Verification Requests
Verification requests, response evidence and denial timing. Chapa (2026) rejected a mandatory 150-day denial deadline; it did not make unanswered claims automatically withdrawn. The hub links 83 historical notes.
87 articles from 2008–2026 · 1 current · 67 reviewed case notes · by Jason Tenenbaum
Start here
The explainer for this topic. Read it first; the articles below go deeper on single issues.
How the firm handles these matters
Reviewed case notes by year
Notes on decisions from earlier years that the firm has re-read against current law. Each note states when it was last reviewed and what has changed since.
2019
- The 120-day rule
- No-Fault Insurance Additional Verification: Complete Guide for New York Providers
- Who Bears the Burden of Proving Verification Compliance at a No-Fault Trial?
- The first citing of 65-3.5(p) – somewhat ominous
- Outstanding Verification Trials: New York No-Fault Insurance Defense Guide
- Understanding Verification Requirements in No-Fault Insurance Claims: When the Denial Can Wait
- Another Verification
- Verification, again
2018
2017
- Partial response to verification insufficient
- Non responded to verification fatal to plaintiff’s case
- First sighting of 120-day rule
- Additional Verification non-receipt
- Trial de-novo win where carrier did not respond to verification objection letter and wins.
- Additional Verification in No-Fault: What Counts as a Proper Response (Excel Surgery v Fiduciary)
- The feigned verification response does not slice it – a break from the law as certain arbitrators construe it
- The By-Report
2016
2015
- Verification Affidavits and the Mailing Presumption: Compas Med. v Praetorian
- Another less than valid verification compliance affidavit suffices
- Do you really believe that the verification was mailed? I don’t
- A verification non receipt decision that does not make sense.
- Additional verification not produced is probative of nothing
- Time frame to deny following EUO
- Allowing non-sense to continue
- Boilerplate affidavit mandates triable issue of fact on verification issue
- Non receipt and verification
- They did not act in good faith
2014
2013
- Evidence insufficient to prove that provider complied with verification request
- Amended motion/Admissible Reply papers/Defects in affidavits/delay letter vs. verification requests
- Additional Verification non-receipt and lack of medical necessity.
- Additional Verification
- IME no show and tolling
- Another verification again
- Navigating New York No-Fault Additional Verification Challenges: Long Island Healthcare Providers
2011
- Conclusory statement that the bill was not received is insufficient to stave off summary judgment
- My AIG bail out money at work
- The Verification Process in No-Fault Insurance: When Technical Requirements Override Common Sense
- Insurance Verification Requests: Be Careful What You Ask For | Long Island No-Fault Attorney
- EUO letter need not be in large font – ADA litigation here we come
- Verification Timing in No-Fault Claims: When Bills Are Properly Delayed
- Understanding New York No-Fault Insurance Verification Timing: When 30 + 10 + 5 = Timely
2010
- The EIP does NOT need to be notified when the carrier is seeking verification from a provider of medical services
- The failure to respond to ALL of the requested verification renders lawsuit premature
- How did you know that you never received the requested verification?
- Procedural Fairness in No-Fault Insurance Litigation: Is It Fair? | Long Island & NYC Legal Analysis
- Defense of unbundling requires coding expert affidavit
2009
Older archive
Case notes as they were written at the time. They have not been re-checked against later decisions, so treat them as history and confirm the current rule before relying on one.
2020 (3)
2017 (1)
2015 (3)
2013 (4)
2010 (3)
Frequently asked questions
What is additional verification in no-fault insurance?
Additional verification is information the insurer requests to establish proof of claim beyond the prescribed forms. The insurer must forward the prescribed verification forms within 10 business days after receiving the application, and must request any additional verification within 15 business days of receiving the completed forms (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(a), (b)). A claim is not overdue until 30 calendar days after the insurer receives proof of claim, which includes the verification it requested (11 NYCRR 65-3.8(a)(1)), so a proper request delays the pay-or-deny deadline. Insurers may not demand verification without good reasons (11 NYCRR 65-3.2(c)), and an insurer's missed time frame does not excuse you from complying (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(p)).
How long does an insurer have to request additional verification?
Fifteen business days from receipt of the completed prescribed verification forms (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(b)). The prescribed forms themselves must be sent within 10 business days after the application (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(a)). If the verification is not supplied within 30 calendar days after the request, the insurer must follow up within 10 calendar days (11 NYCRR 65-3.6(b)). A late request is not ignored: each deviation from these rules reduces the insurer's 30 calendar days to pay or deny (11 NYCRR 65-3.8(l); Nyack Hosp. v General Motors Acceptance Corp., 8 NY3d 294 (2007)), and the applicant must still comply with the request (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(p)).
What types of additional verification can a no-fault insurer request?
The regulation does not list categories; it entitles the insurer to receive all items necessary to verify the claim directly from the parties from whom verification is requested (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(c)). In practice requests cover medical records and reports, wage verification from the employer (NF-6) or self-employment income proof (NF-7), an authorization for medical records, and the original assignment (11 NYCRR 65-3.4(c); 11 NYCRR 65-3.11(c)). An examination under oath requires specific objective justification, and a medical examination must be scheduled within 30 calendar days (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(d), (e)). Insurers may not demand verification without good reasons (11 NYCRR 65-3.2(c)).
What happens if I don't respond to a no-fault verification request?*
You must supply, within 120 calendar days from the date of the initial request, all requested verification under your control or possession, or written proof providing reasonable justification for not complying (11 NYCRR 65-3.5(o)); the request must warn you of that deadline. After 120 days the insurer may deny the claim; it is not deemed denied automatically (11 NYCRR 65-3.8(b)(3)). The rule does not apply to prescribed NF forms, medical examination requests or examination under oath requests. Law changed April 1, 2013: 11 NYCRR 65-3.5(o) applies to treatment rendered on or after that date; earlier claims follow the prior rules.
* The law on this point has changed. The answer states the change, its effective date, and which claims the earlier rule still governs. Answers reviewed against the statutes and decisions in force as of September 2026.