Election to arbitrate
New York no-fault insurance arbitration ruling: once a provider elects arbitration for accident claims, they cannot switch forums even against different carriers.
Election to arbitrate — Read Article →In-depth legal analysis from Attorney Jason Tenenbaum — covering court rulings, legal standards, and practical guidance on arbitrations under New York law.
Expert Analysis
No-fault arbitration is the primary forum for resolving disputes between medical providers and insurers over claim denials. The arbitration process has its own procedural rules, evidentiary standards, and appeal mechanisms — including master arbitration and Article 75 judicial review. Understanding arbitration practice is essential for any attorney handling no-fault claims. These articles cover arbitration procedures, hearing strategies, award enforcement, and the grounds for challenging arbitration outcomes in court.
Read Our Arbitrations Articles
Frequently Asked Questions
No-fault arbitration is conducted under the American Arbitration Association's rules. The claimant (usually a medical provider) files a request for arbitration after the insurer denies a claim. An assigned arbitrator reviews written submissions from both sides — including medical records, denial letters, peer reviews, and legal arguments — and issues a written decision. Arbitration awards can be confirmed in court under CPLR Article 75, and either party can appeal to a master arbitrator. No-fault arbitration is generally faster and less expensive than litigation.
New York no-fault insurance arbitration ruling: once a provider elects arbitration for accident claims, they cannot switch forums even against different carriers.
Election to arbitrate — Read Article →
New York court rules on forum non conveniens doctrine in no-fault insurance provider case, examining jurisdiction factors and witness hardship requirements.
Forum Non Conveniens — Read Article →
New York no-fault insurance arbitration waiver rules - when prior arbitration election bars subsequent court litigation under Ultimate Health Products v Ameriprise case law.
Prior Arb? — Read Article →
Second Department vacates master arbitrator's award in Bay Needle Care v Country-Wide Insurance, finding arbitrator exceeded power by re-weighing evidence.
Gary T day — Read Article →
Master personal jurisdiction challenges in NY insurance cases. Expert analysis of out-of-state insurer defenses. Call 516-750-0595 for legal help.
Personal Jurisdiction in New York Insurance Cases: No-Fault Defense Guide — Read Article →Need Legal Guidance?
Get a Free Case Evaluation
No fees unless we win. Available 24/7.
Learn about court powers to vacate arbitration awards in NY no-fault insurance cases. Key legal standards and real case analysis from Miller v Elrac.
The powers of a court to vacate an arbitration award — Read Article →
Out-of-state insurance carriers can challenge personal jurisdiction in NY courts for no-fault claims. Key case analysis and jurisdictional requirements explained.
Lack of personal jurisdiction for an out of state insurance carrier — Read Article →
New York court rules that infant compromise orders aren't needed in no-fault arbitration when healthcare provider acts as assignee, not the infant patient as party.
Infants compromise order not needed to proceed in arbitration in assignee case — Read Article →
Learn what substantial evidence means in NY no-fault arbitration cases and why courts can't weigh conflicting evidence in administrative awards.
What is substantial evidence? — Read Article →
New York arbitration law allows waiver of arbitration clauses when fee sharing and venue provisions prevent statutory wage claims from being pursued.
Arbitration is waivable — Read Article →
Appellate Division reverses AAA arbitration award in Country-Wide v Radiology case, finding master arbitrator irrationally ignored evidence of failed EUO appearances.
This time Country-Wide gets the Appellate Division to reverse AAA — Read Article →
New York no-fault arbitration case analysis where late submissions led to rocket docket preclusion despite provider's failure to object, highlighting systemic issues.
Rocket Docket – to the moon — Read Article →
Voluntary inter-company arbitration case where insurer exceeded policy limits in award, highlighting importance of rejecting arbitration when limits may be surpassed.
Voluntary inter-company arbitration — Read Article →
DTG Operations v AutoOne Ins. Co. case analysis: loss transfer dispute involving livery vehicle insured as passenger car, arbitration forum issues, and intercompany arbitration...
Loss transfer — Read Article →
Court rejects insurance carrier's attempt to overturn no-fault arbitration award after failing to include required reimbursement language in IME notices.
IME no show not upheld — Read Article →
New York's brutal 20-day rule for staying arbitration when there's no coverage - Allstate loses SUM coverage dispute after missing deadline by months
Snooze and lose rule – Tremendous consequences — Read Article →
Appeals of trial de novo rulings and Article 75 decisions in NY no-fault insurance arbitration cases, including master arbitration brief requirements and administrative remedies.
Trial de novos and exhausting administrative remedies — Read Article →
Court ruling on Insurance Law Section 5107 requiring out-of-state insurers to provide New York no-fault benefits when vehicles operate in NY state.
Framed Issue hearing on Ins Law 5107 — Read Article →
Article 75 case where acupuncture provider's arbitration award was vacated due to policy limits being exceeded, resulting in unsuccessful court challenge.
An article 75 that went nowhere — Read Article →
Court upholds arbitration award under Insurance Law 5105's "reasonable hypothesis" standard, confirming vehicle's commercial use met threshold requirements.
“reasonable hypothesis” standard under Ins Law 5105 — Read Article →
Medical providers cannot compel arbitration for fraud and RICO claims against insurers, Second Circuit rules in Allstate v. Mun case analysis.
Medical provider cannot demand that fraud and RICO matter be heard in arbitration — Read Article →
Court ruling on waiver of arbitration rights through litigation conduct, including counterclaims and participation factors in New York insurance disputes.
Waiver of right to arbitrate — Read Article →
Nassau County court grants trial de novo and declares no coverage in Allstate v. Phelps case, finding stroke treatment unrelated to motor vehicle accident.
Trial De Novo granted and declaration of non-coverage granted — Read Article →
Attorney questions why AAA stopped posting master arbitration decisions after October 2013, highlighting the importance of these decisions for no-fault insurance practitioners.
How come there have been no new master arbitration decisions posted on AAA’s website since October 15, 2013? — Read Article →
Court rules arbitrator's decision non-binding when medical provider wasn't named in proceeding, highlighting importance of proper party inclusion in no-fault arbitrations.
An arbitrator’s order is not binding where the provider was not named in the underlying arbitration — Read Article →
Court ruling clarifies that trial de novo actions seeking declaratory judgments fall outside District Court jurisdiction, requiring proper venue determination.
A trial de novo is but a declaratory judgment action – District Court lacks jurisdiction — Read Article →
Court rules American Arbitration Association arbitrator failed to follow binding Great Wall precedent on acupuncture fee schedules in no-fault insurance dispute.
Great Wall is binding precedent on American Arbitration Association — Read Article →
Rules governing trial de novo in New York no-fault arbitration cases, including timing requirements and jury trial demands under CPLR §3405.
Rules on Trial De-Novo — Read Article →
New York court ruling clarifies that personal jurisdiction is not required for no-fault insurance arbitration proceedings, distinguishing arbitration from traditional court...
Arbitration and personal jurisdiction — Read Article →
New York court ruling clarifies medical providers' independent arbitration rights and insurer EUO denial requirements in no-fault insurance cases.
Roggio/Westchester-Lincoln — Read Article →
Fourth Department reverses Supreme Court decision on Ins Law 5105 loss transfer case involving livery vehicle classification and arbitration waiver rules.
Ins Law 5105 – loss transfer regarding a livery vehilce and a standard passenger vehicle — Read Article →
Court vacates arbitration award when plaintiff denied basic procedural rights including notice, opportunity to be heard, and to present evidence under CPLR Article 75.
Non-compulsory arbitration award vacated — Read Article →
Appellate Division grants Article 75 petition in MVAIC v Interboro Medical, remanding no-fault arbitration case back to AAA for coverage determination.
The Appellate Division grants an Article 75 petition and remands the matter back to AAA arbitration — Read Article →
New York Court of Appeals establishes narrow grounds for vacating no-fault arbitration awards under CPLR 7511, emphasizing limited judicial review options.
Good luck trying to vacate a no-fault arbitration award pursuant to Article 75 — Read Article →
NY court denies EBT in aid of arbitration, ruling disclosure must be "absolutely necessary" not merely convenient for no-fault insurance disputes.
EBT in aid of arbitration? No dice. — Read Article →
Court ruling on waiver of jurisdictional challenges in compulsory arbitration when parties fail to seek timely stay within 20-day period under NY Insurance Law.
The failure to stay a compulsory arbitration on jurisdictional grounds precludes appellate review of the improperly arbitrated jurisdictional issue — Read Article →
Understand the complex implications of default judgments in NY no-fault cases. Learn strategic defense approaches and collateral estoppel consequences.
A default that is more than meets the eyes — Read Article →
Learn the critical service requirements for master arbitral review in New York. Discover how proper procedures can make or break your no-fault arbitration appeal.
The failure to serve a demand for master arbitral review in the manner set forth in the regulations will foreclose review of the underlying award — Read Article →
Learn how collateral estoppel applies in New York no-fault arbitrations. Critical insights from the Falzone decision for Long Island insurance claims and SUM benefits.
Understanding Collateral Estoppel in No-Fault Arbitrations: Critical Insights for New York Insurance Claims — Read Article →
Understanding priority of payment disputes in NY no-fault insurance. Expert analysis of intercompany arbitration requirements, SZ Medical case, and Insurance Law 5105 for NYC and...
Priority of payment disputes must be adjudicated through Ins. Law 5105 intercompany arbitration — Read Article →
Learn how to prove causation in NY no-fault insurance claims. Expert analysis of State Farm v Stack case for Long Island and NYC accident victims.
Causation – Be aware of seeking a trial de novo after a master arbitrator affirms an award — Read Article →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes detailed legal analysis on arbitrations and related topics as part of an ongoing commitment to legal education and transparency. Since 2008, Attorney Tenenbaum has written over 2,353 articles examining how New York courts decide cases involving personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and complex litigation matters. Each article is based on an actual court decision and provides the kind of substantive analysis that practitioners and clients need to understand the current state of the law.
Attorney Tenenbaum brings over 24 years of New York litigation experience to every article. His practice spans Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He has handled thousands of cases involving insurance disputes, personal injury claims, and employment law matters, giving him a practical perspective that academic commentators often lack. The articles in this collection reflect that experience, offering readers insight into how judges actually apply legal standards in contested cases.
If you are dealing with a legal issue related to arbitrations or any topic covered on this blog, the firm offers free initial consultations by phone or in person. Call (516) 750-0595 to speak with an attorney, or visit the contact page to submit a case review request online. No fee is charged unless the firm recovers compensation on your behalf. The firm's six attorneys bring over 112 combined years of legal experience and speak English, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Russian, ensuring clients can communicate in the language they are most comfortable with. Attorney Tenenbaum is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts, and he has authored more than 2,353 published legal articles that attorneys, judges, and insurance professionals across the state rely on for guidance.
New York's legal framework for arbitrations matters involves an intricate web of statutes, regulations, and case law that has developed over decades. The state's court system — including the Civil Court, District Courts, Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals — each plays a distinct role in shaping how arbitrations cases are litigated and decided. Trial-level decisions in Nassau County Supreme Court, Suffolk County Supreme Court, and the New York City Civil Courts establish important factual precedents, while appellate rulings create binding legal standards that all lower courts must follow.
The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs procedure in New York civil litigation and contains provisions that directly impact arbitrations cases. CPLR Article 31 establishes the scope and methods of disclosure, including depositions under CPLR 3107, interrogatories under CPLR 3130, and document demands under CPLR 3120. CPLR 3212 provides the standard for summary judgment, requiring the movant to establish a prima facie case through admissible evidence and shifting the burden to the opponent to raise a triable issue of fact. CPLR 3215 governs default judgments, which require proof of service, proof of the facts constituting the claim, and proof of the amount due. Understanding these procedural tools is essential for anyone involved in arbitrations litigation in New York.
Statutes of limitations vary significantly depending on the type of claim. General negligence and personal injury claims carry a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5). Medical malpractice claims have a shortened two-and-a-half-year deadline under CPLR 214-a. Claims against municipalities require a Notice of Claim within 90 days under General Municipal Law Section 50-e. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including the 30-day filing window for applications and the 45-day submission period for provider claims. Employment discrimination claims under the New York State Human Rights Law generally have a three-year statute of limitations, while federal Title VII claims require EEOC filing within 300 days.
The Appellate Term and Appellate Division regularly issue decisions that clarify and refine the legal standards applicable to arbitrations cases. The Second Department, which covers Long Island and parts of New York City, is particularly active in this area. Its decisions on evidentiary standards, burden-shifting frameworks, and procedural requirements directly affect how trial courts evaluate motions and how attorneys prepare their cases. Attorney Tenenbaum monitors these decisions and analyzes them in the articles on this page, providing practitioners with the timely legal commentary they need to stay current.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. is located at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746, centrally situated on Long Island to serve clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. With over 24 years of experience and more than 1,000 appeals written, Attorney Tenenbaum combines deep legal knowledge with practical courtroom experience. If you need help with a arbitrations matter, call (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Successful outcomes in arbitrations cases often depend on procedural compliance as much as substantive merit. In no-fault insurance litigation, the prima facie case standard requires the plaintiff to submit admissible evidence establishing the claim was properly submitted, overdue, and unpaid. If the defendant raises a defense — such as an IME no-show, EUO non-appearance, lack of medical necessity, or fee schedule dispute — the burden shifts to the plaintiff to present evidence creating a triable issue of fact. Summary judgment motions under CPLR 3212 require the movant to make a prima facie showing through affidavits, deposition testimony, or documentary evidence, and the opposition must raise a genuine factual dispute to avoid dismissal.
In personal injury cases, the discovery process is governed by CPLR Article 31 and involves depositions of parties and witnesses, exchange of medical records under CPLR 3121 authorizations, physical and mental examinations, and expert disclosure. Once discovery is complete, either party may file a note of issue certifying readiness for trial, after which a 120-day deadline applies for filing summary judgment motions under CPLR 3212(a). Motion practice often determines the outcome of cases before trial, and understanding the specific evidentiary standards applied by courts in your jurisdiction is essential. The articles on this page analyze these standards in detail, drawing on real cases litigated by Attorney Tenenbaum and decisions from courts across the state.
The firm serves clients throughout Long Island, including the towns and villages of Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, and Massapequa, as well as all five boroughs of New York City. Attorney Tenenbaum regularly appears in Nassau County Supreme Court, Suffolk County Supreme Court, the New York City Civil Court, the American Arbitration Association, the Workers' Compensation Board, and the Appellate Term and Appellate Division of the Second Department. If you need legal assistance with a arbitrations matter or any topic discussed in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential case evaluation.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. was founded in 2002 and has grown into one of Long Island's most respected personal injury, employment law, and insurance litigation firms. The firm's six attorneys — led by founding partner Jason Tenenbaum — bring over 112 combined years of legal experience to every case. The team speaks English, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Russian, ensuring that clients from diverse backgrounds can communicate in the language they are most comfortable with during what is often one of the most stressful periods of their lives.
Attorney Tenenbaum earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law and is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York. He has written more than 1,000 appellate briefs, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million in verdicts and settlements for injured individuals and workers throughout Long Island and New York City. His 2,353+ published legal articles on New York case law make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state, and his analysis is relied upon by attorneys, judges, and insurance professionals across all four Appellate Division departments.
The firm operates on a contingency fee basis for personal injury and employment discrimination cases, which means clients pay no attorney fees unless the firm recovers compensation on their behalf. Every consultation is free, confidential, and without obligation. The firm's centrally located Huntington Station office provides convenient access to Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts in Central Islip, and the New York City Civil Court. Whether you need help with a car accident claim, a workplace discrimination complaint, a no-fault insurance denial, a workers' compensation dispute, or any other legal matter, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. is ready to fight for your rights.
Questions About Arbitrations?
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has been writing about arbitrations since 2008, drawing on 24+ years of practice. Get a free, confidential case evaluation.
No fees unless we win · Available 24/7 · Hablamos Español
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.