Key Takeaway
Second Department cites Civil Court decisions by Judge Levine on 30-day notice requirements in no-fault insurance, highlighting interesting case law hierarchy.
This article is part of our ongoing timely notice of claim coverage, with 15 published articles analyzing timely notice of claim issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Westchester Med. Ctr. v Hereford Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 04156 (2d Dept. 2012)
I found this case interesting, not for the proposition of law that it represented, but based upon the case citations.
The underlying premise is that the 30-day written notice of claim requirement is a precludable condition precedent to coverage. The road that was taken to re-articulate this point was interesting.
“the defendant’s failure to respond to the no-fault billing within the requisite 30-day period precluded it from raising the defenses that it was not provided with timely notice of the underlying motor vehicle accident or proof of claim (see Bayside Rehab & Physical Therapy P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 24 Misc 3d 542, 545 (LEVINE J.); Rockman v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 21 Misc 3d 1118, 2008 NY Slip Op 52093 (LEVINE, J.); Vincent Med. Servs., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 21 Misc 3d 142, 2008 NY Slip Op 52442 ).”
Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win
Does this apply to your situation?
Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.
“Finally, although the defense of lack of coverage is not precluded by the defendant’s failure to pay or deny the subject no-fault claim within the requisite 30-day period (see Hospital for Joint Diseases v Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 9 NY3d 312, 318; Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195, 199), here, the defendant’s submissions were insufficient to raise triable issues of fact with respect to a lack of coverage defense (see Mercury Cas. Co. v Encare, Inc., 90 AD3d 475; D.S. Chiropractic, P.C. v. Country-Wide Ins. Co., 24 Misc 3d 138, 2009 NY Slip Op 51584 ).”
It is remarkable that the App. Div. 2nd Dept. cited to 1) Civil Court; 2) App. Term 2d Dept; and 3) Inapplicable 1st Dept case law in order to reach the conclusion that it did.
I am waiting to see if the First Department will expand Unitrin to include 30-day failure to give proper written notice of claim cases. I am actually more interested to see what the upstate Appellate Divisions have to say about all of this. Since the upstate court calendars move quickly, we may know rather soon what the Fourth Department has to say…
Related Articles
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.
Keep Reading
More Timely notice of claim Analysis
Reasonable Excuse and the 45-Day Rule: Why Clerical Error Won't Save a Misdirected No-Fault Claim
Karina K. Acupuncture v Hertz: a clerical error is no reasonable excuse for mailing NF-3 forms to the wrong insurer under New York's 45-day no-fault claim rule.
Dec 18, 2018
Timely notice
Court ruling reinforces 30-day notice requirement for no-fault claims, with insurance company successfully defending late notice denial under 11 NYCRR 65-1.1.
Nov 13, 2018
Some doors have swung open
Court case analysis on timely notice requirements for no-fault insurance claims, examining whether NF-3 forms can serve as proper accident notice to carriers.
Jan 24, 2017
Written proof of loss is when it is mailed
Court rules that mailing written proof of loss satisfies 30-day notice requirement under NY no-fault insurance regulations, even if insurer receives it later.
Mar 21, 2016
An oral notice of claim is deemed sufficient notice?
New York court rules oral notification sufficient for no-fault claims, raising questions about written notice requirements and trial strategy in insurance disputes.
Aug 28, 2014
consideration" an element to a late notice claim.
New York Court of Appeals ruling requires insurers to show "due consideration" when denying late no-fault claims, changing how prima facie defenses must be established.
Aug 19, 2011Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a timely notice of claim matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
