Skip to main content
The minimum that an affidavit must contain
Affidavits

The Minimum That an Affidavit Must Contain in New York

By Jason Tenenbaum 2 min read

Key Takeaway

Furtow accepted the affidavit's oath recital and jurat on its record. See the decision, current CPLR 2106 alternatives and related New York cases.

This article is part of our ongoing affidavits coverage, with 196 published articles analyzing affidavits issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

Last reviewed: September 2026.

Historical note: Furtow concerns an administered oath; CPLR 2106 now permits a signed perjury affirmation for covered statements, as explained in the current affirmation guide.

The affidavit in Furtow v Jenstro Enterprises, Inc., 75 AD3d 494 (2d Dept 2010) should have been considered. Ching said he was duly sworn; the jurat recorded that he had sworn before a notary, who signed and stamped it. The Second Department accepted that form and reversed the plaintiff’s liability summary judgment. Ching’s account of the rear-end collision raised a factual issue.

What the opinion actually requires

Furtow did not announce an exclusive script. It relied on CPLR 2309(b), which addresses how an oath impresses its obligation on the person taking it, and the presumption that the notary performed the required duties. The affidavit’s form was sufficient on the record presented.

Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win

Does this apply to your situation?

Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.

Check what the witness swore to and what the officer certified. The factual account must also support the motion; a sound jurat cannot supply missing evidence.

The affirmation alternative

Current CPLR 2106 allows any person to sign and affirm a covered statement under New York’s penalties of perjury. Its exceptions include depositions, office oaths and specified-person oaths, and it preserves matrimonial acknowledgment requirements. The rule provides another way to submit covered proof; it does not invalidate a properly sworn affidavit.

Jason’s original comment

Jason’s 2010 shorthand follows. Furtow accepted this form on its record; the court did not prescribe these words as the only valid oath. The current affirmation alternative is addressed above.

The affidavit at a minimum must say this: John Doe, DULY SWORN….

Sworn to before

notary public

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the minimum a New York affidavit must contain?

Furtow accepted an affidavit with a sworn recital and a jurat signed and stamped by the notary. It found that form adequate on the record, not that these exact words are the only permissible oath.

What is a jurat?

A jurat records the officer’s certification that the statement was sworn before the officer. In Furtow, the sworn recital and completed jurat supported acceptance of the affidavit’s form.

Do I still need a notarized affidavit in New York after 2024?

Current CPLR 2106 permits a signed New York perjury affirmation for covered statements. Depositions and specified oaths are excepted, matrimonial acknowledgment requirements remain, and properly sworn affidavits are still available.

Connect to the Encyclopedia

For review of a particular motion, keep the signed reports, supporting records, objections and court orders together and contact the firm. This historical note is general information, not an assessment of an individual case.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

Keep Reading

More Affidavits Analysis

FAQ

How to Talk to a Judge in New York: What to Say, What to Avoid, and How to Present Yourself

Address the judge as 'Your Honor,' stand when you speak, wait to be recognized, and keep answers short and honest. A Long Island trial lawyer explains.

Feb 24, 2026
Evidence

CPLR § 2106 Amendment Eliminates Affidavit Notarization Requirement: What This Means for New York Litigation

New York's CPLR 2106 permits affirmations in place of many sworn documents. See the 2024 and 2025 changes, exceptions, and historical case notes.

Feb 18, 2026
5102(d) issues

Causation, Renewal and a probable trip to the Court of Appeals

New York 5102(d) serious injury analysis: Henry v Peguero on causation proof requirements, renewal motion standards, and First Department appellate divergence.

May 1, 2010
Hypo-technical defects

A new day for decisions…

A.M. Medical concerned a CPLR 3216 prosecution demand, not insurance verification. Compare its old objection period with current CPLR 2101(f).

Dec 10, 2008
Coverage

Walking out of an EUO leads to a disclaimer and a whole lot more

Walking out of an EUO leads to disclaimer and coverage denial. Court rules insured who departed mid-examination breached policy conditions in NY no-fault case.

Jul 17, 2014
Evidence

Oral application granted (untimely papers accepted) and the deeming acceptable of an affirmation of a physician in a different specialty

Court grants oral application accepting untimely expert papers and physician affirmation from different specialty in Buffalo General Hospital case.

Jun 18, 2012
View all Affidavits articles

Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions About This Topic

3 answers from the firm's New York personal-injury and employment-law practice. Click any question to expand.

What is the minimum a New York affidavit must contain?

Furtow accepted an affidavit with a sworn recital and a jurat signed and stamped by the notary. It found that form adequate on the record, not that these exact words are the only permissible oath.

What is a jurat?

A jurat records the officer's certification that the statement was sworn before the officer. In Furtow, the sworn recital and completed jurat supported acceptance of the affidavit's form.

Do I still need a notarized affidavit in New York after 2024?

Current CPLR 2106 permits a signed New York perjury affirmation for covered statements. Depositions and specified oaths are excepted, matrimonial acknowledgment requirements remain, and properly sworn affidavits are still available.

Was this article helpful?

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a affidavits matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

Reviewed & Verified By

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (11)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

RZ
Raymond Zuppa
The langauge is supposed to awaken the consciousness that a lie will have repercussions. It was originally thought of in religious terms but early on — real early on like the 1920s — courts held that it did not have to awaken a religous consciousness but any sort of moral or ethical quandry caused by a lie. (I cite the above case law and it is old) In other words it has to tell you that you are not supposed to lie. Swear + lie = perjury An affidavit still requires an oath — swear or affirm –before a notary and a handwritten signature witnessed by the notary. I spoke with the Department of State about that. I am getting a written opinion. Some idiots still confuse or attempt to pass of the requirements of an acknowledgement as being adequate for an Affidavit. I see some heavy litigation brewing in that area.
J
JT Author
Are you referencing an acknowledgment in the form that is required for a deed to be recorded?
RZ
Raymond Zuppa
Yes but a whole range of other matters too. There are a host of documents where all that is required is that the notary verify that John Doe signed the document without any need for a formal “swearing” or “affirming” to tell the truth. All the notary stamp is supposed to prove is that John Doe is known to the notary — i.e. he shows I.D. — as John Doe and this is his signature. Some morons think or at least argue that a Peer Review Report that is prepared by a doctor — thereby merely affirmed without the need for a notary — is subject to the Electronic Signature law. That’s like an electronic signature on an attorney affirmation or a big fat stamp. You know them J.T. Of course the caselaw says not — as well as the rule itself. It’s applicable to things like traffic tickets. etc. but it should not be since a traffic ticket is a simplified information.
J
JT Author
But an attorney is subject to rule 130, thus the affirmation must be holographic. Otherwise, the Electronic Signature Act and the State Technology law allowing electronic signatures would apply to attorney affirmations. Someone I know has an omnibus motion challenging the electronic signature affirmation presented in a simplified information. The lead case on point is Vista v. Travelers.
RZ
Raymond Zuppa
I don’t see how that is possible J.T. unless you show me. I am well aware of Rule 130. Say there is no rule 130. The Electronic Signature Act and the State Technology Law would not allow an attorney’s affirmation to be electronic. If that were so J.T. an M.D.’s affirmed Peer Review Report — the one that does not require a notary just like our affirmations — could be electronic; and we know (at least most of us) that this is not the case. See your case or one of the Vistas. The same policy applies. An attorney is affirming the truth under penalty of perjury just like a so called M.D. that signs a Peer Review Report. Where does it say that this could be Electronic. Not the statute. I know an attorney’s word is not worth the ink that signs his or her name but sign his affirmation he must.
J
JT Author
I think an electronic signature is proper on a physician affirmation. But, a foundation in accordance with the ESA and the NYSTL must be laid. The reason Rogy and the Vistas went the way they did was because there was no proper foundation for the electronic signature. Vista and Rogy have pretty much taught us what is necessary to lay the appropriate foundation. The purpose of the ESA and NYSTL was to encourage electronic commerce. The legislative intent and practice commentaries memorialize that point. Assuming what you are saying is true, then the act to a large extent would be pointless. I thus respectfully disagree with your analysis.
RZ
Raymond Zuppa
The statutes wanted to aid ministerial acts of commerce. Swearing that someone does not need any further medical treatment although ministerial for an insurance company is not ministerial commerce. Mind you anything and everything is related to commerce. Witness the New Deal and Civil Rights legislation that drew its existence from the commerce clause of the constitution. But swearing without signing — no … no … I am looking forward to a case wherein someone lays a foundation for an electronic signature on a Peer Review Report. M.D. or not it is still an Affidavit. I respectfully state that you have read to much into Vista and Rogy.
J
JT Author
Ray, I would bet a nice sum of money that I am right on this one.
RZ
Raymond Zuppa
Which issue. The lawyer affirmation or the M.D. Peer? I never bet money because if I lose I will not pay and no one is tough enough to make me pay. Just give me chapter and verse. Give me the cite and I’ll look it up. If the law supports your position I will so state here on The Defender with commentary if appropriate.
J
JT Author
Ray, What i was saying is that the law will support my viewpoint. The chapter and verse, when written, will find its way on here!
RZ
Raymond Zuppa
Jason now we know what you are saying. Do me a favor. Some people say that you are just a bright intelligent intellectual with a brilliant future that does very well by his clients; yet a gutless wonder. Well they do not say the last part. I added it. But anyway when this issue comes before you promise me you’ll let me know in advance so that I may have the opportunity to volunteer my bro bono services and write the papers; all the way to the Ct of Appeals. Here is the bet. And I’ll pay up if I lose — dinner at the winner’s favorite restaurant. If I lose and you go ultra expensive I am not eating — I’ll watch; you can do the same.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Review Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Free Consultation Free Case Review