Collateral Estoppel?
September 28, 2020 No Comments
Rojas v Romanoff, 2020 NY Slip Op 04237 (1st Dept. 2020) Collateral estoppel in the First Department to non-suit (1) “In the declaratory judgment action, Nationwide
Rojas v Romanoff, 2020 NY Slip Op 04237 (1st Dept. 2020) Collateral estoppel in the First Department to non-suit (1) “In the declaratory judgment action, Nationwide
Parisien v Allstate Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 51249(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” In support of its motion, defendant submitted the transcript of the
Mnatcakanova v Elliot, 2019 NY Slip Op 05772 (2d Dept. 2019) ” In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Although the
Black v Gordon, 2019 NY Slip Op 04032 (1st Dept. 2019) “The chiropractor acknowledged that the MRI film showed preexisting degenerative conditions, and therefore he was
Martinez v Keenan, 2019 NY Slip Op 50474(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) ” We note that, contrary to defendant’s argument, plaintiff was not required to submit
Torres v Rettaliata, 2019 NY Slip Op 02578 (2d Dept. 2019) “As the defendants failed to establish, prima facie, a lack of causation (see Sanclemente v
Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v Medco Tech, Inc., 2019 NY Slip Op 02167 (1st Dept 2019) ” Respondent seeks from petitioner no-fault insurance benefits
Dixon v Kone, 2019 NY Slip Op 02041 (1st Dept, 2019) ” Defendants submitted, among other things, plaintiff’s deposition testimony, acknowledging that he previously had fusion
Hoffner v Nelson, 2019 NY Slip Op 0078 (4th Dept. 2019) ” It is well established that a defendant may overcome an allegation of serious injury
Imran v R. Barany Monuments, Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op 08921 (2d Dept. 2018) (1) “On June 5, 2015, the matter proceeded to a jury trial
Goodwin v Walter, 2018 NY Slip Op 06643 (4th Dept. 2018) “We further conclude, however, that defendant submitted evidence establishing that plaintiff’s injuries were caused by a
Pavlova v Allstate Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51061(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “In support of its motion, defendant submitted the transcript of the examination under
Hernandez v Marcano, 2018 NY Slip Op 03816 (1st Dept. 2018) However, in any event, defendants Marcano and Crescent Cab Corp.’s expert found full range of motion
Galluccio v Grossman, 2018 NY Slip Op 03664 (2d Dept. 2018) “In opposition, the affirmation of the plaintiffs’ expert failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Campbell v Drammeh, 2018 NY Slip Op 03643 (1st Dept. 2018) In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to his claimed spinal injuries,
Cooper v Nestoros, 2018 NY Slip Op 01716 (4th Dept. 2018) “Plaintiff’s chiropractor testified that, based on that history, he did not believe that plaintiff had suffered
CASE #1 Latus v Ishtarq, 2018 NY Slip Op 01417 (1st Dept. 2018) (1) “Plaintiff’s medical records demonstrated prima facie that plaintiff ceased treatment five months after
Sanchez v Oxcin, 2018 NY Slip Op 00343 (1st Dept. 2018) “The orthopedic surgeon also measured contemporaneous and continuing limitations, and opined that the cervical spine injury
Eason v Blacker, 2017 NY Slip Op 07674 (3d Dept. 2017) This is an important case because it really gives the defendant who obtains the correct records
Dovberg v Laubach, 2017 NY Slip Op 07238 (2d Dept. 2017) (1) “Prior to the commencement of a trial on the issue of damages, the defendants served
