Why Trust This Analysis
This article is part of our ongoing damages coverage, with 8 published articles analyzing damages issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Personal injury cases often involve complex questions about the extent of damages a plaintiff has suffered. One common dispute that arises is whether expert witness testimony is required to establish the nature and scope of these damages. While expert testimony can be valuable in complicated cases involving technical medical issues, New York courts have made clear that it’s not always necessary — particularly when the injuries and their consequences are straightforward enough for a jury to understand without specialized knowledge.
The Third Department’s recent decision in Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC provides important guidance on this issue, clarifying when plaintiffs can rely on their own testimony and medical records rather than expensive expert witnesses to prove their damages. This ruling has significant implications for how personal injury attorneys approach proof of damages in cases involving clear-cut injuries.
Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:
Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 02687 (3d Dept. 2020)
“Turning to the issue of damages, we reject Yugo’s contention that Supreme Court erred in not requiring expert testimony to prove plaintiffs’ damages. Generally speaking, “expert testimony is appropriate when it serves to clarify an issue that is beyond the ken of the lay juror and calls for professional or technical knowledge” (Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 74 ; see generally De Long v County of Erie, 60 NY2d 296, 307 ).
Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win
Does this apply to your situation?
Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.
Here, there is no question that the injuries that plaintiffs’ sustained were a direct result of the fall precipitated by the deck collapse (see Madsen v Merola, 288 AD2d 520, 521 ). Moreover, plaintiffs’ testimony regarding the nature and permanency of their injuries, coupled with the medical records introduced into evidence, were not beyond the competence of plaintiffs or the ordinary experience and knowledge of a lay jury so as to require expert testimony to render an appropriate damages award (see Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d at 74; compare Razzaque v Krakow Taxi, 238 AD2d 161, 162 )“
Key Takeaway
The Zapata decision reinforces that expert witness testimony is not automatically required to prove damages in personal injury cases. When injuries are straightforward and the connection between the incident and damages is clear, plaintiffs can rely on their own testimony combined with medical records. This can significantly reduce litigation costs while still allowing for appropriate damage awards.
Related Articles
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.
Keep Reading
More Damages Analysis
Mental Health Damages in Personal Injury Claims: Long Island's Growing Recognition in 2026
PTSD, anxiety, and depression from accidents are now compensable in Long Island personal injury cases.
May 11, 2026
NY Archdiocese $800 Million Settlement: A Clergy Abuse Lawyer's Guide for Survivors
The proposed $800 million New York Archdiocese settlement covers about 1,300 Child Victims Act claimants.
May 3, 2026
$5 Million Verdict Affirmed for Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivor Under NY Survivors Act
NY appellate court affirms $5M verdict for childhood sexual abuse survivor under the Survivors Act. Learn your rights.
Feb 18, 2026
Punitive damages in medical malpractice case
New York court allows punitive damages in medical malpractice cases when doctors alter or destroy records to evade liability, serving deterrence and public policy.
Jan 18, 2018
Proof of damages
Learn how oral testimony alone can establish proof of damages in construction cases, even without documentary evidence, based on witness knowledge and experience.
Aug 27, 2015
This one fell under the radar
Expert analysis of NY PIP interest tolling under 65-3.9(d). Learn how procedural delays can cost thousands in Long Island & NYC cases. Call 516-750-0595.
Jan 17, 2012Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a damages matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
