This was just a thought as I read through the Appellate Term, Second Department, decisions that came out today. I will confess that I was .5 for 3 in today’s appellate decisions, which should be some proof that this court is not as “defendant friendly” as too many practitioners urge the bar to believe. I also am not ashamed to admit that sometimes, the chips do not stack up in your favor, even though you deep down believe they should.
That being said, the question is what happened? I will try to give some insight in some of the subsequent posts that I will be posting today, August 19, 2010.
-JT
6 Responses
I really don’t think you met prima facie defense re lack of medical necessity on our appeal, but at least the result is proper.
It was not medical necessity Sun, it was causation. I also think you got a free ride on this one. But you tend to pull things off against me that few seem to do, so I guess congratulations. You are a valiant warrior.
I stand corrected. Back from vacation and half brain dead today. Valiant, yes, fighting even on vacation. Thanks for the complement.
With that kind of mushy talk none of you get to play linebacker on my football team. Jack Lambert even hated his own quarterback and suggested he wear a dress — that would be Terry Bradshaw.
Can I be the kicker?
Absolutely Dave. You’re clutch.