CPLR 312-a service was not properly effected: complaint dismissed

If you were injured due to someone else’s careless actions, we understand the challenges you may be facing. As a victim or a surviving family member, you could be dealing with the life-altering consequences of a serious accident.

Gateway Med., P.C. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50336(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)

“The record reveals that an acknowledgment of receipt was never signed by defendant and returned to plaintiff. “If the acknowledgment of receipt is not mailed or returned to the sender, the sender is required to effect personal service in another manner” (Dominguez v Stimpson Mfg. Corp., 207 AD2d 375 [1994]; see also Patterson v Balaquiot, 188 AD2d 275 [1992]). Plaintiffs did not effect service in another manner. Accordingly, the service was defective and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted.”

I just put in an answer and write a summary judgment motion.  I do not see the utility in playing this game, especially since 312-a service, unless acknowledged, cannot lead to a clerk’s judgment.  This seems silly.

I also think 312-a allows for costs if service has to be done through traditional Article 3 or Ins. Law 1212 methods.  I wonder if those costs would include Respondent’s appellate brief?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Print

Latest Article

DON'T ACCEPT LESS THAN WHAT YOU'RE OWED!

Choosing the right legal representation is one of the most critical decisions you can make after an accident.

Partnering with a skilled, experienced, and dedicated personal injury attorney can bolster your case and position you to secure the full financial compensation you’re entitled to.

Our firm is ready to manage every aspect of your case, including negotiations with insurance companies. We reject inadequate settlement offers and relentlessly fight for the maximum compensation you rightfully deserve.

Contact Us – We’re Here to Help


    5-Star Rating on Google