IME no-show is a policy defense triggering the hourly attorney fee provision
Kamara Supplies v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 192 AD3d 588 (1st Dept. 2021) I find it offensive that a regulation states that an attorney should work
Kamara Supplies v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 192 AD3d 588 (1st Dept. 2021) I find it offensive that a regulation states that an attorney should work
Domny Med. Servs., P.C. v Universal Ins. Co., 2021 NY Slip Op 50301(U) “Defendant does not deny that it issued the insurance policy pursuant to which
Murzik Taxi, Inc. v Lutheran Med. Ctr., 2021 NY Slip Op 02302 (2d Dept. 2011) This case is is a an interesting loss for the Medallions
Alleviation Med. Servs., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2021 NY Slip Op 08159 (2d Dept. 2021) (1) “The defendant appeals, and we affirm, albeit on different
Jean-Philippe, Matter of, v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 2020 NY Slip Op 51511(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) ” To the extent petitioner contends that her submission
S.O.V. Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 51365(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “In support of its motion, defendant alleged
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs.; Lyonel F. Paul M.D. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 51379(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “The papers submitted by defendant
JPF Med. Servs., P.C. v Nationwide Ins., 2020 NY Slip Op 51122(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) ” Here, defendant failed to demonstrate, as a matter of law,
Monroe v Omni Indem. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 50731(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the affidavit of defendant’s litigation representative was sufficient
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v Ho Suk Shin, 2020 NY Slip Op 02469 (2d Dept. 2020) The insured removed his vehicle from the policy.
Kamara Supplies v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 50414(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2000) The holding is simple. If the “policy issue” is not
Matter of Ameriprise Ins. Co. v Kensington Radiology Group, P.C., 2020 NY Slip Op 00500 (1st Dept. 2020) “Respondent contends that its claims were complete before
Actual Chiropractic, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y., 2020 NY Slip Op 50185(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “On the instant appeal, defendant has annexed
I usually do not focus or discuss too many MVAIC cases, mainly because they do not terribly interest me and the Second Department has held that
Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v MVAIC, 2019 NY Slip Op 51618(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” Since MVAIC established that there had been no timely filing
JJ & R Chiropractic PC v MVAIC, 2019 NY Slip Op 51559(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2019) ” [d]efendant MVAIC failed in its burden to establish, prima
Metro Psychological Servs., P.C. v Travelers Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 51150(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) “Defendant proffered sufficient evidence to support
North Val. Med., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50904(U)(2d Dept. 2019) This one was interesting. (1) “A review of the record indicates
TAM Med. Supply Corp. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51779(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “In support of its cross motion, defendant submitted affidavits by
Matter of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v Bay Needle Acupuncture, P.C.2018 NY Slip Op 08238 (1st Dept. 2018) This was an interesting case that discusses the distinction