Malella and Attorneys fees
Court ruling on Malella defense and attorney fee calculations in NY no-fault insurance arbitration, including fraudulent incorporation claims and Article 75 proceedings.
Malella and Attorneys fees — Read More →26 articles published in May 2017
The articles below were published in May 2017 by Attorney Jason Tenenbaum and the legal team at his Long Island law office. Each article provides detailed analysis of real court decisions, statutory developments, and procedural issues in New York personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment law.
Attorney Tenenbaum has maintained this legal blog since 2008, creating one of the most comprehensive public archives of New York insurance and personal injury case law analysis available online. Every article draws on his firsthand experience litigating cases in Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts, New York City Civil Court, and the Appellate Term. Unlike generic legal content, these articles cite specific case holdings, analyze judicial reasoning, and identify practical takeaways for attorneys and claimants navigating New York's complex legal landscape.
Whether you are an attorney researching a procedural question, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your legal rights after an accident or workplace dispute, this archive offers substantive legal analysis grounded in real New York courtroom experience. For case-specific legal advice, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Court ruling on Malella defense and attorney fee calculations in NY no-fault insurance arbitration, including fraudulent incorporation claims and Article 75 proceedings.
Malella and Attorneys fees — Read More →New York court ruling demonstrates critical requirements for business records admissibility when assignees lack knowledge of original recordkeeper's practices and procedures.
Business records again — Read More →Court denies deposition request in no-fault insurance case due to insufficient showing that administrator's testimony would yield relevant evidence.
Hello Mrs. Collins — Read More →New York court ruling on Notice of Entry requirements in foreclosure and declaratory judgment actions, including implications for no-fault insurance cases.
Notice of Entry — Read More →Analysis of attorney fee recovery in no-fault insurance declaratory judgment cases, examining when insureds can recover fees when defending against insurer DJ actions.
Attorney fees on a DJ — Read More →Court clarifies that prior motion to dismiss rulings don't control summary judgment applications under law of the case doctrine in New York civil procedure.
Motion to dismiss not dispositive of summary judgment application — Read More →NY Court of Appeals upholds DMV license suspension regulations despite conflicts with Vehicle Traffic Law, with implications for insurance department regulatory authority.
DMV license suspensions upheld – Deference — Read More →Court ruling demonstrates how failure to report injuries or seek immediate medical treatment can undermine causation claims in personal injury cases.
This is what Perl spoke up against — Read More →Learn how collateral source hearings intersect with no-fault insurance in New York personal injury cases, including evidentiary requirements and Workers' Compensation offsets.
Intersection between collateral source hearing and no-fault — Read More →Police report admissibility under CPLR 4518(a) business records exception in personal injury cases - when officer observations are required vs inadmissible witness statements.
Police report and CPLR 4518(a) — Read More →Court upholds EUO no-show denial despite objection letters that weren't properly mailed. Analysis of when objection letters can block valid EUO requests in NY no-fault cases.
No-show based upheld despite objection – with a caveat — Read More →New York court clarifies when IME rescheduling constitutes failure to appear and establishes mail delivery presumption standards for no-fault insurance claims.
No show and non receipt — Read More →Court rules insurance company failed to prove proper denial of non-acupuncture CPT codes 97026 and 97016 under workers' compensation fee schedule requirements.
Non acupuncture based add on codes – issue of fact — Read More →Court rules that late expert disclosure doesn't automatically bar expert evidence in summary judgment motions when failure wasn't willful and no prejudice shown.
CPLR 3101(d)(1) — Read More →Court ruling clarifies when failure to oppose venue change motions creates appealable default orders in New York civil procedure.
Was there opposition to the default motion? — Read More →Court ruled that defendants cannot claim reasonable excuse for default when they received notice of motion for default judgment, despite insurance carrier's failure to respond.
Interesting decision on insurance carrier fauilure — Read More →New York Court of Appeals case on expert witness qualifications in medical malpractice - when specialists lack competent opinion for summary judgment motions.
Competent opinion of a specialist — Read More →Learn how medical professionals must document and explain changes in patient conditions to prove serious injury claims in New York no-fault cases.
Substantiation of diminishment of ROM — Read More →Key MVAIC case law on timely claim filing requirements and police reporting obligations under New York no-fault insurance law, including coverage defenses.
MVAIC issues — Read More →New York court ruling shows insurance companies must provide detailed affidavits about mail handling procedures to successfully invoke the 45-day rule defense in no-fault cases.
45-day rule denial not sustianed — Read More →Appellate Term case where attorney disputed consent order despite court notation, resulting in unsuccessful appeal of $500 no-fault insurance claim in Civil Court Kings County.
It really was not on consent again — Read More →New York City Civil Court Act sections 403 and 404 create jurisdictional quirk that can defeat default judgments when service of process is made outside NYC limits.
Default denied based upon quirk of NYCCCA 403 and 404 — Read More →Court reverses trial judgment after defendant's expert unavailability on Mondays wasn't accommodated, highlighting importance of scheduling flexibility in litigation.
The doctor is not available on Monday/s, can I have another day please? — Read More →Court finds insurance carrier failed to prove proper mailing of denial forms, highlighting critical documentation requirements in no-fault cases.
It was not mailed, again — Read More →Court decisions on renewal and vacatur motions in NY no-fault insurance cases, including releases that bar claims and late filing discretion.
Renewal and vacatur in interest of justice granted upon a release — Read More →Analysis of Country-Wide Ins. Co. v. Dejean regarding declaratory judgment venue rules and EUO timing requirements in NYC no-fault cases.
Declaratory judgment actions against the city — Read More →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes legal analysis on a regular basis covering developments in New York personal injury litigation, no-fault insurance disputes, employment discrimination, and related practice areas. Attorney Tenenbaum started writing about New York case law in 2008, and the blog has grown into a library of over 2,353 articles analyzing court decisions from the Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals.
Topics frequently covered include the prima facie case standard in no-fault actions, the 30-day preclusion rule under Insurance Regulation 192, IME and EUO no-show defenses, summary judgment practice under CPLR 3212, default judgment standards, verification and claims submission procedures, and the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law Section 5102(d). Employment law articles address wrongful termination, workplace discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, wage and hour violations, and employer retaliation claims.
Each article is written for a professional audience but remains accessible to non-lawyers seeking to understand how New York courts handle specific legal issues. The firm serves clients across Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. If you have a legal question about any topic covered in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential consultation.
New York's civil court system is one of the most complex in the nation, with multiple overlapping jurisdictions that affect how personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment cases are litigated. The New York City Civil Court handles claims up to $25,000 in the five boroughs, while the District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk Counties handle similar matters on Long Island. For claims exceeding $25,000, the Supreme Court serves as the primary trial court with unlimited monetary jurisdiction. Despite its name, the Supreme Court is not the highest court in New York — that distinction belongs to the Court of Appeals, which sits in Albany and decides approximately 200 cases per year.
Appeals from Civil Court and District Court decisions go to the Appellate Term, which is divided into departments corresponding to the Appellate Division. The Appellate Term for the Second Department — which covers Nassau County, Suffolk County, Kings County (Brooklyn), Queens County, and Richmond County (Staten Island) — hears hundreds of no-fault insurance appeals each year and has developed a substantial body of case law on topics including timely denial, verification procedures, proof of mailing, fee schedule disputes, and medical necessity standards. The Appellate Division, Second Department, hears appeals from Supreme Court and from the Appellate Term, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts within its jurisdiction.
Understanding where your case falls within this system is critical. A no-fault insurance dispute involving a $3,000 medical bill will follow a very different procedural path than a $500,000 personal injury claim arising from the same automobile accident. The former is typically resolved through mandatory arbitration before the American Arbitration Association under Insurance Department Regulation 68, while the latter proceeds through Supreme Court with full discovery, independent medical examinations under CPLR 3121, depositions, and potentially a jury trial. Attorney Tenenbaum has practiced extensively in all of these venues and understands the strategic considerations unique to each.
Several statutes and regulations appear frequently in the articles archived on this page. Insurance Law Article 51 establishes New York's no-fault insurance framework, requiring every motor vehicle policy to include personal injury protection benefits covering medical expenses, lost earnings (up to $2,000 per month), and other basic economic loss up to $50,000 per person. 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 (Insurance Regulation 192) imposes a 30-day deadline on insurers to pay or deny no-fault claims after receiving proof of claim and all demanded verification, and the failure to timely deny results in preclusion of most coverage defenses.
In personal injury litigation, Insurance Law Section 5102(d) defines the categories of "serious injury" that a plaintiff must establish before recovering non-economic damages in a motor vehicle accident case. The nine categories — death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, fracture, loss of a fetus, permanent loss of use, permanent consequential limitation, significant limitation of use, and the 90/180-day category — each have specific evidentiary requirements that have been refined through decades of appellate decisions. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has litigated serious injury threshold motions in hundreds of cases and regularly writes about new developments in this area.
Employment claims in New York implicate both state and federal statutes. The New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law Section 296) prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, and domestic violence victim status. The New York City Human Rights Law provides even broader protections and applies a more liberal standard. At the federal level, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act provide additional protections but are subject to administrative exhaustion requirements through the EEOC.
Workers' compensation cases in New York are governed by the Workers' Compensation Law and administered by the Workers' Compensation Board. Injured workers are entitled to medical treatment, lost wage benefits (typically two-thirds of the average weekly wage, subject to a statutory maximum), and permanency awards for lasting disabilities. Third-party claims — such as personal injury lawsuits against property owners or general contractors under Labor Law Sections 200, 240, and 241 — often run parallel to workers' compensation proceedings and involve complex lien and subrogation issues that require experienced legal counsel to navigate properly.
The articles in this archive analyze real decisions from courts across New York State, with a particular focus on the Appellate Term and Appellate Division decisions that establish binding precedent for trial courts on Long Island and in New York City. Whether you are an attorney preparing a motion, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your rights, these articles provide the detailed legal analysis that generic legal websites simply cannot offer. For personalized advice about your specific situation, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. serves clients from its office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. The firm represents individuals and businesses throughout Long Island — including the towns of Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton, Huntington, and Oyster Bay in Suffolk County, and the cities and villages of Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa, and Levittown in Nassau County. The firm also handles cases in all five boroughs of New York City: Queens, Brooklyn (Kings County), Manhattan (New York County), the Bronx, and Staten Island (Richmond County). Court appearances are regularly made at Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, the Suffolk County District Court, and the New York City Civil Court throughout the five boroughs.
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.