Key Takeaway
Bankruptcy discharge doesn't eliminate judgment liens on property - important considerations for personal injury attorneys and no-fault insurance practitioners.
This article is part of our ongoing no-fault coverage, with 271 published articles analyzing no-fault issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
I always joke around with my plaintiff friends that should you sue my clients, I will be the first person on the ECF system to file an appropriate bankruptcy petition. If you represent real people with real problems, you will have given some advise on how to protect them from unsecured judgment creditors. But, it is important to know that an unsecured judgment creditor can become a quasi -secured judgment creditor when that judgment lien attaches to real property your client owns. An 11 USC 522(f) motion needs to be made in bankruptcy court to void the lien. The failure to do this can spell grave disaster.
I mention this because I came across this interesting case. One of our local 7 trustees was involved in this litigation – probably too late, as you can see herein:
Nelson, L.P. v Jannace, 2011 NY Slip Op 06373 (2d Dep. 2011)
“ discharge in bankruptcy is a discharge from personal liability only and, without more, does not have any effect on a judgment lien” (Matter of Acquisitions Plus, LLC v Shapiro, 7 AD3d 957, 958; 11 USC § 524). Judgment liens and other secured interests ordinarily survive bankruptcy (see Carman v European Am. Bank & Trust Co., 78 NY2d 1066; McArdle v McGregor, 261 AD2d 591; Bank of N.Y. v Magri, 226 AD2d 412; see also Farrey v Sanderfoot, 500 US 291, 297). Moreover, a creditor need not object to the debtor’s discharge in bankruptcy in order to preserve its lien, since the discharge does not affect the lien (see Carman v European Am. Bank & Trust Co., 78 NY2d 1066; McArdle v McGregor, 261 AD2d 591).
Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win
Does this apply to your situation?
Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.
When the defendants received discharges in bankruptcy, their personal liability to the plaintiff on the judgment was discharged (see 11 USC § 524 ). However, the defendants did not meet their burden of establishing that the liens on their real property were invalidated or surrendered in the bankruptcy proceedings or set aside in an action brought by the receiver or trustee.
Accordingly, they were entitled only to a qualified discharge (see Debtor and Creditor Law § 150; Carman v European Am. Bank & Trust Co., 78 NY2d 1066; Bank of N.Y. v Magri, 226 AD2d 412; Matter of Leonard v Brescia Lbr. Corp., 174 AD2d 621). “A qualified’ discharge, as distinguished from an unqualified discharge, serves as notice to third parties that, notwithstanding the debtor-owner’s discharge in bankruptcy, the property may, nonetheless, still be burdened by liens” (Carman v European Am. Bank & Trust Co., 78 NY2d at 1067).
Anyway the point is if you meander too far outside your comfort zone, be really careful where you step.
Related Articles
- Understanding CPLR 3212(a): Critical Timing Rules for Summary Judgment Motions in New York
- The CPLR 3212(g) paradigm
- Reasonable excuse satisfied despite claim of lack of personal jurisdiction
- New York No-Fault Insurance Law
Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2011 post, federal bankruptcy laws and procedures may have been modified through legislative amendments, updated federal rules, or changes in trustee practices. Additionally, New York state judgment lien procedures and exemption statutes may have evolved, potentially affecting lien avoidance strategies under 11 USC § 522(f). Practitioners should verify current federal bankruptcy provisions and corresponding New York state law requirements when advising clients on judgment creditor protection strategies.
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York's no-fault insurance system, established under Insurance Law Article 51, is one of the most complex insurance frameworks in the country. Every motorist must carry Personal Injury Protection coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of fault, up to $50,000 per person.
But insurers routinely deny valid claims using peer reviews, EUO scheduling tactics, fee schedule reductions, and coverage defenses. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has handled over 100,000 no-fault cases since 2002 — from initial claim submissions through arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, trials in Civil Court and Supreme Court, and appeals to the Appellate Term and Appellate Division. Jason Tenenbaum is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
His 2,353+ published legal articles on no-fault practice are cited by attorneys throughout New York. Whether you are dealing with a medical necessity denial, an EUO no-show defense, a fee schedule dispute, or a coverage question, this article provides the kind of detailed case-law analysis that helps practitioners and claimants understand exactly where the law stands.
About This Topic
New York No-Fault Insurance Law
New York's no-fault insurance system requires every driver to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of who caused the accident. But insurers routinely deny, delay, and underpay valid claims — using peer reviews, IME no-shows, and fee schedule defenses to avoid paying providers and injured claimants. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has litigated thousands of no-fault arbitrations and court cases since 2002.
271 published articles in No-Fault
Keep Reading
More No-Fault Analysis
Car Accident Recorded Statement in New York: Should You Give One?
The at-fault driver's adjuster wants a recorded statement within days of a New York car accident — and that call is designed to weaken your case.
Apr 5, 2026Who Pays Car Accident Medical Bills in New York? A Step-by-Step Guide
New York no-fault PIP, primary health insurance, Medicaid/Medicare, and litigation liens — the full payment ladder for car-accident medical bills.
Apr 5, 2026Form and procedure – not part of a prima facie case in a cancellation case
New York appellate court clarifies burden of proof in no-fault insurance cancellation disputes, shifting responsibility to claimants to prove procedural defects.
Jun 18, 2012Policy Exhaustion in New York No-Fault Insurance: What You Need to Know
Understanding policy exhaustion in New York no-fault insurance. Learn your rights when benefits reach limits. Get expert legal help - call 516-750-0595.
Jun 25, 2023Agency for subrogation purposes
Court ruling on insurer subrogation rights and agency law in NY no-fault cases, establishing when subrogation accrues and notice requirements to carriers.
Nov 10, 2021Causation: not enough to state pre-existing
Court finds that medical reports citing only degenerative changes fail to eliminate factual disputes when they don't address patient's lack of pre-accident pain complaints.
May 1, 2019Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a no-fault matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.