Waiting to conduct discovery fatal to 3212(f) claim
Williams v New York City Tr. Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 51286(U) (App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) Inaction is acquiescence. “At the outset, we reject plaintiff’s argument
Williams v New York City Tr. Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 51286(U) (App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) Inaction is acquiescence. “At the outset, we reject plaintiff’s argument
What Happened in the Case The plaintiff, Sensible Choice Contracting, LLC, filed a motion for summary judgment—a legal request asking the court to decide the case
Reeps v BMW of N. Am., LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 02907 (1st Dept. 2018) “Prior court orders and stipulations between the parties show that the parties,
Rodriguez v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 02287 (2018) (1) “The motion for summary judgment must also “show that there is no defense to the
Healthy Way Acupuncture, P.C. v 21st Century Indem. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50204(U)(App. Term 2d Dept, 2017) “In this action by a provider to recover
This is a no-brainer but one Plaintiff firm out there emphasizes that the 120 day rule in CPLR 3212(a) applies to when a motion is served.
Wade v Knight Transp., Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 05262 (2d Dept. 2017) “Notwithstanding that CPLR 3212(b) requires that motions for summary judgment be supported by a
Zarnoch v Luckina, 2017 NY Slip Op 02233 (3d Dept. 2017) “To the extent that the cross motion sought relief pursuant to CPLR 3211 (b), it was
Rodriguez v 2526 Valentine LLC, 2015 NY Slip Op 08620 (2d Dept. 2015) I thought that each application in Supreme Court required the paying of a filing
SAL Med., P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51449(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “The defect in one of the peer review reports submitted