A bill delay for an EUO is insufficient to toll the claims determination period

If you were injured due to someone else’s careless actions, we understand the challenges you may be facing. As a victim or a surviving family member, you could be dealing with the life-altering consequences of a serious accident.

East Coast Acupuncture, P.C. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51229(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)

“With respect to the unpaid portions of the remaining bills which defendant claims were timely denied based upon the fee schedules, the letters from defendant to plaintiff which were annexed to defendant’s motion papers and which advised plaintiff that the processing of its bills was being delayed pending an examination under oath were insufficient to toll the 30-day period within which defendant was required to pay or deny those bills (see Insurance Law § 5106 [a]; Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65-3.5 [a]; see also Westchester Med. Ctr. v Lincoln Gen. Ins. Co., 60 AD3d 1045 [2009])”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Print

One Response

  1. Compare this case to Unitrin v. Bayshore. Evidenly EUOs are subject to the preclusion rule while IME’s stand on a differnt footing. This does not make sense and the Court of Appeals should clarify the issue instead of walking away as they did in Unitrin. No-fault Law is now in state of flux.

Latest Article

DON'T ACCEPT LESS THAN WHAT YOU'RE OWED!

Choosing the right legal representation is one of the most critical decisions you can make after an accident.

Partnering with a skilled, experienced, and dedicated personal injury attorney can bolster your case and position you to secure the full financial compensation you’re entitled to.

Our firm is ready to manage every aspect of your case, including negotiations with insurance companies. We reject inadequate settlement offers and relentlessly fight for the maximum compensation you rightfully deserve.

Contact Us – We’re Here to Help


    5-Star Rating on Google