Choice of law?
March 17, 2021 No Comments
Schottenstein Pain & Neuro, PLLC v Travelers Ins. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 51549(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “It is uncontroverted that the automobile accident took
Schottenstein Pain & Neuro, PLLC v Travelers Ins. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 51549(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “It is uncontroverted that the automobile accident took
Omphil Care, Inc. v Pearl Holding Group Managing Gen. Agent for Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. Co. 2020 NY Slip Op 50946(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “It
Monroe v Omni Indem. Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 50731(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2020) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the affidavit of defendant’s litigation representative was sufficient
NR Acupuncture, P.C. v Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 51892(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) “It is uncontroverted that the vehicle involved in
Dassa Orthopedic Med. Servs. PC v Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 51664(U)(Civ. Ct. Kings Co. 2019) “The police report indicates that the subject
Williams v Janvier, 2019 NY Slip Op 07638 (2d Dept. 2019) One thing that I frequently observe is Pa license plates, Pa policies and the usual
Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v Anthony, 2019 NY Slip Op 03662 (1st Dept. 2019) “Contrary to petitioner’s contention, it was not permitted
Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v 21st Century Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51815(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “Moreover, even if defendant had established that Florida law
Acupuncture Now, P.C. v GEICO Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51084(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) “While defendant asserts that Virginia law applies to this case, as
Utopia Equip. Inc. v Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 50080(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2018) “Defendant’s submissions included an affidavit of its claims manager
Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v Infinity Group, 2017 NY Slip Op 27040 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) I do not normally post about PA-NY choice of law
Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50029(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Inasmuch as defendant’s cross motion papers failed to
JCC Med., P.C. v Infinity Group, 2016 NY Slip Op 26439 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) It is uncontroverted that defendant had issued a Georgia automobile
Healthway Med. Care, P.C. v Infinity Group, 2016 NY Slip Op 51780(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Although defendant’s cross motion papers set forth facts demonstrating that its
St. Chiropractic, P.C. v Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 26271 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Since the insurance policy at issue contains a provision
Renelique v Metlife Auto & Home, 2016 NY Slip Op 51075(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Insofar as is relevant to the present case, while Massachusetts law provides
Flushing Traditional Acupuncture, P.C. v Auto Club Ins. Assn., AAA Mich., 2016 NY Slip Op 26125 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) (1) “Despite defendant’s assertions that it
Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v Infinity Group, 2016 NY Slip Op 50257(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “In order to prevail on its motion for summary judgment
Compas Med., P.C. v Infinity Group, 2016 NY Slip Op 50042(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) Florida law prevails again, and the decision makes sense. I imagine of
New Way Med. Supply Corp. v Infinity Group, 2015 NY Slip Op 51880(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “In Pennsylvania, in order for an insurance policy to
