Key Takeaway
Unique Physical Rehab vacated a preclusion order entered during an appellate stay. The opinion distinguished inherent authority from jurisdictional relief.
This article is part of our ongoing defaults coverage, with 90 published articles analyzing defaults issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
A preclusion order was entered while an appellate stay remained in effect. In Unique Physical Rehab v Global Liberty, decided April 16, 2021, the Appellate Term vacated that order in the interests of substantial justice. It rejected the insurer’s separate argument that the stay violation deprived the court of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Last reviewed: September 2026.
Historical note: Unique Physical Rehab (April 16, 2021) concerned a specific appellate stay that remained in force. Its inherent-authority ruling should not be substituted for the separate jurisdictional ground in CPLR 5015(a)(4).
The stay had not expired automatically
The October 2016 stay order said the court could vacate the stay if the appeal was not perfected by January 6, 2017. It did not make the stay end automatically on that date. The Civil Court clerk’s failure to file the return prevented timely perfection, and the stay was not vacated until October 18, 2019. The January 2018 preclusion order therefore intervened while the stay remained in force.
Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win
Does this apply to your situation?
Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.
The insurer had not opposed the preclusion motion. The Appellate Term said there was no opposition to reargue or renew, but granted the alternative request for vacatur. It found enough information in the Civil Court file to establish the stay and denied the preclusion motion.
CPLR 5015(a)(4) addresses lack of jurisdiction. This stay violation did not establish that ground. The relief granted instead rested on the court’s inherent authority and the particular record. The opinion does not decide that every kind of stay has identical consequences.
The earlier severance request concerned CPLR 603, which permits severance or separate trials for convenience or to avoid prejudice. The 2021 appeal did not resolve the merits of that earlier request. Jason’s optimism about electronic filing below was commentary, not an appellate finding that records could no longer go missing.
Jason’s original comment
Jason’s April 2021 comments follow unchanged. His predictions about electronic filing and remote calendars, and his comparison with Florida, are historical observations rather than findings in the opinion.
Three observations. With the new record on appeal system, this should never happened again. Second, why isn’t Civil Court an e-file court yet? It is 2021. Florida became an e-file court system wide in 2012. Third, I enjoy the 5015(a)(4) v. inherent jurisdiction distinction. I believed that violating a court order was void under (a)(4). Apparently, we learn that is not the case.
Fourth, this probably will not happen in the zoom, controlled calendar environment.
Connect to the Encyclopedia
Start with the default judgments and vacatur topic hub.
- IDS v Metro Health: nonreceipt and documentary defenses
- Li Xian: corporate-service addresses and misrepresentation
- Farrell Forwarding: conference dismissal without prejudice
- Naber Electric: an explained late answer before judgment
For review of a particular default, service issue or court order, contact the firm.
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.
About This Topic
Default Judgments in New York Practice
Default judgments arise when a party fails to answer, appear, or respond within required time limits. Vacating a default under CPLR 5015 requires showing a reasonable excuse for the failure and a meritorious defense or cause of action. In no-fault practice, defaults occur frequently in arbitration and court proceedings, and the standards for granting and vacating defaults have generated substantial case law. These articles analyze default practice, restoration motions, and the circumstances under which courts excuse procedural failures.
90 published articles in Defaults
Keep Reading
More Defaults Analysis
Interest of justice vacatur
New York court grants vacatur of default judgment in no-fault insurance case where claim was barred by res judicata, demonstrating interests of justice standard.
Mar 17, 2021
Inquests
Castaldini ordered a new damages inquest after a physician's statement was admitted without cross-examination. Liability was not reopened.
Sep 25, 2020
The proper mecanism to vacate a motion for summary judgment granted on default is through 5015(a)
Learn the proper mechanism to vacate summary judgment granted on default through CPLR 5015(a) motions vs renewal motions in NY no-fault insurance cases.
Oct 18, 2010
New York Default Judgment Laws: When Insurance Delays Don’t Excuse Missing Court Deadlines
Shy v Shavin: the missing proof that an insurer received the lawsuit before default, why later delay did not help, and the CPLR 5015 timing distinction.
Aug 4, 2019
It really was not on consent again
Appellate Term case where attorney disputed consent order despite court notation, resulting in unsuccessful appeal of $500 no-fault insurance claim in Civil Court Kings County.
May 6, 2017
Excusable neglect not acceptable
A.B. Medical's workload explanation and unexplained delay failed on its vacatur motion. The 2015 decision did not create a ten-month filing deadline.
Mar 19, 2015Frequently Asked Questions
Common Questions About This Topic
5 answers from the firm's New York personal-injury and employment-law practice. Click any question to expand.
What happens when a Civil Court issues a preclusion order while a stay is in effect?
In Unique Physical Rehab, the specific appellate stay remained in force. The court vacated the preclusion order in the interests of substantial justice, while rejecting the claim that this stay violation defeated subject-matter jurisdiction.
Can a party seek reargument or renewal of a motion that was granted unopposed?
Unique Physical Rehab rejected reargument and renewal because the insurer had not opposed the earlier motion. The court instead granted its alternative request for vacatur. The decision should not be reduced to a rule about every possible renewal application.
What is CPLR 603 severance and when is it used in no-fault insurance cases?
CPLR 603 permits severance or separate trials for convenience or to avoid prejudice. The insurer's earlier severance request was part of the procedural history; this appeal resolved the later preclusion order, not the merits of severance.
How has electronic filing improved appellate procedures in New York courts?
Jason's 2021 comment expressed hope that electronic records and remote calendars would prevent a repeat. The opinion did not measure improvements or find that electronic filing eliminates lost records. Its holding concerned a stay still in effect.
What is the difference between CPLR 5015(a)(4) and vacatur based on inherent jurisdiction?
CPLR 5015(a)(4) addresses lack of jurisdiction to render an order or judgment. Unique Physical Rehab rejected that ground for this stay violation but granted relief under inherent authority on the record before it.
Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a defaults matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
