92 articles by Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
Appellate Division holds insurers need not issue a denial when a medical provider or injured person fails to respond to verification demands within 120 days. Analysis of Chapa Prods. v MVAIC (2026).
Read More →
New York court ruling demonstrates how healthcare providers can lose no-fault claims due to verification failures and fee schedule violations in insurance disputes.
Read More →
Analysis of Blackman v Nationwide Ins. case addressing verification affidavit mailing presumptions and fee schedule defense preservation requirements in NY no-fault law.
Read More →
Court ruling clarifies timing requirements for second EUO scheduling letters in no-fault insurance cases, emphasizing strict compliance with regulatory deadlines.
Read More →
Learn NY no-fault insurance 150-day verification rule. Expert analysis of Chapa decision & claim timing requirements. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
Expert guide to NY no-fault insurance additional verification requirements. Learn compliance strategies and legal protections. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
New York no-fault case clarifies burden of proof in additional verification disputes, showing how procedural missteps can doom otherwise valid claims.
Read More →
First court citing of NY regulation 65-3.5(p) creates ominous legal conflicts with existing no-fault insurance verification and IME timing requirements.
Read More →
Master verification trial procedures in NY no-fault insurance. Expert analysis of burden of proof & defense strategies. Call 516-750-0595 for help.
Read More →
Learn how no-fault insurance verification requirements can delay claim denials. Expert legal analysis of the Parisien decision and EUO timing rules. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
Learn about no-fault insurance verification requirements in New York. Expert analysis of Orthoplus decision and compliance strategies. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
New Horizon Surgical case analysis: Court dismisses no-fault claim when plaintiff's affidavit failed to include requested informed consent form despite claiming full compliance.
Read More →
Insurance companies use verification requests to delay no-fault benefits. Learn your rights regarding verification mailing, responses & dispute tactics. Call 516-750-0595
Read More →
Court ruling shows affidavit alone can create triable issue on verification receipt despite 120-day rule, prompting questions about documentary evidence standards.
Read More →
Court case analysis showing how the 120-day rule for no-fault insurance verification demands has been weakened, allowing claims to proceed despite procedural issues.
Read More →
Court ruling establishes that late follow-up EUO scheduling letters void claim denials, creating split with other decisions on no-fault insurance timing requirements.
Read More →
Court clarifies delay letter requirements under 11 NYCRR 65-3.6(b), ruling insurers only must notify attorneys when seeking verification from third parties, not plaintiffs.
Read More →
Analysis of Atlantic Radiology v Travelers case addressing verification request failures and timing issues in NY no-fault insurance claims litigation.
Read More →
New York no-fault case shows partial response to verification requests is insufficient - providers must fully comply or risk premature dismissal of benefits claims.
Read More →
Court rules that partial responses to verification requests render no-fault insurance claims premature, emphasizing the critical importance of complete compliance with verification requirements.
Read More →
TAM Med. Supply Corp. case introduces new questions about timing requirements for 120-day denials in New York no-fault insurance disputes.
Read More →
Court rules that no-fault insurer's 30-day payment period doesn't start until they actually receive requested verification documents, even if provider claims they were sent.
Read More →
Trial de-novo win where no-fault carrier failed to respond to verification objection letter, highlighting communication requirements in NY insurance claims.
Read More →
Court ruling shows healthcare providers must specifically address verification requests rather than making general statements about not possessing records.
Read More →
NY court rules vague hospital verification responses insufficient for no-fault insurance claims. St. Barnabas v GEICO case analysis on verification requirements.
Read More →
Judge Ciaffa's verification requirements affirmed: NY court rules insurers must send verification requests to claimants, not attorneys, under no-fault regulations.
Read More →
Analysis of Bronx Acupuncture v Hereford case clarifying that by-report codes are verification issues, not automatic denials in NY no-fault insurance claims.
Read More →
Allstate v. Longevity Medical Supply case analysis - court confirms master arbitrator award despite wrong mailing address argument under NY No-Fault law
Read More →
Multiple 2016 New York appellate cases highlight ongoing disputes over insurance companies' claims of receiving additional verification requests in no-fault insurance disputes.
Read More →
A no-fault insurance case where inadequate affidavits led to defeat, highlighting the importance of learning from legal mistakes and improving documentation strategies.
Read More →
Court rules partial response to verification requests insufficient, requiring complete verification before claim payment or denial under NY no-fault law.
Read More →
Insurance carriers can successfully deny no-fault claims when patients fail to appear for scheduled IMEs, provided proper procedures are followed for verification requests.
Read More →
Court ruling shows how healthcare providers can overcome insurance company claims of non-receipt of verification documents through proper affidavits and evidence.
Read More →
Long Island no-fault attorney criticizes Appellate Term's handling of Rybak verification affidavit cases, calling for proper proof standards in summary judgment motions.
Read More →
Jason Tenenbaum critiques Appellate Term's flawed reasoning in Compas Med. v Praetorian, where court accepted insufficient verification affidavit evidence in no-fault case.
Read More →
New York court clarifies that generic delay letters don't toll statutory payment deadlines—only specific verification requests can extend an insurer's time to pay or deny claims.
Read More →
New York court accepts inadequate verification compliance affidavit despite lack of specific details about mailing dates and contents in no-fault insurance case.
Read More →
Court ruling shows how medical providers can counter insurance company claims of non-receipt through proper affidavit evidence in no-fault verification disputes.
Read More →
Court decision analysis reveals flawed verification non-receipt ruling where affidavit failed to specify mailed items or dates, creating questionable precedent.
Read More →
Court denies plaintiff's motion in no-fault case due to failed verification compliance and assignor's failure to appear for required IMEs and EUOs.
Read More →
Court ruling establishes that additional verification not produced proves nothing in no-fault insurance claims, addressing verification requests and IME/EUO requirements.
Read More →
Court ruling on no-fault insurance verification requests and EUO scheduling - insurer's timely mailing vs plaintiff's non-receipt and no-show defenses.
Read More →
New York no-fault insurance case: Time limits for claim denials after examination under oath (EUO). Court rules on 30-day deadline requirements.
Read More →
Court allows bare "I responded to verification" affidavit to defeat summary judgment motion, despite no actual verification documents being submitted as evidence.
Read More →
NY appellate court decisions create triable issues of fact with boilerplate affidavits claiming verification materials were mailed to insurance carriers.
Read More →
Court ruling on non-receipt denials and verification requirements in NY no-fault insurance claims, including burden of proof standards for medical providers.
Read More →
Court rules Allstate failed to act in good faith regarding additional verification requests in NY no-fault insurance case, affirming arbitrator's award.
Read More →
NY court upholds verification defense in no-fault insurance case, ruling defendant need not prove verification letters weren't tampered with per Schozer precedent.
Read More →
New York Central Mutual tied up in Sound Shore case again - analysis of verification requests and procedural issues in no-fault insurance claims dispute between Mount Sinai Hospital and insurer.
Read More →
Court ruling on verification request mailing requirements in NY no-fault insurance claims, establishing that delivery to USPS completes the request process.
Read More →
Court victory for insurer after patient's IME no-show, featuring American Transit citations and analysis of denial rights in New York no-fault cases.
Read More →
Court ruling shows defendant raised triable issue of fact on 30-day denial period through additional verification timing, shifting burden from carriers.
Read More →
Mount Sinai v Dust Tr. case analysis: verification requests sent before receiving NF-5 forms don't toll the 30-day payment period under NY no-fault law.
Read More →
New York no-fault case: E4 Services v Lincoln General - court rules denial of receipt alone insufficient to rebut mailing presumption, requires proof of improper procedures.
Read More →
NY Appellate Term reverses summary judgment in medical provider case, finding triable issues of fact regarding whether additional verification requests were properly responded to.
Read More →
Court ruling clarifies timing requirements for IME no-show denials when verification is requested after the missed appointment in New York no-fault insurance cases.
Read More →
Westchester Med. Ctr. v Allstate case analysis: prima facie requirements under Etienne standard vs. Mary Immaculate precedent in NY no-fault claims.
Read More →
Court rules that generic affidavit from third-party biller insufficient to prove mailing compliance in no-fault verification dispute case.
Read More →
Court rules EUO scheduling letter must identify specific person being requested for examination or lose toll benefit under NY Insurance Regulation 65-3.6(b).
Read More →
Court ruling on amended motions, defective IME affidavits, and delay letters vs. verification requests in New York no-fault insurance litigation procedures.
Read More →
Court ruling on no-fault insurance claim denial for acupuncture services due to insufficient response to verification requests and lack of medical necessity evidence.
Read More →
Court rules UB-04 forms alone don't establish prima facie no-fault claims - NF-5 forms required to trigger 30-day payment period under New York insurance law.
Read More →
New York court ruling clarifies that insurance delay letters must request specific verification to toll statutory payment deadlines, raising questions about required detail levels.
Read More →
Court ruling clarifies that mere denial of receiving verification requests cannot overcome legal presumption of proper mailing in no-fault insurance cases.
Read More →
NY appellate court clarifies IME no-show denial timing rules when verification requests toll insurance company's response deadlines under no-fault law.
Read More →
New York court ruling demonstrates how insurance companies can successfully defend no-fault claims when healthcare providers fail to respond to verification requests.
Read More →
Understanding New York no-fault additional verification requirements and challenges for healthcare providers. Expert legal guidance for Long Island practices. Call (516) 750-0595.
Read More →
Court grants summary judgment based on biomechanical engineer's conclusion that claimed injuries could not have resulted from the accident, shifting burden to plaintiff.
Read More →
Court ruling clarifies insurance carriers' burden of proof when denying MRI facility claims based on failure to provide requested verification materials.
Read More →
Court ruling on verification requests in NY no-fault insurance cases, establishing requirements for adequate responses and consequences of inadequate compliance.
Read More →
New York court rules that simply claiming you never received a verification request isn't enough to defeat summary judgment in no-fault insurance cases.
Read More →
Court ruling on additional verification non-receipt in NY no-fault insurance claims, highlighting burden of proof requirements before litigation begins.
Read More →
AIG's failure to properly handle no-fault claim denials highlights insurance company obligations under New York's strict 30-day statutory period requirements.
Read More →
New York's Second Department confirms that no-fault insurers have no obligation to pay or deny claims until all demanded verification is properly submitted by providers.
Read More →
Expert analysis of Exoto v Progressive Insurance on NF-3 verification requirements. Learn to avoid technical rejections in Long Island and NYC. Call 516-750-0595 for help.
Read More →
New York Hospital v Country Wide Insurance case highlights critical lessons about insurance verification requests for Long Island and NYC personal injury claims.
Read More →
NY Appellate Term rules EUO letters need not use large fonts. Important decision for Long Island & NYC medical providers on no-fault insurance requirements. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
Learn how verification timing affects no-fault insurance payment deadlines. Long Island attorneys explain UB-04, NF-2, and NF-5 form requirements.
Read More →
Learn how New York courts interpret no-fault insurance verification timing requirements. Expert legal analysis of Triangle R Inc. case affecting Long Island and NYC claims.
Read More →
NY no-fault insurance verification requests don't require EIP notification when seeking info from medical providers, per Triangle R v Clarendon case analysis.
Read More →
Court ruling highlights that attorney affirmations without personal knowledge lack probative value in no-fault insurance verification disputes.
Read More →
New York court rules that partial compliance with additional verification requests renders no-fault insurance lawsuits premature, requiring complete response to all items.
Read More →
New York courts require insurance companies to prove they never received verification documents with specific evidence and personal knowledge, not mere assertions.
Read More →
Examining peer hearsay exceptions in NY no-fault cases, medical record admissibility, and verification procedures in Urban Radiology v Tri-State Consumer.
Read More →
New York no-fault insurance law case establishing that failure to object to EUO notice prevents later challenges to its validity or reasonableness.
Read More →
Expert analysis of procedural fairness issues in no-fault insurance litigation. Call (516) 750-0595 for experienced legal representation in Long Island and NYC.
Read More →
Learn why expert affidavits are crucial for defending medical billing unbundling claims in NY no-fault insurance. Essential insights for Long Island & NYC legal professionals. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
First appellate case interpreting Infinity v. Eveready timing requirements for no-fault verification requests - Velen Medical Supply decision analysis.
Read More →
How equitable considerations are changing NY no-fault insurance law. Expert analysis from Long Island personal injury attorneys. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →
Learn about NY signature on file requirements for assignment of benefits forms. Expert analysis of verification procedures and no-fault insurance law.
Read More →
Appellate Division to rule on premature additional verification requests in NY no-fault insurance. Analysis of Infinity Health Products case for Long Island attorneys.
Read More →
Navigate NY no-fault additional verification disputes. Long Island attorney guides healthcare providers. Call 516-750-0595 free consultation.
Read More →Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.