Summary judgment granted as to negligence yet “sole proximate cause” and comparative negligence left as open questions

If you were injured due to someone else’s careless actions, we understand the challenges you may be facing. As a victim or a surviving family member, you could be dealing with the life-altering consequences of a serious accident.

Potter v Stevens Van Lines, Inc., 2013 NY Slip Op 06474 (4th Dept. 2013)

“Plaintiff commenced this negligence action seeking damages for injuries he sustained in a motor vehicle accident. It is undisputed that plaintiff’s vehicle collided with a vehicle operated by David J. Fisk (defendant) and owned by defendant Stevens Van Lines, Inc. when plaintiff swerved to avoid Fisk’s vehicle that was entering the roadway from a driveway. ”

(1) Summary judgment granted on the issue of Defendant’s negligence, i.e., improperly backing out of the driveway

(2) Summary judgment denied as to whether Defendant’s negligence was sole proximate cause of accident.

Seems interesting the micro issues in the grander scheme of a negligence case that can be culled into a summary judgment motion.  An inchoate siting of 3212(g)?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Print

Latest Article

DON'T ACCEPT LESS THAN WHAT YOU'RE OWED!

Choosing the right legal representation is one of the most critical decisions you can make after an accident.

Partnering with a skilled, experienced, and dedicated personal injury attorney can bolster your case and position you to secure the full financial compensation you’re entitled to.

Our firm is ready to manage every aspect of your case, including negotiations with insurance companies. We reject inadequate settlement offers and relentlessly fight for the maximum compensation you rightfully deserve.

Contact Us – We’re Here to Help


    5-Star Rating on Google