Skip to main content
Attorney fees for cases filed on or after February 4, 2015
Attorney fee

Attorney fees for cases filed on or after February 4, 2015

By Jason Tenenbaum 3 min read

Key Takeaway

New York attorney fee limitations for no-fault insurance cases filed after February 4, 2015, including arbitration rates and maximum fee caps per regulation 11 NYCRR 65-4.6.

This article is part of our ongoing attorney fee coverage, with 16 published articles analyzing attorney fee issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

11 NYCRR 65-4.6

The following limitations shall apply to the payment by insurers of applicants’ attorney’s fees for services necessarily performed in the resolution of no-fault disputes:

(a) If an arbitration was initiated or a court action was commenced by an attorney on behalf of an applicant and the claim or portion thereof was not denied or overdue at the time the arbitration proceeding was initiated or the action was commenced, no attorney’s fees shall be granted.

(b) If the claim is resolved by the designated organization at any time prior to transmittal to an arbitrator and it was initially denied by the insurer or overdue, the payment of the applicant’s attorney’s fee by the insurer shall be limited to 20 percent of the total amount of first-party benefits and any additional first-party benefits, plus interest thereon, for each applicant with whom the respective parties have agreed and resolved disputes, subject to a maximum fee of $1,360.

Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win

Does this apply to your situation?

Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.

(c) For disputes subject to arbitration or court proceedings, where one of the issues involves a policy issue as enumerated on the prescribed denial of claim form (NYS form NF-10), subject to this section, the attorney’s fee for the arbitration or litigation of all issues shall be limited to a fee of up to $70 per hour, subject to a maximum fee of $1,400. In addition, an attorney shall be entitled to receive a fee of up to $80 per hour for each personal appearance before the arbitration forum or court.

(d) For all other disputes subject to arbitration or court proceedings, subject to the provisions of subdivision (a) of this section, the attorney’s fee shall be limited as follows: 20 percent of the total amount of first-party benefits and any additional first-party benefits, plus interest thereon, for each applicant per arbitration or court proceeding, subject to a maximum fee of $1,360. If the nature of the dispute results in an attorney’s fee that could be computed in accordance with the limitations prescribed in both subdivision (c) and this subdivision, the higher attorney’s fee shall be payable.

(e) Notwithstanding the limitations specified in this section, if the arbitrator or a court determines that the issues in dispute were of such a novel or unique nature as to require extraordinary skills or services, the arbitrator or court may award an attorney’s fee in excess of the limitations set forth in this section. An excess fee award shall detail the specific novel or unique nature of the dispute that justifies the award. An excess award of an attorney’s fee by an arbitrator shall be appealable to a master arbitrator.

(f) If a dispute involving an overdue or denied claim is resolved by the parties after it has been forwarded to the conciliation center of the appropriate arbitration forum or after a court action has been commenced, the attorney for the applicant shall be entitled to a fee, which shall be computed in accordance with the limitations set forth in this section.

(g) No attorney shall demand, request or receive from the insurer any payment of fees not permitted by this section.

(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section and with respect to billings on and after the effective date of this regulation, if the charges by a health care provider, who is an applicant for benefits, exceed the limitations contained in the schedules established pursuant to section 5108 of the Insurance Law, no attorney’s fee shall be payable by the insurer. This provision shall not be applicable to charges that involve interpretation of such schedules or inadvertent miscalculation or error.

filed Jan. 20, 2015 eff. Feb. 4, 2015.

Attorneys should be aware of the Appellate Division Rules prohibiting fees in connection with the collection of first-party no-fault benefits (22 NYCRR sections 603.7(e)(7), 691.20(e)(7), 806.13(f) and 1022.31(f)).


Legal Update (February 2026): The attorney fee limitations and hourly rates specified in 11 NYCRR 65-4.6 may have been amended since this post’s publication in 2015, as the Department of Financial Services periodically updates fee schedules and maximum compensation amounts. Practitioners should verify current fee limitations, hourly rates, and maximum fee caps under the regulation’s current provisions.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

Was this article helpful?

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a attorney fee matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filed under: Attorney fee
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

Reviewed & Verified By

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (13)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

CA
Captain America
This is exactly what happened in NAZI Germany. They screwed the lawyers first. More broken glass … can you hear it break folks. And as litigation fades away I can see those droves of highly skilled marketable no fault defense attorneys begging for a job doing doc review and being rejected as being under qualified.
WC
Wang Chung
This is ahhhhh … Wang Chung. That big fuckeee Wynney takey big bribey from insurwance industreee. That for sureeeey
JE
joel epstein
Is section (h) saying that if the carrier fails to preserve the fee schedule defense and therefore the provider is awarded more than the fee schedule allows, then the attorney does not get the attorney fees?
KL
Kurt Lundgren
Wonder if some of the drafters would prefer to write in crayon?
AK
Alan Klaus
I dont see anything so different or bad for Plaintiff Attys. It raises the max fee. Regarding H, at the hearing amend to the proper fee and you will get paid.
AM
Alan M. Elis
Joel, I told Financial Services (in my comments on the proposed amendment) that subsection (h) should be removed as being superfluous. But, the subsection still exists.
JL
Jared Levy
Kurt’s correct. The 60/80 minimum was removed as a quid pro quo for raising the maximum. The theory is that frivilous low-dollar amount claims will disappear as plaintiff’s now have an incentive to file more consolidated actions. Less man-hours, less cases. No more waiting until 2047 to get a trial in Queens Civil. …in theory.
JE
Joel Epstein
The minimum is gone to prevent very small claims, I guess.
KL
Kurt Lundgren
The minimum is removed to screw plaintiff attorneys and save the carriers money. Converse … less cases for defense attorneys.
J
JT Author
And with the so-called “in-house epidemic”, JT is out trying plaintiff medical malpractice cases for weeks and months at a time. Perhaps, I have really lost my mind this time.
KL
Kurt Lundgren
No JT- your mind is probably just misplaced, not lost. Mine usually ends up in the sock drawer where my wife put it.
ML
Missy Lunde
Hey Lue, I found a blank fillable “2004 NY NF-6” here:form NF 6.
AK
Alan Klaus
I still havent seen a case that says that the $1,360 max is for cases filed after 2/5/15. The way I read it it is for any case settled after the change. Not when it was filed. If any can disprove this please advise. Thx

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Review Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Free Consultation Free Case Review