Why Trust This Analysis
This article is part of our ongoing no-fault coverage, with 271 published articles analyzing no-fault issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Traffic tickets with technical errors are more common than you might think. Whether it’s citing the wrong Vehicle and Traffic Law subdivision or including incorrect statutory references, these mistakes often lead defendants to believe their cases will be automatically dismissed. However, New York courts have consistently held that minor clerical errors don’t necessarily invalidate an otherwise valid traffic citation. If you’re dealing with a no-fault insurance defense matter, an experienced attorney can help protect your rights.
Understanding how courts handle these situations is crucial for anyone facing traffic violations. The legal principle at work here involves distinguishing between substantive defects that undermine a case and mere technical errors that can be overlooked or corrected. This distinction has important implications for traffic defense strategies and helps explain why simply pointing to a clerical error rarely results in case dismissal.
Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:
People v Husain (Shanzeb), 2017 NY Slip Op 27195 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2017)
“It has been held that where an information charges a violation of the wrong section of a statute, this may be disregarded as surplusage if the information fully advises the defendant of the acts relied upon to constitute the alleged violation, and if the acts charged are clearly referable to the offense of which the defendant has been convicted… . All that is necessary is that the information shall state the crime charged with such accuracy that the defendant may know the offense which it is claimed he has committed” (People v Love, 306 NY 18, 23 ). Further, as a general rule, “misnomers” in designating the offense charged are not jurisdictional and may be corrected by amendment”
Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win
Does this apply to your situation?
Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.
Every client will tell you that the “traffic ticket has an error” and it must be dismissed. Tell the client: not necessarily.
Key Takeaway
Courts focus on whether defendants can reasonably understand what they’re being charged with, not whether every technical detail is perfect. Wrong statute citations can be treated as “surplusage” and corrected through amendment. The key test is whether the violation description gives adequate notice of the alleged offense, making technical errors insufficient grounds for automatic dismissal.
Understanding Traffic Ticket Defense
This principle extends beyond traffic matters into other areas of law practice. Just as technical errors in traffic citations don’t automatically invalidate cases, similar principles apply in New York No-Fault Insurance Law where procedural missteps don’t always defeat otherwise valid claims. The courts consistently prioritize substance over form, ensuring that justice isn’t derailed by minor clerical mistakes.
Related Articles
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York's no-fault insurance system, established under Insurance Law Article 51, is one of the most complex insurance frameworks in the country. Every motorist must carry Personal Injury Protection coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of fault, up to $50,000 per person.
But insurers routinely deny valid claims using peer reviews, EUO scheduling tactics, fee schedule reductions, and coverage defenses. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has handled over 100,000 no-fault cases since 2002 — from initial claim submissions through arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, trials in Civil Court and Supreme Court, and appeals to the Appellate Term and Appellate Division. Jason Tenenbaum is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
His 2,353+ published legal articles on no-fault practice are cited by attorneys throughout New York. Whether you are dealing with a medical necessity denial, an EUO no-show defense, a fee schedule dispute, or a coverage question, this article provides the kind of detailed case-law analysis that helps practitioners and claimants understand exactly where the law stands.
About This Topic
New York No-Fault Insurance Law
New York's no-fault insurance system requires every driver to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of who caused the accident. But insurers routinely deny, delay, and underpay valid claims — using peer reviews, IME no-shows, and fee schedule defenses to avoid paying providers and injured claimants. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has litigated thousands of no-fault arbitrations and court cases since 2002.
271 published articles in No-Fault
Keep Reading
More No-Fault Analysis
Car Accident Recorded Statement in New York: Should You Give One?
The at-fault driver's adjuster wants a recorded statement within days of a New York car accident — and that call is designed to weaken your case.
Apr 5, 2026
Who Pays Car Accident Medical Bills in New York? A Step-by-Step Guide
New York no-fault PIP, primary health insurance, Medicaid/Medicare, and litigation liens — the full payment ladder for car-accident medical bills.
Apr 5, 2026
Illogical
New York appellate court highlights inconsistencies in no-fault insurance law regarding IME request timing and policy voiding procedures in healthcare provider billing disputes.
Mar 19, 2015
Understanding Account Stated Claims and Medical Billing in New York No-Fault Cases
Understanding account stated claims and service verification in New York no-fault medical billing disputes. Expert legal guidance from experienced NY attorneys.
Nov 26, 2009
Post-EUO Verification Demands and the 120-Day Rule: State Farm v Burke Physical Therapy
State Farm v Burke: the 2022 post-EUO ruling, later appellate decisions on document scope and timing, and why reasonable justification remains record-specific.
Mar 19, 2022
A very interesting 5102(d) case
Court ruling clarifies burden of proof standards in no-fault insurance cases, addressing cervical spine claims and delayed shoulder injury reporting requirements.
Jul 20, 2020Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a no-fault matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
