in vacating default judgments when law office failures are excusable and no prejudice exists to the opposing party.
Why take a default in the First Department? — Read Article →
Court conditionally grants default judgment despite plaintiff's failure to meet CPLR 3215(f) requirements for verified complaint and proper affidavit support.
Default judgment conditionally granted — Read Article →
MVAIC's repeated failed attempts to vacate default judgments highlight the futility of raising the same meritless arguments on appeal in no-fault insurance cases.
Give it up MVAIC — Read Article →
NY court ruling that settlement negotiations constitute reasonable excuse for delay under CPLR 3012(d) and 5015(a)(1), protecting defendants from default judgments.
Settlement negotiations constitute a reasonable execuse under 3012(d) and 5015(a)(1) by implication — Read Article →
Learn how CPLR 312-a service defects can destroy your case. Expert guidance on service of process requirements for healthcare providers in New York.
CPLR 312-a service was not properly effected: complaint dismissed — Read Article →
Law office failure case where First Department found excuse reasonable for restoring dismissed no-fault action despite paralegal's misunderstanding of case status on court website.
More excusable law office failure — Read Article →
NY Court reverses dismissal for attorney's failure to appear, ruling law office failure due to family health crisis was excusable under CPLR 2005
This was excusable law office failure — Read Article →
Appellate Term Second Department cases on insurance default judgments, law office failure excuses, and CPLR 2004 extensions in New York no-fault litigation.
Is it really the public policy of this state to adjudicate cases on their merits? Ask the Appellate Term, Second Department. — Read Article →
Learn the proper mechanism to vacate summary judgment granted on default through CPLR 5015(a) motions vs renewal motions in NY no-fault insurance cases.
The proper mecanism to vacate a motion for summary judgment granted on default is through 5015(a) — Read Article →
New York court rules on vacating default judgments based on intrinsic fraud - defendant must show reasonable excuse for default under CPLR 5015(a)(3).
Party seeking to vacate a default based upon intrinsic fraud must demonstrate a reasonable excuse — Read Article →
NY courts increasingly require movants seeking default judgments to provide summary judgment-level proof. Appellate Division case analysis on rear-end collision presumptions.
Defaults again — Read Article →
Court reverses default judgment denial in no-fault insurance case, highlighting CPLR 3215(f) requirements and business records foundation issues in New York.
Another doozy of a default decision — Read Article →
Expert analysis of successful CPLR 317 motion to vacate default judgment in New York. Learn how proper legal strategy defeated challenging default in Second Department.
Default vacated on CPLR 317 grounds — Read Article →
Learn why default judgments in NY declaratory judgment actions require non-hearsay evidence. Expert analysis of CPLR 3215 requirements from experienced attorneys.
Default Judgment Pitfalls: Why Non-Hearsay Evidence Is Critical in New York Declaratory Judgment Actions — Read Article →
Learn NY requirements for affidavits of non-receipt to vacate default judgments in personal injury cases. Expert CPLR guidance. Call 516-750-0595
Affidavits of Non-Receipt and Default Judgment Procedures in NY Personal Injury Cases — Read Article →
Learn why NY courts require detailed law office failure excuses for default relief. Expert analysis of Second vs First Department standards. Call 516-750-0595.
Why Law Office Failure Excuses Must Be Detailed to Open Default Judgments in NY — Read Article →
Analysis of NY appellate court ruling on law office failure as good cause to open defaults, examining regional variations and procedural requirements.
Generalized Averment of Law Office Failure is Sufficient to Open a Default: A Comprehensive Analysis — Read Article →
Learn when New York courts will grant motion adjournments and the consequences of appearing unprepared. Expert legal guidance for Nassau & Suffolk County cases.
Motion Return Date Adjournments in New York Courts – Expert Legal Guidance — Read Article →
Learn why New York attorneys must demonstrate procedural compliance when seeking to vacate defaults based on law office failure in Nassau and Suffolk County courts.
If you detail a procedure, you must make sure you demonstrate that it was followed — Read Article →
Understand the complex implications of default judgments in NY no-fault cases. Learn strategic defense approaches and collateral estoppel consequences.
A default that is more than meets the eyes — Read Article →
Expert analysis of excusable claims office failures in NY no-fault insurance law. Long Island & NYC legal guidance for administrative mistakes. Call 516-750-0595.
Claims Office Failures: When Administrative Mistakes Are Excusable Under NY Law — Read Article →
New York medical malpractice expert testimony foundation requirements. Learn critical standards for expert witness preparation in Nassau and Suffolk County cases.
Understanding Foundation Requirements in Medical Malpractice Expert Testimony — Read Article →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes detailed legal analysis on defaults and related topics as part of an ongoing commitment to legal education and transparency. Since 2008, Attorney Tenenbaum has written over 2,353 articles examining how New York courts decide cases involving personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and complex litigation matters. Each article is based on an actual court decision and provides the kind of substantive analysis that practitioners and clients need to understand the current state of the law.
Attorney Tenenbaum brings over 24 years of New York litigation experience to every article. His practice spans Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He has handled thousands of cases involving insurance disputes, personal injury claims, and employment law matters, giving him a practical perspective that academic commentators often lack. The articles in this collection reflect that experience, offering readers insight into how judges actually apply legal standards in contested cases.
If you are dealing with a legal issue related to defaults or any topic covered on this blog, the firm offers free initial consultations by phone or in person. Call (516) 750-0595 to speak with an attorney, or visit the contact page to submit a case review request online. No fee is charged unless the firm recovers compensation on your behalf. The firm's six attorneys bring over 112 combined years of legal experience and speak English, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Russian, ensuring clients can communicate in the language they are most comfortable with. Attorney Tenenbaum is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts, and he has authored more than 2,353 published legal articles that attorneys, judges, and insurance professionals across the state rely on for guidance.
New York's legal framework for defaults matters involves an intricate web of statutes, regulations, and case law that has developed over decades. The state's court system — including the Civil Court, District Courts, Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals — each plays a distinct role in shaping how defaults cases are litigated and decided. Trial-level decisions in Nassau County Supreme Court, Suffolk County Supreme Court, and the New York City Civil Courts establish important factual precedents, while appellate rulings create binding legal standards that all lower courts must follow.
The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs procedure in New York civil litigation and contains provisions that directly impact defaults cases. CPLR Article 31 establishes the scope and methods of disclosure, including depositions under CPLR 3107, interrogatories under CPLR 3130, and document demands under CPLR 3120. CPLR 3212 provides the standard for summary judgment, requiring the movant to establish a prima facie case through admissible evidence and shifting the burden to the opponent to raise a triable issue of fact. CPLR 3215 governs default judgments, which require proof of service, proof of the facts constituting the claim, and proof of the amount due. Understanding these procedural tools is essential for anyone involved in defaults litigation in New York.
Statutes of limitations vary significantly depending on the type of claim. General negligence and personal injury claims carry a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5). Medical malpractice claims have a shortened two-and-a-half-year deadline under CPLR 214-a. Claims against municipalities require a Notice of Claim within 90 days under General Municipal Law Section 50-e. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including the 30-day filing window for applications and the 45-day submission period for provider claims. Employment discrimination claims under the New York State Human Rights Law generally have a three-year statute of limitations, while federal Title VII claims require EEOC filing within 300 days.
The Appellate Term and Appellate Division regularly issue decisions that clarify and refine the legal standards applicable to defaults cases. The Second Department, which covers Long Island and parts of New York City, is particularly active in this area. Its decisions on evidentiary standards, burden-shifting frameworks, and procedural requirements directly affect how trial courts evaluate motions and how attorneys prepare their cases. Attorney Tenenbaum monitors these decisions and analyzes them in the articles on this page, providing practitioners with the timely legal commentary they need to stay current.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. is located at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746, centrally situated on Long Island to serve clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. With over 24 years of experience and more than 1,000 appeals written, Attorney Tenenbaum combines deep legal knowledge with practical courtroom experience. If you need help with a defaults matter, call (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Successful outcomes in defaults cases often depend on procedural compliance as much as substantive merit. In no-fault insurance litigation, the prima facie case standard requires the plaintiff to submit admissible evidence establishing the claim was properly submitted, overdue, and unpaid. If the defendant raises a defense — such as an IME no-show, EUO non-appearance, lack of medical necessity, or fee schedule dispute — the burden shifts to the plaintiff to present evidence creating a triable issue of fact. Summary judgment motions under CPLR 3212 require the movant to make a prima facie showing through affidavits, deposition testimony, or documentary evidence, and the opposition must raise a genuine factual dispute to avoid dismissal.
In personal injury cases, the discovery process is governed by CPLR Article 31 and involves depositions of parties and witnesses, exchange of medical records under CPLR 3121 authorizations, physical and mental examinations, and expert disclosure. Once discovery is complete, either party may file a note of issue certifying readiness for trial, after which a 120-day deadline applies for filing summary judgment motions under CPLR 3212(a). Motion practice often determines the outcome of cases before trial, and understanding the specific evidentiary standards applied by courts in your jurisdiction is essential. The articles on this page analyze these standards in detail, drawing on real cases litigated by Attorney Tenenbaum and decisions from courts across the state.
The firm serves clients throughout Long Island, including the towns and villages of Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, and Massapequa, as well as all five boroughs of New York City. Attorney Tenenbaum regularly appears in Nassau County Supreme Court, Suffolk County Supreme Court, the New York City Civil Court, the American Arbitration Association, the Workers' Compensation Board, and the Appellate Term and Appellate Division of the Second Department. If you need legal assistance with a defaults matter or any topic discussed in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential case evaluation.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. was founded in 2002 and has grown into one of Long Island's most respected personal injury, employment law, and insurance litigation firms. The firm's six attorneys — led by founding partner Jason Tenenbaum — bring over 112 combined years of legal experience to every case. The team speaks English, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Russian, ensuring that clients from diverse backgrounds can communicate in the language they are most comfortable with during what is often one of the most stressful periods of their lives.
Attorney Tenenbaum earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law and is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York. He has written more than 1,000 appellate briefs, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million in verdicts and settlements for injured individuals and workers throughout Long Island and New York City. His 2,353+ published legal articles on New York case law make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state, and his analysis is relied upon by attorneys, judges, and insurance professionals across all four Appellate Division departments.
The firm operates on a contingency fee basis for personal injury and employment discrimination cases, which means clients pay no attorney fees unless the firm recovers compensation on their behalf. Every consultation is free, confidential, and without obligation. The firm's centrally located Huntington Station office provides convenient access to Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts in Central Islip, and the New York City Civil Court. Whether you need help with a car accident claim, a workplace discrimination complaint, a no-fault insurance denial, a workers' compensation dispute, or any other legal matter, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. is ready to fight for your rights.
Questions About Defaults?
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has been writing about defaults since 2008, drawing on 24+ years of practice. Get a free, confidential case evaluation.
No fees unless we win · Available 24/7 · Hablamos Español
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.