Default judgment vacated
Court vacates default judgment due to insufficient proof under CPLR 3215, requiring personal knowledge affidavits and verified complaints for proper establishment.
Default judgment vacated — Read More →31 articles published in May 2015
The articles below were published in May 2015 by Attorney Jason Tenenbaum and the legal team at his Long Island law office. Each article provides detailed analysis of real court decisions, statutory developments, and procedural issues in New York personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment law.
Attorney Tenenbaum has maintained this legal blog since 2008, creating one of the most comprehensive public archives of New York insurance and personal injury case law analysis available online. Every article draws on his firsthand experience litigating cases in Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts, New York City Civil Court, and the Appellate Term. Unlike generic legal content, these articles cite specific case holdings, analyze judicial reasoning, and identify practical takeaways for attorneys and claimants navigating New York's complex legal landscape.
Whether you are an attorney researching a procedural question, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your legal rights after an accident or workplace dispute, this archive offers substantive legal analysis grounded in real New York courtroom experience. For case-specific legal advice, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Court vacates default judgment due to insufficient proof under CPLR 3215, requiring personal knowledge affidavits and verified complaints for proper establishment.
Default judgment vacated — Read More →NY court rules insurer failed to establish timely denial defense for fraudulent procurement claim, highlighting ongoing debates in no-fault insurance law.
Fraudulent procurement defense precluded — Read More →A simple spelling error in an IME scheduling letter caused an insurance company's no-show defense to collapse, highlighting the importance of accurate patient identification.
IME no-show defense folds — Read More →Court rules motorcycle passenger thrown from bike but struck by it again remains "occupying" vehicle for no-fault insurance exclusion purposes in complex accident case.
On the motorcycle and hit again – Is there coverage? — Read More →Court distinguishes Alrof-Safeco case, finding competent evidence of IME no-show through physician affirmation and scheduler affidavit with personal knowledge of office practices.
A distinction between Alrof-Safeco and reality — Read More →First Department ruling on prima facie case requirements in no-fault insurance, waiver of assignment defenses, and discovery limitations in provider claims.
The prima facie case in the First Department and sinking of a disclosure based defense — Read More →Court clarifies that insurance companies don't need to notify healthcare providers when scheduling Independent Medical Examinations under New York No-Fault law.
IME letters do not need to be sent to provider — Read More →Court ruling shows insurance companies must provide detailed affidavits about mail handling procedures to prove 45-day rule violations in no-fault claims disputes.
45-day rule in action (or inaction) — Read More →A New York appellate court reminds judges to maintain judicial dignity after criticizing a Staten Island judge's colorful opinion writing style in a no-fault insurance case.
Taking a stab at our respected jurist from Staten Island — Read More →Court upholds $4,000 to $645.90 fee schedule reduction for CPT code 20553, explaining Ground Rule methodology and potential carrier recoupment analysis.
Another old fee schedule 20553 reduction case — Read More →Court rules affidavits lacking personal knowledge of patient no-shows insufficient to dismiss no-fault insurance claims, requiring stronger evidence standards.
Affidavits of no show are insufficient — Read More →NY appellate court decisions create triable issues of fact with boilerplate affidavits claiming verification materials were mailed to insurance carriers.
Boilerplate affidavit mandates triable issue of fact on verification issue — Read More →Court finds EUO no-shows invalid due to unclear circumstances and potential rescheduling, with Civil Court judges granting plaintiff summary judgment in multiple cases.
What was the other basis for finding the EUO no shows are invalid? — Read More →New York court requires medical evidence, not just "know it all" affidavits, to challenge IME reports in no-fault medical necessity disputes.
Medical necessity motion: the door has creaked open a little bit — Read More →New York court rules insurers don't need objective justification for EUO requests under No-Fault Regulation 68, emphasizing compliance importance.
Objective justification not necessary — Read More →Court ruling on EUO scheduling letters and verification requests in NY no-fault insurance claims, examining when denials are timely and service billing disputes.
Were the services billed for? — Read More →Court strikes no-fault complaint for discovery violation despite minimal prejudice to defendant - analysis of CPLR 3126 sanctions and reasonable excuse standards.
Complaint stricken on discovery violation – wait until the shoe is on the other foot — Read More →Court rejects insurance carrier's argument that chiropractor's 5% billing company fee constitutes ownership under Mallela doctrine in New York no-fault case.
Tenuous Mallela claim denied — Read More →Understanding when appeals are prohibited in New York courts - a crucial reminder about vacated judgments and orders in no-fault insurance cases.
No right to appeal. — Read More →Appellate court corrects trial court's dismissal with prejudice ruling in mortgage foreclosure case, emphasizing proper application of procedural dismissal standards.
The dismissal should have been without prejudice — Read More →Court case analysis of CPLR 308(2) service requirements showing successful traverse of default judgment based on improper mailing to wrong address despite valid personal service.
CPLR 308(2) in action – the successful traverse — Read More →Progressive insurance company fails to prove proper mailing of claim denials, court finds insufficient evidence of standard office procedures in NY no-fault case.
Progressive cannot prove they mailed documents — Read More →Court rules hospital records admissible as party admissions even when not germane to medical treatment, expanding evidence rules beyond business records exception.
The hospital record admission is admissible (not necessarily as a business record) — Read More →New York court ruling on missing witness charges in civil trials - when courts should instruct juries to draw adverse inferences from a party's failure to call expected witnesses.
The missing witness charge — Read More →Portfolio Recovery case shows how CPLR 4518(a) business records rule applies to assigned debt collection, allowing self-authenticating statements and affidavits of sale as evidence.
Watering down 4518(a) to historic lows — Read More →MVAIC coverage dispute: Appellate Division reverses denial for hit-and-run victim who made reasonable efforts to identify driver after realizing injury severity.
MVAIC: you must provide coverage — Read More →Learn the critical timing and location rules for venue transfer motions in New York courts, including common procedural pitfalls that can derail your case.
Where venue motion is to be brought — Read More →Pennsylvania law allows insurers to rescind policies for misrepresentation, but innocent third parties retain protection rights despite the rescission.
Proofs insufficient under PA law — Read More →Court ruling highlights the critical difference between claiming you mailed documents and proving proper mailing procedures in no-fault insurance claims.
Non-Receipt and medical necessity — Read More →Court rules that making a timely default judgment application protects plaintiffs from CPLR 3215(c) dismissal, even if the application ultimately fails.
Dismissal for failure to take a default itself failed — Read More →Court rejects insurance company's EUO no-show defense, citing flawed Alrof precedent that misrepresents examination under oath requirements in no-fault cases.
Alrof strikes — Read More →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes legal analysis on a regular basis covering developments in New York personal injury litigation, no-fault insurance disputes, employment discrimination, and related practice areas. Attorney Tenenbaum started writing about New York case law in 2008, and the blog has grown into a library of over 2,353 articles analyzing court decisions from the Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals.
Topics frequently covered include the prima facie case standard in no-fault actions, the 30-day preclusion rule under Insurance Regulation 192, IME and EUO no-show defenses, summary judgment practice under CPLR 3212, default judgment standards, verification and claims submission procedures, and the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law Section 5102(d). Employment law articles address wrongful termination, workplace discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, wage and hour violations, and employer retaliation claims.
Each article is written for a professional audience but remains accessible to non-lawyers seeking to understand how New York courts handle specific legal issues. The firm serves clients across Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. If you have a legal question about any topic covered in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential consultation.
New York's civil court system is one of the most complex in the nation, with multiple overlapping jurisdictions that affect how personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment cases are litigated. The New York City Civil Court handles claims up to $25,000 in the five boroughs, while the District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk Counties handle similar matters on Long Island. For claims exceeding $25,000, the Supreme Court serves as the primary trial court with unlimited monetary jurisdiction. Despite its name, the Supreme Court is not the highest court in New York — that distinction belongs to the Court of Appeals, which sits in Albany and decides approximately 200 cases per year.
Appeals from Civil Court and District Court decisions go to the Appellate Term, which is divided into departments corresponding to the Appellate Division. The Appellate Term for the Second Department — which covers Nassau County, Suffolk County, Kings County (Brooklyn), Queens County, and Richmond County (Staten Island) — hears hundreds of no-fault insurance appeals each year and has developed a substantial body of case law on topics including timely denial, verification procedures, proof of mailing, fee schedule disputes, and medical necessity standards. The Appellate Division, Second Department, hears appeals from Supreme Court and from the Appellate Term, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts within its jurisdiction.
Understanding where your case falls within this system is critical. A no-fault insurance dispute involving a $3,000 medical bill will follow a very different procedural path than a $500,000 personal injury claim arising from the same automobile accident. The former is typically resolved through mandatory arbitration before the American Arbitration Association under Insurance Department Regulation 68, while the latter proceeds through Supreme Court with full discovery, independent medical examinations under CPLR 3121, depositions, and potentially a jury trial. Attorney Tenenbaum has practiced extensively in all of these venues and understands the strategic considerations unique to each.
Several statutes and regulations appear frequently in the articles archived on this page. Insurance Law Article 51 establishes New York's no-fault insurance framework, requiring every motor vehicle policy to include personal injury protection benefits covering medical expenses, lost earnings (up to $2,000 per month), and other basic economic loss up to $50,000 per person. 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 (Insurance Regulation 192) imposes a 30-day deadline on insurers to pay or deny no-fault claims after receiving proof of claim and all demanded verification, and the failure to timely deny results in preclusion of most coverage defenses.
In personal injury litigation, Insurance Law Section 5102(d) defines the categories of "serious injury" that a plaintiff must establish before recovering non-economic damages in a motor vehicle accident case. The nine categories — death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, fracture, loss of a fetus, permanent loss of use, permanent consequential limitation, significant limitation of use, and the 90/180-day category — each have specific evidentiary requirements that have been refined through decades of appellate decisions. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has litigated serious injury threshold motions in hundreds of cases and regularly writes about new developments in this area.
Employment claims in New York implicate both state and federal statutes. The New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law Section 296) prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, and domestic violence victim status. The New York City Human Rights Law provides even broader protections and applies a more liberal standard. At the federal level, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act provide additional protections but are subject to administrative exhaustion requirements through the EEOC.
Workers' compensation cases in New York are governed by the Workers' Compensation Law and administered by the Workers' Compensation Board. Injured workers are entitled to medical treatment, lost wage benefits (typically two-thirds of the average weekly wage, subject to a statutory maximum), and permanency awards for lasting disabilities. Third-party claims — such as personal injury lawsuits against property owners or general contractors under Labor Law Sections 200, 240, and 241 — often run parallel to workers' compensation proceedings and involve complex lien and subrogation issues that require experienced legal counsel to navigate properly.
The articles in this archive analyze real decisions from courts across New York State, with a particular focus on the Appellate Term and Appellate Division decisions that establish binding precedent for trial courts on Long Island and in New York City. Whether you are an attorney preparing a motion, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your rights, these articles provide the detailed legal analysis that generic legal websites simply cannot offer. For personalized advice about your specific situation, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. serves clients from its office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. The firm represents individuals and businesses throughout Long Island — including the towns of Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton, Huntington, and Oyster Bay in Suffolk County, and the cities and villages of Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa, and Levittown in Nassau County. The firm also handles cases in all five boroughs of New York City: Queens, Brooklyn (Kings County), Manhattan (New York County), the Bronx, and Staten Island (Richmond County). Court appearances are regularly made at Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, the Suffolk County District Court, and the New York City Civil Court throughout the five boroughs.
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.