Skip to main content
Long Island traumatic brain injury lawyer — severe TBI from car accident
★★★★★ 4.9 Rating • 200+ Reviews

Long Island Traumatic
Brain Injury
Lawyer

Moderate and severe TBI from car accidents — GCS ≤12, diffuse axonal injury, subdural hematoma, craniotomy — requires expert legal representation to recover lifetime care costs, lost earning capacity, and full compensation. No fee unless we win.

Serving Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County & All of NYC

$100M+

Recovered

24+

Years Experience

$4.2M

Top TBI Result

24/7

Available

Quick Answer

Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury — defined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 3–12 at the scene, loss of consciousness exceeding 30 minutes, or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) lasting more than 24 hours — satisfies New York Insurance Law §5102(d)’s serious injury threshold under the "traumatic brain injury resulting in permanent consequential limitation" category. Unlike concussion/mTBI cases, moderate-to-severe TBI typically presents with objective CT and MRI evidence (hemorrhage, contusion, DAI on DTI sequences), documented surgical intervention, and neuropsychological test scores showing quantified cognitive deficits — providing an evidentiary foundation that supports substantial lifetime care, lost earning capacity, and pain and suffering damages.

Last updated: April 2026 · Every case is unique — these ranges reflect general New York outcomes and are not guarantees.

Traumatic Brain Injury Cases We Handle

What Type of TBI Do You Have?

Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI)

Acute Subdural Hematoma

Epidural Hematoma

Cerebral Contusion

Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Depressed Skull Fracture

Proven Track Record

Traumatic Brain Injury Car Accident Results

When neuroimaging, surgical records, neuropsychological testing, and life care planning are properly assembled, moderate-to-severe TBI cases yield the largest verdicts and settlements in personal injury law.

$4.2M

Severe TBI + Diffuse Axonal Injury

Intersection T-bone collision at 45 mph caused GCS 5 at scene; CT scan showed subarachnoid hemorrhage; MRI with DTI sequences confirmed diffuse axonal injury involving corpus callosum and brainstem; decompressive craniectomy followed by cranioplasty; ICP monitoring post-operatively; plaintiff, a 38-year-old engineer, assessed at Rancho Los Amigos Level IV on discharge — progressed to Level VII with intensive neurorehabilitation; neuropsychological testing documented severe executive function deficits and anterograde amnesia; vocational rehabilitation expert projected $2.1M in lost earning capacity; lifetime nursing and custodial care costs projected at $1.6M by life care planner

$2.8M

Acute Subdural Hematoma + Craniotomy

Rear-end collision at highway speed caused acute subdural hematoma at the frontoparietal junction; GCS 8 at scene; emergency craniotomy performed within 4 hours of impact; ICP monitoring for 7 days; MRI FLAIR sequence confirmed contusion; plaintiff progressed from Rancho Level V to Level VIII over 14 months of inpatient and outpatient TBI rehabilitation; residual left-side hemiparesis and expressive aphasia; neuropsychologist documented permanent deficits in memory encoding and word retrieval; SPECT scan confirmed hypoperfusion in Broca's area

$1.95M

Epidural Hematoma + Depressed Skull Fracture

Head-on collision caused temporal epidural hematoma and depressed skull fracture at the pterion; GCS 9 at scene; emergency surgery required; post-traumatic amnesia exceeded 72 hours; MRI confirmed cerebral contusion at the impact site; plaintiff, a 29-year-old teacher, experienced persistent post-traumatic headaches, cognitive fatigue, and behavioral dysregulation; neuropsychological battery documented significant impairment in working memory and processing speed; treating neurologist opined permanent consequential limitation under §5102(d)

$1.4M

Moderate TBI + Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Sideswipe collision caused GCS 10 at scene with loss of consciousness exceeding 45 minutes; CT scan identified small intracerebral hemorrhage in the right temporal lobe; MRI with FLAIR confirmed perilesional edema; conservative management with ICP monitoring; post-traumatic amnesia exceeded 48 hours; plaintiff developed frontal lobe syndrome with impulsivity, aggression, and emotional dysregulation; SPECT scan confirmed metabolic abnormality in the prefrontal cortex; 90/180-day category satisfied and permanent consequential limitation established through neuropsychological testing over 18 months

$975K

Moderate TBI + Prolonged LOC + Vocational Loss

Rear-end freeway collision caused loss of consciousness for approximately 40 minutes; GCS 11 at scene; CT scan negative for hemorrhage initially; follow-up MRI with DTI showed white matter changes consistent with axonal injury; post-traumatic amnesia documented for 26 hours; plaintiff, a 52-year-old construction supervisor, demonstrated significant executive function impairment on neuropsychological testing — unable to manage complex job site coordination; vocational economist documented $520K in lost earning capacity through retirement; treating neurologist opined permanent significant limitation of brain function satisfying §5102(d)

$680K

Moderate TBI + Behavioral Deficits + 90/180 Category

T-bone collision at intersection caused GCS 12 at scene; post-traumatic amnesia for 28 hours; CT scan showed small cerebral contusion; MRI FLAIR demonstrated signal abnormality; plaintiff developed significant behavioral changes including irritability, impulsivity, and sleep dysregulation requiring psychiatric management; unable to perform substantially all usual daily activities for 127 days within the first 180 days post-accident; treating neuropsychologist documented permanent limitation in executive function satisfying both the 90/180-day category and significant limitation threshold under §5102(d)

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique.

Simple Process

Getting Started Takes 5 Minutes

1

Call or Click

Reach us 24/7 at (516) 750-0595 or fill out our online form. We respond within minutes, even while your family member is still hospitalized.

2

Medical Records Reviewed

We obtain ER records, CT and MRI reports, operative notes, ICP monitoring records, and neurorehabilitation documentation. We identify the GCS classification, PTA duration, and imaging findings that establish the serious injury threshold under §5102(d).

3

Expert Team Assembled

We retain neurologists, neuropsychologists, life care planners, and vocational economists to quantify lifetime care costs, lost earning capacity, and the full scope of permanent cognitive, behavioral, and physical deficits.

4

We Fight. Your Family Recovers.

We manage every aspect of the litigation while your family focuses on rehabilitation and recovery. We do not get paid until you do — and TBI cases are our most important work.

Why Tenenbaum Law for TBI Cases

Built to Handle the Most Complex Brain Injury Cases on Long Island

Moderate and severe TBI cases are the most medically complex and financially significant claims in personal injury law. They require mastery of neuroimaging science, neuropsychological testing methodology, life care planning, and the legal framework of §5102(d)’s TBI-specific threshold category. Jason Tenenbaum has spent 24 years representing catastrophically injured Long Island car accident victims — assembling the expert teams and evidentiary records that these cases demand.

Advanced Neuroimaging: DTI, FLAIR & SPECT

We work with neuroradiology consultants to ensure that MRI with DTI sequences and SPECT imaging are obtained when clinically appropriate, providing objective physiological evidence of axonal disruption and cerebral hypoperfusion that conventional CT cannot document.

Neuropsychological Testing & Validity Protocols

We retain neuropsychologists experienced in TBI litigation who administer comprehensive cognitive batteries with performance validity testing, producing reports that withstand defense challenges of symptom exaggeration and provide the quantified deficit documentation required for maximum damages.

Life Care Planning & Lifetime Damages

We work with certified life care planners to document every element of the plaintiff’s projected lifetime medical and custodial care needs. In severe TBI cases requiring 24-hour nursing supervision, this projection can represent the single largest component of total damages.

★★★★★
“My son was in the ICU for three weeks after a highway collision. The insurance company was offering almost nothing while he was still in rehab. Jason’s office took over, obtained all the neuroimaging and the neuropsychological records, retained a life care planner, and built a complete picture of what his future will look like. The settlement was life-changing for our family. We can actually afford his care.”
D

Diana R.

Severe TBI — LIE (I-495) Collision

What Is Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury?

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is classified by severity using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), which measures eye opening, verbal response, and motor response on a scale from 3 (deepest unconsciousness) to 15 (fully alert). The classifications are: mild TBI (GCS 13–15, including concussion), moderate TBI (GCS 9–12), and severe TBI (GCS 3–8).

This page covers the moderate and severe TBI categories — cases with GCS ≤12 at the scene, loss of consciousness (LOC) exceeding 30 minutes, or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) lasting more than 24 hours. These are categorically distinct from concussion and mild TBI (which are addressed on our Long Island concussion lawyer page). The structural brain injuries that produce GCS scores in the moderate-to-severe range are documented by CT scan and advanced MRI and frequently require neurosurgical intervention.

The specific diagnoses that present in this severity range include: diffuse axonal injury (DAI), acute and chronic subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, cerebral contusion, intracerebral hemorrhage, and depressed skull fracture. Each of these diagnoses has distinct imaging characteristics, surgical treatment requirements, and long-term deficit profiles that shape the legal and damages analysis.

Moderate and Severe TBI Diagnoses: Medical and Legal Significance

Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI)

Diffuse axonal injury is caused by rapid acceleration-deceleration or rotational forces that shear the axonal fibers connecting neurons throughout the brain. It is the pathological basis of the most severe closed-head TBI cases. CT scan may be negative or show only small petechial hemorrhages at the gray-white matter junction; MRI with DTI sequences is required to document the white matter tract disruption. DAI involving the corpus callosum or brainstem reticular activating system is associated with prolonged unconsciousness, vegetative state, and the most severe permanent cognitive and motor deficits.

Acute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) results from tearing of bridging veins between the brain surface and the dural sinuses. It appears as a hyperdense (bright) crescent-shaped collection on CT scan overlying the cortical surface. ASDH with mass effect and midline shift is a neurosurgical emergency requiring emergent craniotomy and evacuation. Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) develops over days to weeks after the initial injury as the acute blood liquefies; it may present with insidious cognitive decline and be managed with burr hole drainage or craniotomy. Both forms can produce permanent motor deficits, cognitive impairment, and behavioral changes.

Epidural Hematoma

Epidural hematoma (EDH) results from arterial bleeding — most commonly from the middle meningeal artery following temporal skull fracture — into the potential space between the dura and the inner surface of the skull. CT scan shows a biconvex (lens-shaped) hyperdense collection. EDH with expanding mass effect can produce rapid neurological deterioration and requires emergent surgical evacuation. The classic “lucid interval” — a period of apparent recovery followed by rapid decline — occurs in a minority of EDH cases. With prompt surgical intervention, prognosis for EDH can be better than for ASDH; however, cases involving significant underlying cortical injury or delayed intervention may result in permanent deficits.

Cerebral Contusion and Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Cerebral contusion is a bruising of the brain parenchyma at the impact site (coup injury) and on the opposite side of the brain (contrecoup injury). Contusions appear as heterogeneous hyperdense and hypodense areas on CT scan; MRI FLAIR sequences show perilesional edema and may reveal contusions invisible on CT. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a focal collection of blood within the brain parenchyma, most commonly in the temporal or frontal lobes. Contusions and ICH produce focal neurological deficits corresponding to the brain region involved: temporal lobe injury causes memory impairment, frontal lobe injury causes executive dysfunction and behavioral dysregulation, and motor cortex injury causes contralateral hemiparesis.

Depressed Skull Fracture

A depressed skull fracture occurs when the fractured bone fragment is displaced inward toward or into the brain parenchyma. Open depressed skull fractures (where the overlying scalp is lacerated) require surgical elevation and debridement due to the risk of intracranial infection. Closed depressed fractures with significant depression (greater than the width of the skull) are typically elevated surgically. The pterion — a thin point at the temporal bone where four skull bones meet — is a common site for depressed fracture in lateral impact collisions and is overlaid by the middle meningeal artery, making it particularly dangerous.

Neurosurgical Procedures: Craniotomy, Decompressive Craniectomy & Cranioplasty

Craniotomy involves removing a section of skull (bone flap) to access and evacuate an intracranial hematoma or address elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). ICP monitoring — via an intraparenchymal probe or external ventricular drain — guides management of cerebral edema in the acute phase. Elevated ICP above 20–25 mmHg is associated with secondary brain injury from ischemia and herniation.

Decompressive craniectomy is the most aggressive surgical intervention for refractory elevated ICP: a large portion of the skull is removed and not replaced immediately, allowing the swollen brain to expand without herniation. The skull defect is subsequently repaired by cranioplasty — replacement with the original bone flap (if preserved) or a custom titanium or PEEK implant. The three-stage surgical course (craniotomy or craniectomy, then cranioplasty) represents months of operative treatment and intensive rehabilitation, producing substantial medical bills and vocational impact evidence for the damages case.

Long-Term Deficits After Moderate and Severe TBI

The permanent deficits following moderate and severe TBI fall into three categories, each of which is legally and financially significant in a personal injury case.

Cognitive Deficits

Executive function impairment — deficits in planning, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control — is the most functionally disabling cognitive consequence of frontal lobe TBI and DAI. Anterograde amnesia (inability to form new memories) resulting from hippocampal and white matter injury prevents return to complex employment. Processing speed deficits affect the ability to manage simultaneous tasks, operate machinery safely, and perform professional responsibilities under time pressure. Neuropsychological testing quantifies each of these domains using standardized batteries (WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, D-KEFS, PASAT) with normative comparisons.

Behavioral and Psychiatric Deficits

Frontal lobe TBI commonly produces behavioral dysregulation: impulsivity, irritability, aggression, emotional lability, and disinhibition. These behavioral changes are often more disabling to employment and family relationships than the cognitive deficits alone, yet they are harder to document objectively. Psychiatric comorbidity — post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder following TBI — is documented by treating psychiatrists and forensic neuropsychologists and contributes to the pain and suffering damages claim.

Physical Deficits

Motor deficits from cortical or subcortical injury produce contralateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia requiring physical therapy and potentially long-term assistive device use. Aphasia — impairment of language production (Broca’s aphasia from dominant frontal lobe injury) or comprehension (Wernicke’s aphasia from dominant temporal lobe injury) — is one of the most devastating physical sequelae and is treated by speech-language pathology. Post-traumatic epilepsy occurs in a significant proportion of severe TBI survivors and requires long-term anticonvulsant management. In the most severe cases, moderate-to-severe TBI can produce a persistent vegetative state (no awareness of environment) or minimally conscious state (inconsistent but reproducible evidence of awareness), requiring 24-hour custodial care at annual costs that can exceed $500,000.

New York Law: Serious Injury Threshold for TBI Under §5102(d)

New York Insurance Law §5102(d) requires a car accident plaintiff to satisfy the serious injury threshold to recover non-economic damages (pain and suffering) from the at-fault driver. In 2012, the Legislature amended §5102(d) to add a specific TBI category: "traumatic brain injury resulting in permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member." This amendment was enacted in recognition that TBI cases were being misclassified under the "significant limitation" and "permanent consequential limitation" categories, which had been developed in the context of orthopedic injuries.

For moderate and severe TBI cases, the threshold is satisfied through a combination of: (a) objective neuroimaging evidence (CT, MRI with FLAIR/DTI, SPECT); (b) documented GCS score at the scene (≤12) and post-traumatic amnesia (>24 hours); (c) documented neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, craniectomy); and (d) neuropsychological testing demonstrating permanent cognitive deficits. The "fracture" category under §5102(d) may also apply in cases involving depressed skull fracture.

The 90/180-day category — requiring that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all usual daily activities for at least 90 days within the first 180 days post-accident — is almost universally satisfied in moderate and severe TBI cases, given the duration of hospitalization and rehabilitation. This category provides an additional threshold basis and supports full economic damages including lost wages during the 180-day period.

Our Long Island car accident lawyer page covers the full range of car accident claims; this page addresses specifically the moderate-to-severe TBI subset where the legal, medical, and damages issues are uniquely complex.

TBI Rehabilitation: Rancho Los Amigos Scale and Recovery Documentation

The Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning (LOCF) Scale is the standard clinical tool for documenting a TBI patient’s cognitive and behavioral recovery trajectory in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation. The scale runs from Level I (No Response: complete absence of observable change in behavior) to Level X (Purposeful, Appropriate: modified independent). Rehabilitation professionals document the patient’s Rancho Level at admission and discharge from each rehabilitation setting, creating a longitudinal record of recovery.

From a legal perspective, the Rancho Level documentation serves two functions: it establishes the severity of the acute injury (a patient admitted to inpatient rehab at Rancho Level III or IV has a documented severe TBI), and it establishes the plateau of recovery (a patient who reaches Level VII or VIII after 18 months of intensive rehabilitation and does not progress to Level X has documented permanent residual deficits). The gap between the achieved Rancho Level and the pre-injury baseline is the functional deficit that the life care plan and vocational analysis must quantify in dollars.

Related practice areas: Car Accident LawyerConcussion LawyerCatastrophic Injury AttorneyWrongful Death LawyerPersonal Injury

Traumatic Brain Injury Case Questions

Answers You Need Right Now

How is a moderate or severe TBI legally different from a concussion claim under New York law?
New York Insurance Law §5102(d) requires a "serious injury" to recover non-economic damages from an at-fault driver. For mild TBI and concussion cases, satisfying the threshold can be challenging because imaging is often negative and symptoms are primarily subjective. Moderate and severe TBI cases — defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 to 12 at the scene, loss of consciousness exceeding 30 minutes, or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) lasting more than 24 hours — present a fundamentally different evidentiary picture. CT scans at the emergency room may show acute subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral contusion, or skull fracture. MRI with FLAIR and DTI sequences can document diffuse axonal injury involving white matter tracts, corpus callosum, or brainstem — findings that are objective, reproducible, and extremely difficult for the defense to dispute. From a threshold standpoint, moderate and severe TBI cases almost always satisfy the "traumatic brain injury resulting in permanent consequential limitation" category under §5102(d) — a category that the Legislature specifically added in 2012 to make clear that TBI is a recognized basis for serious injury claims. Neuropsychological testing over multiple sessions documents the cognitive, behavioral, and functional deficits in a quantified, standardized format that courts and juries can evaluate. SPECT scan demonstrating cerebral hypoperfusion in specific functional regions provides additional objective confirmation. The fundamental legal difference is that a concussion/mTBI case must often fight hard to establish the permanence of invisible injury; a moderate-to-severe TBI case with positive neuroimaging, documented surgical intervention, and Rancho Los Amigos progression records has a built-in objective evidentiary record that changes the litigation dynamics entirely.
What damages can be recovered in a severe TBI car accident case on Long Island?
Severe TBI cases involve some of the largest damage calculations in personal injury law because the injuries are permanent and the plaintiff's lifetime care needs are substantial. Economic damages include: (1) past and future medical expenses — emergency surgery (craniotomy, decompressive craniectomy, cranioplasty), hospital stay, ICU costs, ICP monitoring, inpatient TBI rehabilitation, outpatient neuropsychology, neurology follow-up, physiatry, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy; (2) lifetime nursing care — for plaintiffs who require 24-hour custodial care or assisted living following severe TBI, a life care planner calculates the annual cost of that care over the plaintiff's actuarial life expectancy, often producing multimillion-dollar projections; (3) lost earning capacity — the vocational rehabilitation expert and economist calculate the present value of the income the plaintiff would have earned but for the brain injury, from the date of injury through projected retirement, adjusted for inflation and productivity; (4) vocational rehabilitation costs — retraining, job coaching, and supported employment services; (5) home modification costs — accessibility modifications to the plaintiff's home required by permanent physical deficits. Non-economic damages include past and future pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress for cognitive and behavioral changes that permanently alter the plaintiff's personality and relationships. New York does not cap non-economic damages in personal injury cases, allowing juries to award amounts commensurate with the actual severity of the injury. In catastrophic TBI cases — those involving persistent vegetative state or minimally conscious state — the total damages calculation can reach eight figures when lifetime custodial care is projected at $300,000 to $500,000 per year over a 30- to 40-year life expectancy.
What is the role of neuropsychological testing in a TBI car accident lawsuit?
Neuropsychological testing is one of the most important evidentiary tools in a moderate-to-severe TBI lawsuit. A neuropsychologist administers a standardized battery of tests — typically over 6 to 10 hours in two or more sessions — that measure cognitive domains including: memory (immediate recall, delayed recall, recognition), executive function (planning, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, working memory), processing speed, attention and concentration, visuospatial ability, language and verbal fluency, and behavioral/emotional regulation. The test results are reported in standardized scores referenced to age-matched normative populations, allowing the jury to understand exactly how far below average the plaintiff's performance falls in each cognitive domain. For example, a plaintiff who scored at the 3rd percentile for verbal memory and the 5th percentile for processing speed on the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV has objective, quantified evidence of cognitive impairment far exceeding the subjective reports of symptoms alone. The neuropsychologist also administers validity testing — performance validity tests (PVTs) and symptom validity tests (SVTs) — that assess whether the plaintiff is performing to their genuine best effort. A clean validity profile significantly strengthens the evidentiary weight of the test results against defense challenges of symptom exaggeration. Serial neuropsychological testing — at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-injury — can demonstrate permanent plateau of deficits, addressing the defense argument that the plaintiff will fully recover. For TBI litigation, the neuropsychologist will typically serve as both a treating expert (if they were involved in the plaintiff's rehabilitation) and a forensic expert at trial, making them one of the most valuable witnesses in the case.
How does the insurance company defend against a severe TBI claim?
Even in moderate and severe TBI cases with positive neuroimaging and documented surgical intervention, insurance companies retain expert neurologists, neuropsychologists, and neurosurgeons to contest the extent of permanent impairment and the reasonableness of future care projections. The most common defense strategies include: (1) Pre-existing condition attack — the defense will investigate the plaintiff's prior psychiatric history, alcohol or substance use, prior head injuries, learning disabilities, or attention deficit disorder to argue that the cognitive deficits predated the accident; (2) Malingering or symptom exaggeration — the defense neuropsychologist may challenge the plaintiff's effort on neuropsychological testing, though this attack fails when the plaintiff has clean performance validity test scores; (3) Defense neurological examination (DNE) — similar to the IME in orthopedic cases, the defense retains a neurologist to perform a brief examination and opine that the plaintiff has reached maximum medical improvement with less impairment than the treating team documented; (4) Attack on life care plan projections — the defense life care planner may challenge the necessity or cost of specific care items, particularly 24-hour nursing supervision costs; (5) Apportionment disputes — the defense may argue that a prior accident or pre-existing neurological condition contributed to the plaintiff's current deficits, seeking to apportion a portion of the damages to prior events. Effective preparation for these defenses requires assembling a comprehensive treating team with contemporaneous documentation — treating neurologist, neuropsychologist, physiatrist, speech therapist, and occupational therapist — whose records collectively describe the plaintiff's functional trajectory from the acute hospitalization through the litigation period. The life care planner and vocational economist must be carefully selected and their methodology must withstand Frye scrutiny in New York courts.
What is the statute of limitations for a TBI lawsuit in New York, and are there any exceptions?
The statute of limitations for a personal injury claim arising from a car accident in New York is three years from the date of the accident under CPLR §214. This three-year period applies to moderate and severe TBI claims against private individuals and private vehicle operators. There are several important exceptions and considerations specific to TBI cases. First, if the plaintiff was rendered incapacitated at the time of the accident and remains under a legal disability — a condition that may arise in severe TBI cases involving prolonged altered consciousness or guardianship proceedings — CPLR §208 tolls the statute of limitations during the period of disability, subject to limitations. Second, if the at-fault party was a municipality, county, or other governmental entity, the notice of claim requirement under General Municipal Law §50-e must be filed within 90 days of the accident date, and the lawsuit must be commenced within one year and 90 days. This shorter timeline applies even in severe TBI cases where the plaintiff is hospitalized and unable to act promptly. Third, for accidents involving a minor, the three-year statute of limitations is tolled until the child turns 18. Fourth, in cases where a loved one sustained a fatal TBI, the wrongful death statute of limitations is two years from the date of death — not from the date of injury — under EPTL §5-4.1. Given these variations and the risk that a patient recovering from severe TBI may not be in a position to initiate legal action promptly, families should contact an attorney as early as possible — ideally while the plaintiff is still in the inpatient rehabilitation phase — to ensure that all deadlines are calendared and no procedural rights are forfeited before recovery is even underway.
Free Tool

Free Settlement Calculator

Estimate what your personal injury case may be worth using real New York settlement data and proven calculation methods.

Calculate Your Estimate

Educational tool only. Not legal advice.

Locations

TBI lawyers serving Long Island & NYC

Moderate and severe TBI car accident cases are litigated in Nassau and Suffolk County courts, with treating neurologists, neuropsychologists, and TBI rehabilitation centers across Long Island. This page is the primary guide for traumatic brain injury car accident claims across Nassau, Suffolk, and the five boroughs.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

Reviewed & Verified By

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

GCS ≤12. Craniotomy. Diffuse Axonal Injury. Lifetime Care.

Your Family Deserves Full Compensation for a Severe TBI.

Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury from a car accident is a catastrophic, life-altering event. The insurance company has experts working to minimize every component of the damages. We build the complete evidentiary record — neuroimaging, neuropsychology, life care plan, vocational analysis — to recover what your family actually needs. No fee unless we win. Call us today.

No fee unless we win. Available 24/7. Hablamos Español.

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review