Why Trust This Analysis
This article is part of our ongoing declaratory judgment action coverage, with 227 published articles analyzing declaratory judgment action issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Procedural motions can significantly impact the timeline and strategy of litigation. One common tactical move involves requesting a stay of proceedings when related litigation is pending elsewhere. However, courts don’t automatically grant such requests — they must evaluate whether the circumstances truly warrant delaying the current action.
The decision in Ingram v Miller illustrates how courts analyze motions to stay proceedings when a declaratory judgment action is pending in another case. Under CPLR 2201, courts have discretion to grant stays “in a proper case,” but this discretion isn’t unlimited. The key factor often becomes whether the parties and issues in the separate actions are sufficiently related to justify the delay.
Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:
Ingram v Miller, 2014 NY Slip Op 01296 (2d Dept. 2014)
“Except where otherwise prescribed by law, the court in which an action is pending may grant a stay of proceedings in a proper case, upon such terms as may be just” (CPLR 2201; see Morreale v Morreale, 84 AD3d 1187, 1188). Here, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to stay all proceedings in the subject actions pending resolution of an action commenced by a codefendant’s insurer seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment regarding insurance coverage for the codefendant. The parties in the declaratory judgment action were not sufficiently identical to, or overlapping with, the parties in these actions to warrant a stay”
Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win
Does this apply to your situation?
Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.
Key Takeaway
Courts will deny motions to stay proceedings when the parties in related actions don’t sufficiently overlap. Even when insurance coverage issues are being litigated separately, the lack of identical or substantially overlapping parties means the separate action won’t necessarily resolve the issues in the current case, making a stay inappropriate under CPLR 2201.
Related Articles
- Legal Document Quality Issues in New York Personal Injury Cases: Lessons from Global Liberty Insurance v. Tyrell
- First Department upholds EUO DJ victory
- DJ denial reversed: A misspelling can be excused, and notice to the attorney is enough
- Declaratory judgment action and Special proceeding are identical – dismissal denied
- Denial of Claims
Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2014 post, CPLR 2201 and related procedural rules governing stays of proceedings may have been subject to amendments or judicial interpretation developments. Practitioners should verify current provisions regarding discretionary stays in declaratory judgment actions and review recent case law interpreting the “proper case” standard for stay motions.
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.
About This Topic
Declaratory Judgment Actions in Insurance Law
Declaratory judgment actions under CPLR 3001 allow insurers and claimants to obtain a judicial determination of their rights under an insurance policy before or during the course of litigation. In the no-fault context, carriers frequently seek declaratory judgments on coverage, fraud, and policy procurement issues. These articles analyze the procedural requirements, strategic considerations, and substantive standards governing declaratory judgment practice in New York insurance disputes.
227 published articles in Declaratory Judgment Action
Keep Reading
More Declaratory Judgment Action Analysis
How to Talk to a Judge in New York: What to Say, What to Avoid, and How to Present Yourself
Address the judge as 'Your Honor,' stand when you speak, wait to be recognized, and keep answers short and honest. A Long Island trial lawyer explains.
Feb 24, 2026
CPLR § 2106 Amendment Eliminates Affidavit Notarization Requirement: What This Means for New York Litigation
New York's CPLR 2106 permits affirmations in place of many sworn documents. See the 2024 and 2025 changes, exceptions, and historical case notes.
Feb 18, 2026
CPLR § 2309(c): Out-of-State Affidavits & Certificate Requirements in NY Courts
Learn about CPLR § 2309(c) requirements for out-of-state affidavits in New York courts. Andromeda case analysis & best practices for Long Island attorneys.
Aug 14, 2009
When the Judgment Conflicts With the Decision, the Decision Controls: A $181.50 No-Fault Appeal
A no-fault appeal over $181.50 shows the New York rule that when a judgment conflicts with the decision, the decision controls — and what the fight costs.
Sep 16, 2016
CPLR 2004 allows an order to show cause to be served tardy – first holding for this proposition of law
Third Department rules CPLR 2004 allows courts to extend order to show cause service deadlines retroactively, establishing new precedent for tardy service extensions.
Jan 22, 2014
Understanding CPLR 5019(a) Limitations: Why Courts Cannot Modify Judgment Amounts Based on Substantive Reasons
Mount Sinai rejected substantive policy-limit relief under CPLR 5019(a). St. Barnabas had reserved that procedural question, not approved the mechanism.
Feb 12, 2011Was this article helpful?
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a declaratory judgment action matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
