Skip to main content
The chiropractor rate is all that an acupuncurist is entitled to
Fee Schedule

The chiropractor rate is all that an acupuncurist is entitled to

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Understanding acupuncture fee schedule requirements in New York no-fault cases. Legal guide on chiropractic rate reimbursement for acupuncture providers.

This article is part of our ongoing fee schedule coverage, with 118 published articles analyzing fee schedule issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

Understanding Acupuncture Fee Schedules in New York Personal Injury Cases

In the complex world of New York’s no-fault insurance system, acupuncture practitioners and their patients often face confusion about proper reimbursement rates. For healthcare providers serving accident victims across New York City and Long Island, understanding how courts determine acupuncture fee schedules is essential for successful practice and fair compensation. The legal landscape surrounding acupuncture billing has evolved significantly, with recent court decisions providing clear guidance on reimbursement standards.

Acupuncture has become an increasingly important treatment modality for personal injury victims throughout the New York metropolitan area. From Manhattan’s bustling medical centers to suburban practices in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, acupuncture providers play a vital role in helping accident victims recover from their injuries. However, the intersection of traditional Eastern medicine and New York’s regulatory framework has created unique challenges for both practitioners and patients.

The Appellate Term is starting to sound like a broken record. Yet, each time they play the record it seems that the message is more emphatic.

In New Wave Acupuncture v. Geico, 2009 NY Slip Op 52211(u)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009), the Court stated the following: “For the reasons stated in Great Wall Acupuncture v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (16 Misc 3d 23 ), it was proper for defendant to use the workers’ compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors to determine the amount which plaintiff was entitled to receive.”

Note: The court as of this case and Ava Acupuncture v. Geico does not require the carrier to provide evidence as to why it chose to pay chiropractor fee schedule rate as opposed to another rate. The chiropractor fee schedule amount is acceptable as a matter of law. Period, the end.

Now, let’s assume that you are in a stipped in trial and the sole issue is whether or not the billing was in accordance with the “fee schedule”. Based on New Wave Acupuncture v. Geico and Ava Acupuncture v. Geico, this is what the defendant’s portion of the trial should look like:

Exhibit “A”

(1) Denial of claim form with explanation of benefits

Exhibit “B” .

(2) Fee schedule with CPT 97810, 97811, 97813, 97814;

Exhibit “C” .

(3) Chiropractor conversion factor ;

Exhibit “D” for identification:

(4) Shiny Sharpe brand Calculator

Exhibit “E” for reference: New Wave Acupuncture v. Geico and Ava Acupuncture v. Geico

(5) Give copies to the Judge and Plaintiff’s counsel.

(6) Tell Plaintiff and judge: “No, I do not need to bring a claim rep. This is why…”

(7) With calculator, take the relative value, multiply by the Region IV conversion factor of 5.78 and announce the result to the court. If you want, read the portion of the fee schedule that tells the court that this is how you arrive at the compensable amount. You will find this in the introduction section of the fee schedule.

Now, do this for each billed for code. Does the amount you calculated match the amount paid on the denial of claim form? If yes, go to next step.

(7) Motion for directed verdict.

(8a) If win smile

(8b) If lose APPEAL and do not forget to enter a judgment for costs and disbursements including the prospective marshal fee after the judgment is reversed without costs. The without costs only refers to appellate costs.

(8c) Tell the marshal you want to enforce the $105 judgment you just entered. See what the marshal says. I know first hand what you will be told. But, insist that the marshal collects the judgment. He is duty-bound to do this. I guarantee you will have a check in the mail in no time. One warning however: the next time you call that marshal, you will be told that you have the wrong number. Don’t worry – there are plenty of marshals out there.

Impact on NYC and Long Island Acupuncture Practitioners

The ruling in New Wave Acupuncture has significant implications for acupuncture providers throughout the New York metropolitan area. Practitioners in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island, Nassau County, and Suffolk County must understand that their reimbursement rates are legally tied to chiropractic fee schedules, regardless of the specialized nature of acupuncture services or the unique training required for licensure.

This standardization affects thousands of acupuncture providers across the region who treat motor vehicle accident victims. Many practitioners initially assumed that acupuncture services would be reimbursed at rates comparable to other specialized medical treatments, but the court’s clear directive eliminates any ambiguity about billing standards.

Understanding the Fee Schedule Framework

The workers’ compensation fee schedule structure that governs acupuncture reimbursement in no-fault cases uses a complex system of relative value units (RVUs) and conversion factors. For Region IV, which includes the New York metropolitan area, the conversion factor of 5.78 multiplied by the relative value for specific CPT codes determines the maximum allowable reimbursement.

Common acupuncture CPT codes affected by these rulings include:

  • 97810: Acupuncture, one or more needles; without electrical stimulation, initial 15 minutes
  • 97811: Acupuncture, without electrical stimulation, each additional 15 minutes
  • 97813: Acupuncture, one or more needles; with electrical stimulation, initial 15 minutes
  • 97814: Acupuncture, with electrical stimulation, each additional 15 minutes

Each of these codes has a specific relative value that, when multiplied by the 5.78 conversion factor, establishes the legally mandated reimbursement rate for acupuncture services in personal injury cases.

Practical Implications for Patients and Providers

For accident victims seeking acupuncture treatment in New York City and Long Island, understanding these billing limitations is crucial for making informed healthcare decisions. Patients should be aware that their insurance coverage through no-fault benefits will be calculated using chiropractic rates, which may be lower than standard acupuncture fees charged for non-insurance patients.

Healthcare providers must also adjust their billing practices and patient communications accordingly. Many acupuncture practices across the five boroughs and Long Island have had to modify their business models to accommodate these reimbursement limitations while still providing quality care to accident victims.

Frequently Asked Questions About Acupuncture Fee Schedules

Why are acupuncture services reimbursed at chiropractic rates in no-fault cases?

The New York courts determined that the workers’ compensation fee schedule for chiropractic services provides an appropriate framework for acupuncture reimbursement. This decision was based on legal precedent and the need for standardized billing practices within the no-fault system, rather than the specific nature of acupuncture treatment.

Can acupuncturists charge patients the difference between their regular fees and insurance reimbursement?

The ability to balance bill patients (charge them for amounts above insurance reimbursement) depends on specific contractual arrangements and state regulations. Providers should consult with legal counsel about their particular circumstances and ensure compliance with New York no-fault insurance laws.

How do I calculate the correct reimbursement amount for acupuncture services?

To calculate proper reimbursement, multiply the relative value unit (RVU) for the specific CPT code by the Region IV conversion factor of 5.78. This calculation provides the maximum allowable reimbursement under New York’s no-fault system for acupuncture services.

What should acupuncture providers do if insurance companies underpay claims?

Providers should first verify that their billing accurately reflects the proper CPT codes and that their calculations align with the fee schedule requirements. If underpayment persists despite correct billing, they may need to pursue formal dispute resolution through the appropriate legal channels.

Are there any exceptions to the chiropractic fee schedule requirement for acupuncture?

Based on current court precedents, including New Wave Acupuncture v. Geico, the chiropractic fee schedule rates are mandatory for acupuncture services in no-fault cases. The courts have made clear that insurance carriers are not required to justify this rate structure, as it is established as a matter of law.

If you’re an acupuncture provider or patient dealing with no-fault insurance billing disputes, or if you’ve been injured in an accident and need guidance on your treatment options and insurance coverage, don’t address these complex waters alone. Call 516-750-0595 to speak with an experienced attorney who understands both the medical and legal aspects of personal injury cases in New York. Our team can help ensure you receive the compensation and care you deserve while complying with all applicable legal requirements.


Legal Update (February 2026): The fee schedules and reimbursement rates referenced in this 2009 post have been subject to multiple regulatory amendments and updates over the past 17 years. Practitioners should verify current fee schedule provisions, as the Department of Financial Services has implemented various adjustments to no-fault reimbursement rates and billing procedures since this decision. Additionally, subsequent court decisions and regulatory changes may have modified the standards for acupuncture reimbursement discussed in this analysis.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

About This Topic

Fee Schedule Issues in No-Fault Insurance

The New York no-fault fee schedule establishes the maximum reimbursement rates for medical treatment provided to injured motorists. Disputes over fee schedule calculations, coding, usual and customary charges, and the applicability of workers compensation fee schedules to no-fault claims are common. These articles analyze fee schedule regulations, court decisions on reimbursement disputes, and the practical challenges providers face in obtaining appropriate payment under the no-fault system.

118 published articles in Fee Schedule

Was this article helpful?

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.

24+ years in practice 1,000+ appeals written 100K+ no-fault cases $100M+ recovered

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a fee schedule matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filed under: Fee Schedule
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Legal Resources

Understanding New York Fee Schedule Law

New York has a unique legal landscape that affects how fee schedule cases are litigated and resolved. The state's court system includes the Civil Court (for claims up to $25,000), the Supreme Court (the primary trial court for unlimited jurisdiction), the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts), the Appellate Division (divided into four Departments, with the Second Department covering Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and several upstate counties), and the Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). Each court has its own procedural requirements, local rules, and case-assignment practices that can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

For fee schedule matters on Long Island, cases are typically filed in Nassau County Supreme Court (at the courthouse in Mineola) or Suffolk County Supreme Court (in Riverhead). No-fault arbitrations are heard through the American Arbitration Association, which assigns arbitrators throughout the metropolitan area. Workers' compensation claims go to the Workers' Compensation Board, with hearings at district offices across the state. Understanding which forum is appropriate for your case — and the specific procedural rules that apply — is essential for a successful outcome.

The procedural landscape in New York also includes important timing requirements that can affect your case. Most civil actions are subject to statutes of limitations ranging from one year (for intentional torts and claims against municipalities) to six years (for contract actions). Personal injury cases generally have a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5), while medical malpractice claims must be filed within two and a half years under CPLR 214-a. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including 30-day filing requirements for applications and 45-day deadlines for provider claims. Understanding and complying with these deadlines is critical — missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case may be on the merits.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum regularly practices in all of these venues. His office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, NY 11746, is centrally located on Long Island, providing convenient access to courts and offices throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City. Whether you need representation in a no-fault arbitration, a personal injury trial, an employment discrimination hearing, or an appeal to the Appellate Division, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. brings $24+ years of real courtroom experience to your case. If you have questions about the legal issues discussed in this article, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, no-obligation consultation.

New York's substantive law also presents distinct challenges. In motor vehicle cases, the no-fault system under Insurance Law Article 51 provides first-party benefits regardless of fault, but limits the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the plaintiff establishes a "serious injury" under one of nine statutory categories. This threshold — codified at Insurance Law Section 5102(d) — requires medical evidence showing more than a minor or subjective injury, and courts have developed detailed standards for each category. Fractures must be documented through imaging studies. Claims of permanent consequential limitation or significant limitation of use require quantified range-of-motion testing with comparison to norms. The 90/180-day category demands proof that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident.

In employment discrimination cases, the legal standards vary depending on whether the claim arises under state or local law. The New York State Human Rights Law employs a burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by showing membership in a protected class, qualification for the position, an adverse employment action, and circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision. If the employer meets this burden, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the stated reason is pretextual. The New York City Human Rights Law, by contrast, applies a broader standard, asking whether the plaintiff was treated less well than other employees because of a protected characteristic.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review