Standing (favorite statutes)
March 22, 2021 No Comments
US Bank N.A. v Blake-Hovanec, 2021 NY Slip Op 00893 (2d Dept. 2021) “Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendant did not waive the affirmative defense
US Bank N.A. v Blake-Hovanec, 2021 NY Slip Op 00893 (2d Dept. 2021) “Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendant did not waive the affirmative defense
Allstate Ins. Co. v Kapeleris, 2020 NY Slip Op 02645 (2d Dept. 2020) The Defendant, Stacey Kapeleris is one of the nicest people you could meet.
Abruscato v Allstate Prop., 2018 NY Slip Op 07279 (2d Dept. 2018) However, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was
McCormack v Maloney, 2018 NY Slip Op 02385 (3d Dept. 2018) This is a commercial paper case, but I blog about standing because it is an issue
US Bank N.A. v Ballin, 2018 NY Slip Op 01212 (2d Dept 2018) “Thrasher averred, in relevant part, that her affidavit was based upon her review of
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Simmons, 2015 NY Slip Op 01609 (2d Dept. 2015) “Since Justice Arthur Schack continues to ignore this Court’s precedent, as articulated
Bank of Am., N.A. v Paulsen, 2015 NY Slip Op 01597 (2d Dept. 2015) “Here, contrary to the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court, the appellant
American Express Bank FSB v Najieb, 2015 NY Slip Op 01177 (1st Dept. 2015) “The securitization of plaintiff credit card issuer’s receivables did not divest it of
Boris Kleyman Physician, P.C. v IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51810(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “Defendant’s contention that plaintiff did not establish that
B&R Consol., LLC v Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 06287 (2d Dept. 2014) “The defendants’ contention that Zurich is not a proper party
AETNA Health Plans v Hanover Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 33221(U)(Sup. Ct. Bronx Co. 2013) In this case, Defendant provided no-fault services to Plaintiff’s Assignor.
Urban Radiology, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50850(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (1) Law requiring AOB “The Civil Court dismissed the complaint,
W & Z Acupuncture, P.C. v Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 52400(U)(2d Dept. 2012) Insurance carrier sought an EBT of the medical
Citibank, N.A. v Van Brunt Props., LLC, 2012 NY Slip Op 03974 (2d Dept. 2012) In the world of multiple assignments, it is sometimes asked whether
Health & Endurance Med., P.C. v Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51120(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, defendant was
Kruger v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 09456 (3d Dept. 2010) This is why I always plead every affirmative defense in
St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52063(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “As defendant was already in possession,
Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v Thomas, 2010 NY Slip Op 01606 (2d Dept. 2010) Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendant Terence Thomas did not waive
Bedford Park Neurology, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 52634(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) “The claim form at issue
Since proof of standing is generally not an affirmative part of a no-fault claimant’s prima facie case, this case from the First Department might be of
