Standing (Stacey Kapeleris)
Court ruling on standing in no-fault insurance claims, assignment of benefits, and injured person's right to retake possession of medical bills.
Standing (Stacey Kapeleris) — Read Article →In-depth legal analysis from Attorney Jason Tenenbaum — covering court rulings, legal standards, and practical guidance on standing under New York law.
Expert Analysis
Standing — the legal right to bring a claim — must be established at the outset of any litigation. In no-fault practice, standing issues frequently involve the validity of assignments of benefits, the corporate status of medical providers, and the capacity of parties to sue or be sued. These articles examine how New York courts analyze standing challenges and the documentary proof required to establish or contest a party's right to maintain an action.
Read Our Standing Articles
Frequently Asked Questions
Standing refers to a party's legal right to bring a claim. In no-fault litigation, the medical provider must demonstrate a valid assignment of benefits from the patient to have standing to sue the insurer directly. Without a proper assignment, the provider lacks standing and the case may be dismissed.
A medical provider typically obtains standing to pursue no-fault benefits through an assignment of benefits signed by the injured person. If the assignment is defective, incomplete, or missing, the insurer can challenge the provider's standing. Courts scrutinize assignment forms carefully, and defects can be fatal to the claim.
Yes. Standing is a threshold jurisdictional issue that can be raised at any stage. If a party lacks standing, the court must dismiss the action regardless of the merits. In no-fault cases, insurers frequently challenge provider standing through summary judgment motions.
Court ruling on standing in no-fault insurance claims, assignment of benefits, and injured person's right to retake possession of medical bills.
Standing (Stacey Kapeleris) — Read Article →
Court rules that assigned medical billing payments can restore standing for no-fault insurance claims when coverage is denied due to causation disputes.
EIP’s payment of assigned billings confers standing back to EIP — Read Article →
McCormack v Maloney case analyzing standing requirements in foreclosure actions, including holder status and note assignment issues in New York courts.
Standing — Read Article →
Court ruling demonstrates strict requirements for establishing familiarity with predecessor business records under CPLR 4518 hearsay exception in foreclosure cases.
Familiarity with predecessor business record practice — Read Article →
NY appellate court criticizes Justice Schack for ignoring precedent on standing defenses in foreclosure cases, ordering case reassignment.
Why follow the law? — Read Article →Need Legal Guidance?
Get a Free Case Evaluation
No fees unless we win. Available 24/7.
New York appellate court ruling shows defendants don't need to explicitly plead lack of standing if their answer denies plaintiff's ownership of foreclosed property.
Standing not expressly pleaded — Read Article →
Court rules that securitizing credit card debt doesn't eliminate the original issuer's standing to sue for unpaid balances, clarifying ownership rights in debt collection.
The securitization of debt does not divest party from having standing to prosecute action — Read Article →
New York court rules on assignment of benefits standing requirements in no-fault insurance case, discussing "on file" statements and claim form requirements.
Unpreserved and without merit — Read Article →
Analysis of B&R Consol. v Zurich case on suing TPAs vs insurance carriers, agency relationships, and vicarious liability under NY Insurance Law § 3420(b).
So you sued the TPA and not the insurance carrier – now what? — Read Article →
Court ruling explores complex standing issues when major medical providers attempt to pursue no-fault insurance claims through assignment of rights.
Major medical provider does not have standing to bring action against no-fault carrier — Read Article →
Urban Radiology v GEICO: Assignment of benefits not required for prima facie case in first-party no-fault actions. Court clarifies trial vs summary judgment standards.
Assignment not necessary to make a prima facie case in an assigned first-party action; Prima Facie case — Read Article →
New precedent protects NYC & Long Island medical providers from post-payment independent contractor challenges in no-fault insurance cases. Call 516-750-0595.
The first application of the new precludable independent contractor rule — Read Article →
Court rules that valid assignment of mortgage note after lawsuit commencement creates proper basis for plaintiff substitution and caption amendment under CPLR rules.
Assignment valid during unresolved lawsuit — Read Article →
NY court rules independent contractor defense sufficient for CPLR 3211(a)(7) dismissal when claim forms identify services rendered by contractor
The independent contractor "defense" is sufficient to non-suit a plaintiff under CPLR 3211(a)(7) — Read Article →
Court rules standing defense waivable in no-fault insurance cases when not properly raised in answer or pre-answer motion, emphasizing proper pleading procedures.
Standing in a direct first party case is waivable — Read Article →
Court ruling highlights that attorney affirmations without personal knowledge lack probative value in no-fault insurance verification disputes.
Spell it out in the affidavit — Read Article →
Learn when New York courts allow motions to amend pleadings to assert standing and capacity defenses. Expert analysis of Aurora Loan Services v Thomas case. Call (516) 750-0595.
Motion seeking leave to amend the answer to seek affirmative defense of lack of standing is proper — Read Article →
Learn why claim forms cannot be corrected nunc pro tunc after litigation begins in New York no-fault cases. Expert legal analysis for Long Island and NYC providers.
A claim form may not be corrected nunc pro tunc following its submission — Read Article →
Learn about proving standing in New York foreclosure cases without assignment. Key legal precedents and defense strategies for Long Island homeowners.
Proving standing without an assignment? — Read Article →
Analysis of standing requirements in foreclosure vs no-fault insurance cases, examining retroactive assignments and legal interest requirements under NY law.
It is Standing Again — Read Article →
Learn about NY signature on file requirements for assignment of benefits forms. Expert analysis of verification procedures and no-fault insurance law.
on file" — Read Article →
Expert analysis of NY business records exception and assignment of benefits requirements. Learn how to avoid costly procedural pitfalls in Long Island and NYC courts.
Assignments and business records – a deadly combination — Read Article →
Understanding the inconsistent disclaimer requirements for Malella defenses versus workers compensation defenses in New York no-fault insurance cases.
Why does a Malella defense surive an untimely disclaimer, while a workers compensation defense doesn't? — Read Article →
Learn how legal standing requirements differ between no-fault insurance and traditional litigation in New York. Expert analysis from experienced NYC and Long Island attorneys.
Standing – the Defense Applied Outside the No-Fault Arena — Read Article →
Learn about legal standing requirements in New York personal injury and insurance cases. Essential guide for Long Island and NYC residents on court access rights.
Understanding Legal Standing in New York: A Comprehensive Guide for Long Island and NYC Residents — Read Article →
Expert analysis of workers compensation defense issues in New York personal injury cases. Understanding no-fault insurance coordination, standing issues, and legal strategies for...
Workers Compensation defense — Read Article →
Complex analysis of insurance priority coverage rules and the two-way street principle in no-fault vs workers compensation cases, examining Westchester Medical Center decision...
It is a two way street — Read Article →
Workers' compensation denial timing requirements and their intersection with no-fault insurance coverage following the Westchester Medical Center case analysis.
The Workers Comp Mess — Read Article →
Understanding Allstate insurance claim denials and Box #16 independent contractor issues in NY. Expert legal guidance for Long Island practitioners. Call 516-750-0595.
Are all of the cards stacked in Allstate’s favor? — Read Article →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes detailed legal analysis on standing and related topics as part of an ongoing commitment to legal education and transparency. Since 2008, Attorney Tenenbaum has written over 2,353 articles examining how New York courts decide cases involving personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and complex litigation matters. Each article is based on an actual court decision and provides the kind of substantive analysis that practitioners and clients need to understand the current state of the law.
Attorney Tenenbaum brings over 24 years of New York litigation experience to every article. His practice spans Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He has handled thousands of cases involving insurance disputes, personal injury claims, and employment law matters, giving him a practical perspective that academic commentators often lack. The articles in this collection reflect that experience, offering readers insight into how judges actually apply legal standards in contested cases.
If you are dealing with a legal issue related to standing or any topic covered on this blog, the firm offers free initial consultations by phone or in person. Call (516) 750-0595 to speak with an attorney, or visit the contact page to submit a case review request online. No fee is charged unless the firm recovers compensation on your behalf. The firm's six attorneys bring over 112 combined years of legal experience and speak English, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Russian, ensuring clients can communicate in the language they are most comfortable with. Attorney Tenenbaum is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts, and he has authored more than 2,353 published legal articles that attorneys, judges, and insurance professionals across the state rely on for guidance.
New York's legal framework for standing matters involves an intricate web of statutes, regulations, and case law that has developed over decades. The state's court system — including the Civil Court, District Courts, Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals — each plays a distinct role in shaping how standing cases are litigated and decided. Trial-level decisions in Nassau County Supreme Court, Suffolk County Supreme Court, and the New York City Civil Courts establish important factual precedents, while appellate rulings create binding legal standards that all lower courts must follow.
The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs procedure in New York civil litigation and contains provisions that directly impact standing cases. CPLR Article 31 establishes the scope and methods of disclosure, including depositions under CPLR 3107, interrogatories under CPLR 3130, and document demands under CPLR 3120. CPLR 3212 provides the standard for summary judgment, requiring the movant to establish a prima facie case through admissible evidence and shifting the burden to the opponent to raise a triable issue of fact. CPLR 3215 governs default judgments, which require proof of service, proof of the facts constituting the claim, and proof of the amount due. Understanding these procedural tools is essential for anyone involved in standing litigation in New York.
Statutes of limitations vary significantly depending on the type of claim. General negligence and personal injury claims carry a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5). Medical malpractice claims have a shortened two-and-a-half-year deadline under CPLR 214-a. Claims against municipalities require a Notice of Claim within 90 days under General Municipal Law Section 50-e. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including the 30-day filing window for applications and the 45-day submission period for provider claims. Employment discrimination claims under the New York State Human Rights Law generally have a three-year statute of limitations, while federal Title VII claims require EEOC filing within 300 days.
The Appellate Term and Appellate Division regularly issue decisions that clarify and refine the legal standards applicable to standing cases. The Second Department, which covers Long Island and parts of New York City, is particularly active in this area. Its decisions on evidentiary standards, burden-shifting frameworks, and procedural requirements directly affect how trial courts evaluate motions and how attorneys prepare their cases. Attorney Tenenbaum monitors these decisions and analyzes them in the articles on this page, providing practitioners with the timely legal commentary they need to stay current.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. is located at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746, centrally situated on Long Island to serve clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. With over 24 years of experience and more than 1,000 appeals written, Attorney Tenenbaum combines deep legal knowledge with practical courtroom experience. If you need help with a standing matter, call (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Successful outcomes in standing cases often depend on procedural compliance as much as substantive merit. In no-fault insurance litigation, the prima facie case standard requires the plaintiff to submit admissible evidence establishing the claim was properly submitted, overdue, and unpaid. If the defendant raises a defense — such as an IME no-show, EUO non-appearance, lack of medical necessity, or fee schedule dispute — the burden shifts to the plaintiff to present evidence creating a triable issue of fact. Summary judgment motions under CPLR 3212 require the movant to make a prima facie showing through affidavits, deposition testimony, or documentary evidence, and the opposition must raise a genuine factual dispute to avoid dismissal.
In personal injury cases, the discovery process is governed by CPLR Article 31 and involves depositions of parties and witnesses, exchange of medical records under CPLR 3121 authorizations, physical and mental examinations, and expert disclosure. Once discovery is complete, either party may file a note of issue certifying readiness for trial, after which a 120-day deadline applies for filing summary judgment motions under CPLR 3212(a). Motion practice often determines the outcome of cases before trial, and understanding the specific evidentiary standards applied by courts in your jurisdiction is essential. The articles on this page analyze these standards in detail, drawing on real cases litigated by Attorney Tenenbaum and decisions from courts across the state.
The firm serves clients throughout Long Island, including the towns and villages of Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, and Massapequa, as well as all five boroughs of New York City. Attorney Tenenbaum regularly appears in Nassau County Supreme Court, Suffolk County Supreme Court, the New York City Civil Court, the American Arbitration Association, the Workers' Compensation Board, and the Appellate Term and Appellate Division of the Second Department. If you need legal assistance with a standing matter or any topic discussed in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential case evaluation.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. was founded in 2002 and has grown into one of Long Island's most respected personal injury, employment law, and insurance litigation firms. The firm's six attorneys — led by founding partner Jason Tenenbaum — bring over 112 combined years of legal experience to every case. The team speaks English, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, and Russian, ensuring that clients from diverse backgrounds can communicate in the language they are most comfortable with during what is often one of the most stressful periods of their lives.
Attorney Tenenbaum earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law and is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York. He has written more than 1,000 appellate briefs, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million in verdicts and settlements for injured individuals and workers throughout Long Island and New York City. His 2,353+ published legal articles on New York case law make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state, and his analysis is relied upon by attorneys, judges, and insurance professionals across all four Appellate Division departments.
The firm operates on a contingency fee basis for personal injury and employment discrimination cases, which means clients pay no attorney fees unless the firm recovers compensation on their behalf. Every consultation is free, confidential, and without obligation. The firm's centrally located Huntington Station office provides convenient access to Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts in Central Islip, and the New York City Civil Court. Whether you need help with a car accident claim, a workplace discrimination complaint, a no-fault insurance denial, a workers' compensation dispute, or any other legal matter, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. is ready to fight for your rights.
Questions About Standing?
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has been writing about standing since 2008, drawing on 24+ years of practice. Get a free, confidential case evaluation.
No fees unless we win · Available 24/7 · Hablamos Español
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.