Can I See My Personnel File in New York? New Law Says Yes

On September 9, 2026, the Governor signed S.3460 / A.2107 into law as Chapter 293 of the Laws of 2026. It adds a new section to the Labor Law, § 210-b, and for the first time gives New York employees, private sector included, a statutory right to see and copy their own personnel file.

The law takes effect on the 60th day after signing. That is November 8, 2026.

Until now, the honest answer to “can I see my personnel file in New York” was: only if your employer felt like showing you. New York had no general statutory right for private-sector employees to look at their own file. Public employees had limited rights under civil service rules and union contracts. Everyone else had a request that HR could refuse without giving a reason, and in my experience often did.

I represent employees in Huntington Station and across Long Island. The personnel file is the first document I ask for in a discrimination, retaliation or wage case, and today I only get it after a lawsuit is filed and discovery begins. From November 8, 2026, my clients can get it themselves, in five business days, at no cost. That changes how these cases start. The write-up you first hear about at the exit interview is, from that date, a violation. That one sentence is going to change how a lot of managers keep notes.

Updated September 14, 2026: the legislative history below is corrected (the Assembly passed the bill on May 19, and it reached the Governor on September 9), and a new section covers the Governor’s approval memo and the chapter amendment she says is coming.

Where the law came from

The bill was sponsored by Senator Andrew Gounardes, with Senate co-sponsors Addabbo, Hoylman-Sigal, Jackson, Myrie, Ramos, Rivera, Salazar and Webb; Assemblymember Jessica González-Rojas carried A.2107. The Senate passed it once before, in June 2025, and it died in the Assembly. This session it passed the Senate on April 22, 2026, by a vote of 38 to 21, was substituted for A.2107 on May 11, and passed the Assembly on May 19, 2026. It then sat for nearly four months. It was delivered to the Governor on September 9 and signed the same day. The sponsor memo says it is modeled on the Massachusetts personnel record law.

What the Governor said when she signed it

The Governor did not sign this bill clean. Her approval memo says the bill as drafted has “ambiguities that needed to be resolved to avoid uncertainty for both employers and employees,” and that she has an agreement with the Legislature to fix them in the next session. Two fixes are named: employers will not be required to create a personnel file or produce documents beyond the records they already keep, and a personnel file will mean only the records used to determine an employee’s qualifications for hiring, retention, promotion, transfer, additional compensation or discipline.

Here is what that means in practice. The law as signed takes effect November 8, 2026 whether or not the amendment has passed. The Legislature’s next regular session opens in January 2027, so unless it is called back early, the broader text is what governs on November 8, 2026 and for some months after. The amendment narrows the law. It does not add anything, and it does not touch the ten-day notice, the five-business-day copy, the three-year retention, the written statement or the retaliation clause. An employer who reads the memo as permission to wait is misreading it. An employee who asks for the file on November 9 is entitled to whatever the employer keeps that fits the definition, and “we have not built a file yet” is not an answer the statute recognizes.

What the law gives you

The 10-day notice. Under subdivision 2, when the employer places anything in your file that could count against you, it has 10 days to tell you. The secret write-up, the memo to file that surfaces for the first time at a termination meeting: from November 8, 2026, each of those is a violation.

The correction and the written statement. Under subdivision 3, if you disagree with an entry, you and the employer can agree to remove or correct it. If you cannot agree, you may submit a written statement explaining your position. It becomes part of the record and must be included whenever the information is transmitted to a third party, as long as the original is retained. If the employer put something in the file that it knew or should have known was false, the statute says you have a remedy to have it expunged, through the collective bargaining agreement, other personnel procedures, or the courts.

The fine, and what it does not do. Subdivision 7 sets a fine of $500 to $2,500 for any violation and gives enforcement to the Attorney General. I want to be candid about this. The section itself does not give you a private right of action to collect that fine. The pressure on an employer comes from somewhere else: the Attorney General, the retaliation ban, the written statement, and the file itself, which becomes an exhibit in any discrimination, retaliation or wage case.

No retaliation. Subdivision 8 forbids discharging, threatening, penalizing, discriminating against or retaliating against an employee for exercising rights under the section, and it expressly includes threatening to contact, or contacting, immigration authorities about the employee or the employee’s family or household member. That clause connects to Labor Law § 215, which is where the money is. Section 215(1)(a)(vi) protects an employee who has “otherwise exercised rights protected under this chapter,” and a written request under § 210-b is exactly that. An employee fired or punished for asking can sue within two years for reinstatement, lost pay or front pay, liquidated damages of up to $20,000 and attorney’s fees, and the statute’s “all appropriate relief” language is the hook for compensatory damages beyond the cap, and the Attorney General can add a civil penalty of $1,000 to $10,000, or up to $20,000 for a repeat violation within six years. Our employer retaliation page explains how those claims are built.

The whistleblower statute is where this gets expensive. Section 215 protects the request. Labor Law § 740, the whistleblower law, protects what you say after you read the file. It forbids an employer from retaliating against an employee who discloses to a supervisor, or objects to, an employer practice the employee reasonably believes violates a law, and a violation of § 210-b is a violation of a law. “You never gave me the ten-day notice on this warning” is a whistleblower disclosure. So is “this entry is false and you knew it.” So is refusing, if you work in HR, to backdate a warning or purge a file before it is produced; § 740 protects the employee who objects to or refuses to participate in the practice, whether or not it is part of the job. The remedies are the reason to know this: a jury, reinstatement or front pay, lost wages and benefits, attorney’s fees, a civil penalty of up to $10,000 and punitive damages where the violation was willful. Since 2022 a § 740 claim no longer waives anything else, so it sits next to § 215 and the Human Rights Law rather than replacing them. And because § 740 asks only whether you reasonably believed the employer broke the law, the Governor’s own memorandum, which calls the new statute ambiguous, is the best evidence of reasonableness an employee could ask for. Public employees are covered by § 210-b but should look to Civil Service Law § 75-b rather than § 740 for whistleblower protection.

What counts as your personnel file

The statute defines “personnel record” as a record kept by an employer that identifies an employee, to the extent it is used, has been used, or may affect or be used relative to the employee’s qualifications for employment, promotion, transfer, additional compensation or disciplinary action.

Two features of that definition matter, and they pull in opposite directions.

Two definitions widen the reach. “Employee” means a person currently or formerly employed, so former employees have the same rights. “Employer” means any individual, corporation, partnership, labor organization, unincorporated association or other legal business, including governmental entities and public employers, and the employer’s agents.

New York went further than the law it copied

The sponsor memo says the section is modeled on Massachusetts General Laws chapter 149, section 52C. It is, nearly word for word, with one deletion that matters. Massachusetts ties its retention rule and its list of what the file must contain to employers with twenty or more employees. New York dropped the threshold. A two-person office in Huntington Station has the same ten-day notice duty and the same three-year retention duty as a hospital system.

New York also added a clause Massachusetts does not have. Threatening to call immigration authorities about an employee, or about the employee’s family or household, is named as retaliation in the text of the statute itself.

How to use it

One warning about the written statement. It will be read by future employers, agencies and juries. Keep it short and factual, state dates and names, and leave out the adjectives.

For employers

If you run a business on Long Island, you have until November 8, 2026, to build three things.

Do not wait for the amendment. The Governor’s memo narrows what a file is. It does not touch the notice, the copy, the retention or the retaliation clause, and it will not be law on November 8, 2026.

Subdivision 5 adds that a written personnel policy on terms and conditions of employment, if you have one, must be continuously maintained at the office where personnel matters are administered. Under subdivision 6, the section does not supersede a collective bargaining agreement that already provides at least substantially similar access.

What this changes in a case

Evidence, earlier. Today, a client comes to me after a termination with a story and a few emails, and the file that explains what the employer was actually thinking arrives months later in discovery, after an EEOC charge has been filed and a complaint drafted. From November 8, 2026, the client can bring the file to the first meeting. We can see the pretext before we plead it.

Timing. The 10-day notice means you learn about a write-up when it goes in, not eighteen months later. An employee who answers a false warning in the file, in writing, within days, has changed the record before the termination is engineered around it. In a discrimination case, the question is often whether the stated reason for a firing is the real one. A file holding the employer’s warning and the employee’s contemporaneous rebuttal is a very different exhibit from the warning alone.

Retaliation. Requesting your file is now a protected activity. If you ask for it and your hours are cut or your next review suddenly turns negative, the sequence itself is evidence. We wrote earlier this year about the rise in workplace retaliation claims, and this law adds one more protected act to the list.

The “we don’t have that anymore” problem. Employers sometimes tell us the old evaluations were purged or lost in a system migration. The three-year retention rule, with its no-deletions language, closes that door for anyone who left within the window.

Wage claims. The file must contain your rate of pay and other compensation, your job title and description, and your start date. Those are the first three facts in any wage and hour claim, and today employees often reconstruct them from pay stubs and memory.

None of this shortens the litigation itself. An employment case still takes the time we described in our post on how long an employment lawsuit takes. What the law shortens is the part before the case starts, when the employee is guessing about what the employer knows.

Sources

• New York State Senate, S.3460 (2025-2026 session), bill text, sponsor memo and legislative history: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S3460
• Governor’s office, September 9, 2026 signing announcement (A.2107/S.3460 with the Construction Reporting Pay Act and the union-impersonation bill): https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-signs-legislation-improve-safety-and-prosperity-workers-new-york-state-during
• The Governor’s approval memo, as quoted in the National Law Review’s report on the signing: https://natlawreview.com/article/new-york-state-mandates-employee-access-personnel-records
• Massachusetts General Laws c. 149, § 52C, the model statute: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXXI/Chapter149/Section52C
• New York Labor Law § 215 (retaliation): https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/215
• New York Labor Law § 740 (whistleblower protection): https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/740

---

For as long as I have practiced, the personnel file has been the employer’s document about you that you were not allowed to read. On November 8, 2026, it becomes your document too. Ask for it, read it, and answer what is wrong in it while you still can.

Call 516-750-0595 or request a free case review if you were never told about a negative entry in your file, if your employer refuses to produce it, or if something changed at work after you asked.