Skip to main content
Are Car Accident Settlements Taxable in New York?
Car Accidents

Are Car Accident Settlements Taxable in New York?

By Jason Tenenbaum 15 min read

Why Trust This Analysis

This article is part of our ongoing car accidents coverage, with 234 published articles analyzing car accidents issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

This article was published April 5, 2026. Corrected October 14, 2026: the earlier text cited New York Tax Law § 612(c)(3) for the state rule (the rule is § 612(a), which starts New York adjusted gross income from federal adjusted gross income), credited IRC § 130 with excluding structured settlement payments (the exclusion is § 104(a)(2) itself; § 130 governs the company that takes the assignment), described the Schleier test as requiring a "physical" injury, and opened with a summary about a different area of law. The text below states the rule as verified against the Internal Revenue Code and IRS Publications 4345 and 525.

Key Takeaways

  • Damages received “on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness” are not income under IRC § 104(a)(2), whether paid as a lump sum or as periodic payments. In a car accident case that includes the lost-wage part of the recovery.
  • Punitive damages are taxable even when the case is a physical injury case. The § 104(c) wrongful-death exception does not reach New York.
  • Interest on a settlement or an award is generally taxable as interest income.
  • The part of a settlement that pays back medical expenses you deducted in an earlier year is taxable to the extent the deduction gave you a tax benefit.
  • New York adjusted gross income starts from federal adjusted gross income (Tax Law § 612(a)), so the federal answer carries into the state return.

Last reviewed: October 2026

One of the first questions clients ask after reaching a settlement in a New York car accident case is whether they will owe taxes on the money they receive. After months or years of medical appointments, lost work, and litigation, the last thing anyone wants is an unexpected tax bill. The general rule is favorable: compensatory damages for a physical injury are not taxable under federal law, and New York starts from the federal number. There are exceptions, and getting the categories wrong can lead to problems with the IRS or the New York Department of Taxation and Finance.

This guide walks through the federal and state tax treatment of car accident settlements in New York, covers the exceptions that can create taxable income, and explains what records you should keep regardless of whether you expect a tax obligation. If you have questions about your case specifically, a Long Island car accident lawyer can help you understand how a potential settlement would be structured and what the tax implications might be.

Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win

Does this apply to your situation?

Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.

The General Rule: Physical Injury Settlements Are Not Taxable

The foundational rule comes from Internal Revenue Code § 104(a)(2). Gross income does not include “the amount of any damages (other than punitive damages) received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness.” The exclusion covers the compensatory damages that flow from a physical injury: medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and the emotional distress that comes with the injury.

The critical phrase is “on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness.” Until Pub. L. 104-188, § 1605 (August 20, 1996), the statute read “on account of personal injuries or sickness.” That amendment added the word “physical” and the words “(other than punitive damages),” and added the sentence that “emotional distress shall not be treated as a physical injury or physical sickness.” For car accident victims who suffered broken bones, soft tissue injuries, disc herniations, traumatic brain injuries, or any other bodily harm, the § 104(a)(2) exclusion applies to the compensatory recovery.

New York follows the federal result. Under Tax Law § 612(a), “The New York adjusted gross income of a resident individual means his federal adjusted gross income as defined in the laws of the United States for the taxable year, with the modifications specified in this section,” and § 612 lists no modification for personal injury damages. An amount excluded from federal income under § 104(a)(2) is therefore not in New York adjusted gross income either.

What Is Tax-Free in a Car Accident Settlement

Understanding which components of a settlement are excluded from income helps clarify why most car accident recoveries fall outside the tax net.

Compensation for physical injuries and physical sickness. The core of any car accident settlement, damages for the bodily harm itself, is excluded. IRS Publication 525 puts it this way: “Don’t include in your income compensatory damages for personal physical injury or physical sickness (whether received in a lump sum or installments).”

Medical expense reimbursement. When a settlement reimburses you for medical bills you paid, or for future medical care you will need, that reimbursement is generally excluded under § 104(a)(2). The exception for medical expenses you deducted in an earlier year is discussed below.

Pain and suffering tied to physical injury. Compensation for the pain, suffering, and mental anguish that result from a physical injury is excluded as part of the physical injury damages.

Lost wages when paid as part of a physical injury settlement. The Supreme Court used a car accident to explain this in Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323 (1995). The Court’s hypothetical taxpayer “is in an automobile accident, is injured, and as a result of that injury suffers (a) medical expenses, (b) lost wages, and (c) pain, suffering, and emotional distress.” If that taxpayer settles the lawsuit for $30,000 “(and if the taxpayer has not previously deducted her medical expenses, see § 104(a)), the entire $30,000 would be excludable under § 104(a)(2).” The reason: “the accident causes a personal injury which in turn causes a loss of wages.” Schleier set two requirements for the exclusion: the underlying claim must be “based upon tort or tort type rights,” and the damages must be received “on account of personal injuries or sickness.” The Court decided the case under the pre-1996 wording; the statute now requires the injury or sickness to be physical, which a car accident injury is.

Emotional distress damages arising from physical injury. Emotional distress alone is not a physical injury. When the distress is a consequence of a physical injury, Publication 525 treats the damages “as received for the physical injury or sickness.” A car accident victim who develops anxiety, PTSD, or depression as a result of the physical trauma of the crash can include those damages in the tax-free recovery.

What Is Taxable in a Car Accident Settlement

The exceptions to the general rule are specific. Mischaracterizing a taxable component as tax-free can result in underreported income and penalties.

Punitive damages are taxable. The statute excludes damages “(other than punitive damages),” and IRS Publication 4345 says punitive damages are taxable “even if the punitive damages were received in a settlement for personal physical injuries or physical sickness.” The Supreme Court reached the same result under the earlier wording in O’Gilvie v. United States, 519 U.S. 79 (1996), holding that the punitive damages in that case were not received “on account of” personal injuries. There is one narrow exception in § 104(c), for wrongful death actions where state law in effect on September 13, 1995 provided that “only punitive damages may be awarded.” It does not apply in New York, where EPTL 5-4.3(a) awards “fair and just compensation for the pecuniary injuries resulting from the decedent’s death.” In practice, punitive damages are rarely awarded in routine car accident cases; they require proof of truly reckless or malicious conduct. When they are awarded or separately allocated in a settlement, that portion is taxable and must be reported.

Emotional distress damages NOT arising from physical injury. If you recover for emotional distress that does not flow from a physical injury, the recovery is taxable, with one carve-out. The statute says “emotional distress shall not be treated as a physical injury or physical sickness,” and then exempts damages “not in excess of the amount paid for medical care” attributable to the emotional distress. Publication 525 states the result: include the damages in income “except for any damages you receive for medical care due to that emotional distress.”

Lost wages in a claim that is not a physical injury claim. When lost wages are recovered outside a physical injury tort, for example in a discrimination case or a wage claim against an employer, they do not qualify for the § 104(a)(2) exclusion. In a car accident case this rarely comes up, because the wage loss is part of the injury claim.

Interest on a delayed settlement or judgment. Interest is income under IRC § 61(a)(4), and Publication 4345 says “Interest on any settlement is generally taxable as ‘Interest Income.’” Publication 525 lists “Interest on any award” first among the items included as ordinary income. That is true even when the principal it is paid on is tax-free, so interest a court adds to a verdict or judgment is reported as interest.

The “Physical Injury” Requirement in Detail

Because the entire § 104(a)(2) exclusion hinges on the claim being “on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness,” it is worth understanding how that phrase works.

The physical injury must be the origin of the damages, not just a side effect of some other wrong. In Schleier, the Court held that back pay recovered under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act was not excludable: “In age discrimination, the discrimination causes both personal injury and loss of wages, but neither is linked to the other.” The nature of the underlying claim, not just the type of harm suffered, controls the analysis.

For car accident victims, this distinction almost never creates a problem. The underlying claim is a negligence tort, the injury is physical, and the settlement is received on account of that physical harm.

PTSD and anxiety are common consequences of serious car accidents. As noted above, psychological harm that flows from a physical injury remains excluded. A plaintiff who suffered a traumatic brain injury and later developed PTSD can recover for both, and the recovery for both is excluded. The same logic applies to a victim who develops severe depression following a catastrophic spinal cord injury, provided the depression flows from the physical injury itself.

How an Employment Settlement Is Different

The same statute produces a very different answer in a case against an employer, which is why the physical injury question matters so much. IRS Publication 4345 says that in an employment-related lawsuit, “for unlawful discrimination or involuntary termination, the portion of the proceeds that is for lost wages (i.e., severance pay, back pay, front pay) is taxable wages,” subject to Social Security and Medicare tax and “to employment tax withholding by the payer.” The Form 1099-MISC instructions add that “Taxable back pay damages may be wages and reportable on Form W-2.”

Emotional distress damages in a discrimination case are taxable too, because no physical injury is behind them. The 1099-MISC instructions tell payers to “report all compensatory damages for nonphysical injuries or sickness, such as employment discrimination or defamation,” generally in box 3. The medical care carve-out described above still applies.

Attorney fees work differently in those cases as well, as the next sections explain.

The Medical Expense Deduction Rule

There is one situation where otherwise tax-free medical reimbursements become partly taxable. Section 104(a) opens with an exception for “amounts attributable to (and not in excess of) deductions allowed under section 213 (relating to medical, etc., expenses) for any prior taxable year.” Publication 4345 explains: “you must include in income that portion of the settlement that is for medical expenses you deducted in any prior year(s) to the extent the deduction(s) provided a tax benefit.”

The mechanics work like this. Suppose you deducted $15,000 in medical expenses in 2024, and those deductions actually reduced your taxable income because they cleared the floor in § 213(a), which allows medical expenses only “to the extent that such expenses exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income.” If your 2026 settlement then reimburses that $15,000, the reimbursed amount is income to the extent the earlier deduction gave you a tax benefit, not the gross amount of the deduction. If the medical expenses were paid over more than one year, Publication 4345 says the part of the proceeds for medical expenses is allocated “on a pro rata basis” to each year.

This affects only people who itemized and whose accident-related medical expenses cleared the floor. It matters most in serious injury cases with large treatment bills. If you deducted medical expenses from your accident, tell your accountant about your settlement so the rule can be applied correctly.

Structured Settlements and IRC § 130

For large car accident recoveries, particularly those involving permanent disabilities, catastrophic injuries, or long-term care needs, structured settlements are often negotiated instead of a single lump-sum payment. A structured settlement converts the recovery into a stream of periodic payments, typically funded by an annuity purchased from a life insurance company. Our guide to structured settlements in New York car accident cases covers how they are set up.

The exclusion for the payments you receive comes from § 104(a)(2) itself, which covers damages received “whether as lump sums or as periodic payments.” Each periodic payment of physical injury damages is excluded in full. A lump sum invested on your own is different: the principal is excluded, but the interest and dividends it earns afterward are income under § 61(a).

Section 130 is the provision that makes the arrangement work for the other side. It lets the company that takes over the obligation (a “qualified assignment”) exclude what it receives for agreeing to make the payments, up to the cost of the annuity or Treasury obligation that funds them. One of the conditions in § 130(c) is that the “periodic payments are fixed and determinable as to amount and time of payment” and “cannot be accelerated, deferred, increased, or decreased by the recipient.” In other words, the schedule you agree to is the schedule you live with.

Structured settlements make particular sense when the recovery is large enough that the plaintiff would otherwise face investment risk, when the plaintiff is a minor, or when the plaintiff has a disability that affects money management. A Long Island car accident lawyer who handles serious injury cases should discuss the structured settlement option as part of any settlement negotiation involving significant future damages.

Attorney Fees and the Commissioner v. Banks Problem

In Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), the Supreme Court held that “when a litigant’s recovery constitutes income, the litigant’s income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee.” The plaintiff is taxed on the whole recovery, including the share the lawyer takes. The Court noted that the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 had already added a deduction for some of these fees, but it did not apply to the cases in front of it.

For physical injury cases, the Banks problem largely disappears because the compensatory recovery is excluded under § 104(a)(2). If the settlement is not income, the attorney’s share of it is not income either.

The issue arises when a settlement contains a taxable part, such as punitive damages, alongside the tax-free part. The deduction Congress added in 2004 is IRC § 62(a)(20), an above-the-line deduction for “attorney fees and court costs paid by, or on behalf of, the taxpayer in connection with any action involving a claim of unlawful discrimination,” capped at the amount of the judgment or settlement included in income for the year. Section 62(e) defines “unlawful discrimination” by a list of statutes, ending with any federal, state, or local law “providing for the enforcement of civil rights” or “regulating any aspect of the employment relationship.” That covers most employment cases. A negligence claim from a car crash is not on the list.

The practical takeaway: in a pure physical injury settlement, attorney fees are a non-issue for federal income tax purposes. The compensatory recovery, before the fee comes out, is excluded from income.

New York State Tax Treatment

As noted above, New York adjusted gross income begins with federal adjusted gross income under Tax Law § 612(a), and the section contains no modification for personal injury damages. What is excluded federally under § 104(a)(2), including periodic payments under a structured settlement, stays out of New York income. What is taxable federally, such as punitive damages, interest, and emotional distress damages not tied to a physical injury, is in federal adjusted gross income and carries into the New York return.

New York City residents also pay city income tax. Under Tax Law § 1303, “The city taxable income of a city resident individual shall mean and be the same as his or her New York taxable income,” with exceptions that do not involve settlement proceeds. There is no separate New York City analysis for settlement proceeds.

Keeping Records and Working with a CPA

Even when a car accident settlement is entirely tax-free, keeping good records is important. If the IRS sends a notice about income reported on a Form 1099 for the payment, you will need documentation showing that the payment was an excluded physical injury recovery. The medical expense rule requires you to trace prior medical deductions and match them to any reimbursements. A structured settlement comes with its own paperwork, and the payment schedule in it is fixed.

Documents to retain include the settlement agreement (which should allocate amounts between physical injury damages, punitive damages, interest, and any other components), any court order approving the settlement, correspondence about the nature of the claim, medical records establishing the physical injuries, and prior tax returns showing any deduction of accident-related medical expenses.

Consulting a CPA or tax attorney before finalizing a settlement, particularly a large one, is advisable. They can review the allocation language in the agreement and flag any issues before the settlement is signed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need to report my car accident settlement on my tax return? Generally, no. Publication 4345 says that if you receive a settlement for personal physical injuries or physical sickness and did not deduct related medical expenses in prior years, “the full amount is non-taxable. Do not include the settlement proceeds in your income.” Punitive damages, interest, and reimbursed medical expenses you deducted earlier are the exceptions. If a Form 1099 arrives for the payment, take it and the settlement agreement to your tax preparer.

What if my settlement includes both injury damages and punitive damages? The punitive portion is taxable and must be reported. The allocation in the settlement agreement matters. Publication 4345 says, “Generally, the IRS will not disturb an allocation if it is consistent with the substance of the settled claims.” An allocation that does not match the claims that were settled does not get that deference.

Are workers’ compensation payments taxable? Workers’ compensation benefits are excluded under IRC § 104(a)(1), which covers “amounts received under workmen’s compensation acts as compensation for personal injuries or sickness.” That is a separate provision from the physical injury exclusion.

What about the money from a wrongful death claim? The compensatory damages in a wrongful death case arising from a car accident are analyzed under § 104(a)(2) the same way. Punitive damages in a wrongful death case remain taxable, and the § 104(c) exception does not apply in New York because EPTL 5-4.3(a) provides for compensatory damages.

Speak with a Long Island Car Accident Lawyer About Your Case

The tax treatment of your settlement is one of many factors that can affect the net value you take home. A well-structured settlement, one that documents the physical injury basis for the damages, considers the structured settlement option for large recoveries, and allocates the money in line with the claims, can meaningfully improve your outcome. A Long Island car accident lawyer who handles serious injury cases negotiates not just the gross amount but also the structure and documentation of a settlement.

If you were injured in a car accident on Long Island and want to understand your options, including how a recovery would be characterized for tax purposes, contact us for a free consultation. We handle cases in Nassau County, Suffolk County, and throughout New York, and we do not charge a fee unless we recover for you.

Sources

For additional guidance on this topic, see:

If you have a case involving these issues on Long Island or in the New York City metropolitan area, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. offers free consultations. Call (516) 750-0595 or contact our office online.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,600 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

About This Topic

Car Accident Law in New York

Car accidents in New York involve both no-fault insurance claims for immediate medical coverage and potential third-party lawsuits for pain and suffering — but only if the injured person meets the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law 5102(d). Understanding the interplay between first-party benefits and third-party litigation, police reports, comparative fault rules, and damages calculations is critical. These articles analyze the legal issues that arise in New York car accident cases across Long Island and NYC.

234 published articles in Car Accidents

Was this article helpful?

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a car accidents matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filed under: Car Accidents

Part of the Car, Truck & Motorcycle Accident Claims archive in the Personal Injury Law section of the New York Legal Encyclopedia.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

Written By

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2008, he has authored more than 2,600 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,600+ Published
Licensed In
6 States + Federal

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Review Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Free Consultation Free Case Review