Skip to main content
CPLR § 2106 Amendment Eliminates Affidavit Notarization Requirement: What This Means for New York Litigation
Evidence

CPLR § 2106 Amendment Eliminates Affidavit Notarization Requirement: What This Means for New York Litigation

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

NY CPLR 2106 amendment eliminates notarized affidavits and certificates of conformity. Learn how this changes litigation practice. Call 516-750-0595.

This article is part of our ongoing evidence coverage, with 312 published articles analyzing evidence issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

As of January 1, 2024, New York no longer requires notarized affidavits in civil litigation. The amended CPLR § 2106 allows any person — anywhere in the world — to submit a signed affirmation under penalty of perjury in lieu of a notarized affidavit, eliminating the certificate of conformity requirement that has tripped up personal injury attorneys, no-fault practitioners, and commercial litigators for decades. Here’s what changed, why it matters, and how to update your practice.

New York Eliminates the Notarized Affidavit Requirement — A Seismic Shift in Civil Practice

For decades, New York attorneys — particularly those practicing on Long Island and in New York City — have wrestled with one of the most frustrating procedural requirements in civil litigation: the certificate of conformity for out-of-state affidavits under CPLR § 2309(c). Countless motions have been denied, summary judgment applications rejected, and cases delayed — all because a sworn statement from a witness in New Jersey, Florida, or California lacked the proper certificate authenticating the notary.

That era is now over.

Effective January 1, 2024, Governor Hochul signed into law a sweeping amendment to CPLR § 2106 that fundamentally changes how sworn statements are handled in New York courts. The amendment allows any person, anywhere in the world, to submit an affirmation in lieu of a notarized affidavit — with the same legal force and effect.

For personal injury attorneys, no-fault practitioners, and commercial litigators across Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx, this is one of the most significant procedural changes in a generation.

What Changed: The Old Rule vs. The New Rule

❌ Before Jan 1, 2024

  • Find out-of-state notary
  • Execute affidavit before notary
  • Obtain certificate of conformity under RPL § 299-a
  • Verify notary authorization
  • Risk rejection for technical defects
  • Only attorneys, MDs, DOs, dentists could affirm

✔ After Jan 1, 2024

  • Sign affirmation with statutory language
  • Any person, anywhere in the world
  • No notary required
  • No certificate of conformity
  • No RPL § 299-a compliance
  • Same legal force as an affidavit

Before January 1, 2024 — The Certificate of Conformity Era

Under the old framework, if you needed a sworn statement from a witness located outside New York, you had two options — both cumbersome:

  1. Notarized affidavit + certificate of conformity: The witness had to find a notary, execute the affidavit before them, and then obtain a separate certificate of conformity under Real Property Law § 299-a confirming that the notary was authorized under that state’s laws. If the certificate was deficient — wrong format, missing seal, incomplete language — the entire affidavit could be rejected.
  2. Limited affirmation (attorneys and healthcare professionals only): Under the old CPLR § 2106, only attorneys, physicians, osteopaths, and dentists could submit unnotarized affirmations. Everyone else — including the parties themselves, fact witnesses, expert witnesses outside medicine, and business record custodians — needed a notarized affidavit.

The result was a procedural minefield. As we documented in our analysis of the Andromeda Medical Care decision, courts routinely rejected affidavits where the certificate of conformity did not strictly comply with Real Property Law § 299-a — even when the underlying testimony was perfectly credible.

After January 1, 2024 — The Affirmation Era

The amended CPLR § 2106 eliminates these barriers entirely. The new statute provides:

“The statement of any person wherever made, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be used in an action in New York in lieu of and with the same force and effect as an affidavit.”

The required language is straightforward:

Required Affirmation Language

“I affirm this ___ day of ______, ____, under the penalties of perjury under the laws of New York, which may include a fine or imprisonment, that the foregoing is true, and I understand that this document may be filed in an action or proceeding in a court of law.”

No notary. No seal. No certificate of conformity. No Real Property Law § 299-a compliance. Just a signature and the affirmation language.

Why This Matters: Practical Impact on New York Litigation

New York courthouse hallway where CPLR 2106 affirmations now replace notarized affidavits in litigation

New York courts now accept unnotarized affirmations under the amended CPLR § 2106, streamlining civil litigation practice.

1. Out-of-State Documents Are Now Simple

The most immediate impact is on out-of-state witness statements. Previously, getting a properly executed affidavit from a witness in Florida or California meant coordinating notary appointments, explaining certificate of conformity requirements to confused out-of-state notaries, and risking rejection if any technical requirement was missed. Now, the witness simply signs the affirmation with the statutory language. Done.

For Long Island personal injury attorneys handling cases with out-of-state medical providers, expert witnesses, or accident witnesses who have relocated, this eliminates what was often weeks of delay.

2. No-Fault Insurance Litigation Gets Streamlined

No-fault practice in Nassau County and Suffolk County frequently involves medical providers, billing companies, and insurance adjusters located outside New York. Under the old rules, obtaining proper affidavits from these out-of-state parties was a constant source of procedural challenges — and a favorite weapon for insurance companies looking to defeat summary judgment motions on technical grounds.

The CPLR § 2106 amendment removes this weapon from insurers’ arsenal. An affirmation from an out-of-state medical provider or billing specialist now carries the same weight as a locally notarized affidavit.

3. Business Records Certification Simplified

Under the old regime, certifying business records for admission under CPLR § 4518(c) often required a notarized affidavit from the records custodian. If that custodian was in another state, the certificate of conformity requirement applied. Now, the custodian can simply affirm the records under CPLR § 2106 without involving a notary at all.

4. Summary Judgment Practice Transformed

Summary judgment motions in New York courts require sworn evidentiary support. The number of motions that have been denied — or had key evidence excluded — due to deficient out-of-state affidavits or missing certificates of conformity is staggering. The amended CPLR § 2106 should dramatically reduce these technical defeats, allowing courts to focus on the merits of the evidence rather than the formalities of its execution.

Facing a summary judgment motion in New York? The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has extensive experience with summary judgment strategy and procedural compliance across Nassau County, Suffolk County, and NYC courts. Call (516) 750-0595 or contact us online.

5. Alignment with Federal Practice

New York has now joined the federal courts and numerous other states that accept unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury. The federal version — 28 U.S.C. § 1746 — has been in effect since 1976. New York’s adoption of a similar standard brings state practice into the modern era and eliminates the confusion that arose when attorneys practiced in both state and federal courts with different documentation requirements.

What This Means for the Certificate of Conformity

While CPLR § 2309(c) — the statute requiring certificates of conformity for out-of-state oaths — has not been formally repealed, the practical effect of the CPLR § 2106 amendment is to render it largely obsolete for litigation purposes. Why would any attorney go through the process of obtaining a notarized affidavit with a certificate of conformity when a simple affirmation achieves the same legal result?

That said, practitioners should be aware that CPLR § 2309(c) remains on the books. In non-litigation contexts where affirmations under CPLR § 2106 may not apply — such as certain real property filings or administrative proceedings — the certificate of conformity requirement may still be relevant.

Practical Guidance for New York Attorneys

Action Items Checklist

Update your form files immediately. Replace affidavit templates with affirmation templates that include the CPLR § 2106 language — witness statements, expert reports, business records certifications, all sworn documents.
Brief your out-of-state witnesses. They no longer need to find a notary. They simply sign the affirmation with the statutory language above their signature.
Keep affidavit capability as a backup. Some court clerks and judges may not yet be familiar with the amendment. Having a notarized affidavit as a fallback prevents surprises.
Watch for appellate guidance. Courts are still developing case law. Key questions — like whether affirmation language must be exact or “substantial” — will be clarified as decisions are published.
Use affirmations for trial submissions. The statute applies to any use “in an action in New York” — trial submissions, motion practice, discovery responses, and any other sworn statement context.

Attorneys: Need to refer a New York personal injury case? Jason Tenenbaum handles car accidents, construction accidents, medical malpractice, slip and fall, and other personal injury claims across Long Island and NYC. Learn about the firm or call (516) 750-0595 to discuss a referral.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the CPLR § 2106 amendment mean I never need a notary for New York litigation?

For most litigation purposes, yes. An affirmation under the amended CPLR § 2106 can be used “in lieu of and with the same force and effect as an affidavit.” However, certain non-litigation filings — such as real property recordings or some administrative proceedings — may still require notarized documents.

Do I still need a certificate of conformity for out-of-state documents?

If you use an affirmation under CPLR § 2106 instead of an affidavit, no certificate of conformity should be required because the certificate requirement under CPLR § 2309(c) applies specifically to out-of-state oaths — and an affirmation is not an oath. However, until appellate courts definitively address this question, cautious practitioners may want to include one as a belt-and-suspenders measure.

Can non-attorneys now submit affirmations in New York?

Yes. This is one of the most significant changes. Previously, only attorneys, physicians, osteopaths, and dentists could submit affirmations. Now any person — parties, fact witnesses, expert witnesses, business custodians — can submit an affirmation under CPLR § 2106.

What happens if I use the old affidavit format instead of an affirmation?

Notarized affidavits remain valid. The amendment does not prohibit affidavits — it simply provides an alternative that carries equal weight. If you already have a notarized affidavit, it is still fully acceptable.

When did this change take effect?

The amendment took effect on January 1, 2024, after being signed by Governor Hochul in October 2023. It applies to all actions and proceedings commenced on or after that date, and should also apply to pending actions where new submissions are made after the effective date.

The Bottom Line

The amendment to CPLR § 2106 is one of the most consequential changes to New York civil procedure in decades. It eliminates a procedural trap that has cost litigants time, money, and — in some cases — their claims. For personal injury attorneys, no-fault practitioners, and commercial litigators on Long Island and throughout New York City, this change simplifies practice, reduces technical defaults, and brings New York in line with the modern approach to sworn statements.

If you are involved in litigation in New York and have questions about how the CPLR § 2106 amendment affects your case, or if you have been injured and need experienced legal representation, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum is ready to help. We handle the full spectrum of personal injury and civil litigation matters across Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and throughout New York State.

For attorneys: Whether you need co-counsel on a complex case or want to refer a New York personal injury, car accident, or construction accident matter, we welcome the opportunity to work together. Browse our full list of practice areas to learn more.

Free consultation — no fee unless we win. Call (516) 750-0595 to speak with Jason Tenenbaum directly, or contact us online to get started.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

About This Topic

Evidentiary Issues in New York Litigation

The rules of evidence determine what information a court or arbitrator may consider in deciding a case. In New York no-fault and personal injury practice, evidentiary issues arise constantly — from the admissibility of business records and medical reports to the foundation requirements for expert testimony and the application of hearsay exceptions. These articles examine how New York courts apply evidentiary rules in insurance and injury litigation, with practical guidance for building admissible evidence at every stage of a case.

312 published articles in Evidence

Keep Reading

More Evidence Analysis

FAQ

How to Talk to a Judge in New York: What to Say, What to Avoid, and How to Present Yourself

Practical guide on how to talk to a judge in New York courts. Proper forms of address, courtroom behavior, and tips from Long Island attorney Jason Tenenbaum. Call 516-750-0595.

Feb 24, 2026
Procedural Issues

Be careful what you wish for

Florida PIP case examines filing fee strategy where GEICO confessed judgment to block amendment attempts after low-value complaint filing in Alliance Spine v GEICO.

May 26, 2021
Procedural Issues

The 60-day rule that was never published in the law journal

Court applies unpublished 60-day summary judgment rule in Civil Court case, raising procedural questions about timing limits and Second Department review needed.

Apr 2, 2014
3404

A Case and Reserves That Will Remain in Limbo: Understanding New York No-Fault Insurance Law

Learn how New York court calendar restoration rules create legal limbo for personal injury cases, keeping insurance reserves tied up indefinitely in Long Island and NYC.

Feb 3, 2012
Fee Schedule

Fee Schedule Defense Requirements in No-Fault Insurance Cases | Long Island & NYC Legal Analysis

Expert legal analysis of fee schedule defense requirements in no-fault insurance cases. Call (516) 750-0595 for experienced representation in Long Island and NYC.

Mar 26, 2010
Evidence

A procedural gem – affidavit as probative evidence

Court ruling demonstrates that affidavits can serve as competent evidence even when referencing underlying documents not produced, providing valuable precedent for no-fault cases.

Oct 25, 2018
View all Evidence articles

Was this article helpful?

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.

24+ years in practice 1,000+ appeals written 100K+ no-fault cases $100M+ recovered

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a evidence matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Legal Resources

Understanding New York Evidence Law

New York has a unique legal landscape that affects how evidence cases are litigated and resolved. The state's court system includes the Civil Court (for claims up to $25,000), the Supreme Court (the primary trial court for unlimited jurisdiction), the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts), the Appellate Division (divided into four Departments, with the Second Department covering Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and several upstate counties), and the Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). Each court has its own procedural requirements, local rules, and case-assignment practices that can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

For evidence matters on Long Island, cases are typically filed in Nassau County Supreme Court (at the courthouse in Mineola) or Suffolk County Supreme Court (in Riverhead). No-fault arbitrations are heard through the American Arbitration Association, which assigns arbitrators throughout the metropolitan area. Workers' compensation claims go to the Workers' Compensation Board, with hearings at district offices across the state. Understanding which forum is appropriate for your case — and the specific procedural rules that apply — is essential for a successful outcome.

The procedural landscape in New York also includes important timing requirements that can affect your case. Most civil actions are subject to statutes of limitations ranging from one year (for intentional torts and claims against municipalities) to six years (for contract actions). Personal injury cases generally have a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5), while medical malpractice claims must be filed within two and a half years under CPLR 214-a. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including 30-day filing requirements for applications and 45-day deadlines for provider claims. Understanding and complying with these deadlines is critical — missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case may be on the merits.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum regularly practices in all of these venues. His office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, NY 11746, is centrally located on Long Island, providing convenient access to courts and offices throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City. Whether you need representation in a no-fault arbitration, a personal injury trial, an employment discrimination hearing, or an appeal to the Appellate Division, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. brings $24+ years of real courtroom experience to your case. If you have questions about the legal issues discussed in this article, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, no-obligation consultation.

New York's substantive law also presents distinct challenges. In motor vehicle cases, the no-fault system under Insurance Law Article 51 provides first-party benefits regardless of fault, but limits the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the plaintiff establishes a "serious injury" under one of nine statutory categories. This threshold — codified at Insurance Law Section 5102(d) — requires medical evidence showing more than a minor or subjective injury, and courts have developed detailed standards for each category. Fractures must be documented through imaging studies. Claims of permanent consequential limitation or significant limitation of use require quantified range-of-motion testing with comparison to norms. The 90/180-day category demands proof that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident.

In employment discrimination cases, the legal standards vary depending on whether the claim arises under state or local law. The New York State Human Rights Law employs a burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by showing membership in a protected class, qualification for the position, an adverse employment action, and circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision. If the employer meets this burden, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the stated reason is pretextual. The New York City Human Rights Law, by contrast, applies a broader standard, asking whether the plaintiff was treated less well than other employees because of a protected characteristic.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review