Lack of medical necessity defense upheld
January 3, 2015 1 Comment
Five Boro Med. Equip., Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51888(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2014) “Plaintiff’s opposing submission, consisting of
Five Boro Med. Equip., Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51888(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2014) “Plaintiff’s opposing submission, consisting of
Tsimbler v Fell, 2014 NY Slip Op 08982 (2d Dept. 2014) “In opposition, the plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a physician specializing in the field of internal
Easy Care Acupuncture, P.C. v 21 Century Advantage Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51766(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2014) (1) The joy of mailing vendors “In this
Shirom Acupuncture, P.C. v Kemper Independence Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51407(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2014) “We agree that the peer review report relied upon
Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v GEICO Ins., 2014 NY Slip Op 51262(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carol
All-In-One Medical Care, P.C. v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 24070 (Dis. Ct. Nassau Co. 2014) This is what happens when we all stip
All Borough Group Med. Supply, Inc. v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50462(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “At a trial on the issue
Webster Ave Med. Pavilion, PC v Allstate Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50393(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2014) “The trial court was entitled to reject the sparse
Alev Med. Supply, Inc. v Government Employees Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50130(U) “Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, the Civil Court properly overruled plaintiff’s hearsay objection to
Perez v Fitzgerald, 2014 NY Slip Op 00744 (1st Dept. 2014) This is a chiropractor malpractice case and the Appellate Division held that the 3 year and
Metropolitan Diagnostic Med. Care, P.C. v A. Cent. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52246(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In opposition to defendant’s motion, and in
Total Equip., LLC v Mercury Cas. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52220(U)(App. Term 2d Dept 2013) “In support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant submitted, among
Drew De Marco, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52212(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “[d]uring Dr. Portnoy’s redirect testimony, the trial court precluded
Amherst Med. Supply, LLC v A. Cent. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51800(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “The peer review report and accompanying affidavit submitted
Premier Health Choice Chiropractic, P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51802(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “sworn independent medical examination (IME) report of its
Promed Durable Equip., Inc. v GEICO Ins., 2013 NY Slip Op 23283 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (A) The insufficient rebuttal “In support of the branch of
Amato v. State Farm Ins. Co., 30 Misc.3d 238 (Dis. Ct. Nassau Co. 2010), rev’d by Amato v State Farm Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51113(U)(App. Term
Synergy Med. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51047(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “Notably, defendant’s peer reviewer explained in some detail that the manipulation
Brooklyn Chiropractic & Sports Therapy, P.C. v A. Cent. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50904(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (1) “Defendant also submitted an affirmed
Radiology Today, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50849(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “Since defendant’s expert’s testimony did not include a factual basis
