Renelique v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 50254(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “With respect to defendant’s cross motion, “[t]he proponent of a
Gutierrez v Tri State Consumers Ins. Co., 2015 NY Slip Op 51703(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2015) “Defendant demonstrated that the assignor, who was also the insured under
Want to cancel a policy that insures against proper damage? Material misrepresentation will do it. A policy that of insurance that insures against death or personal
Castlepoint Ins. Co. v Jaipersaud, 2015 NY Slip Op 02839 (1st Dept. 2015) “Thus, we are constrained to find that plaintiff is under no duty to defend
Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Infinity Group, 2014 NY Slip Op 50602(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) The EUO was sufficient to raise an issue of fact as
Universal Health Chiropractic, P.C. v Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50350(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) No preclusion here. “The vehicle involved in the
Doctrinally, a fraudulent procurement defense should not be bound by the 30-day pay or deny rule. This is so since the Appellate Division in Kaplun specifically
Ideal Med. Supply v Mercury Cas. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 23068 (App. Term 1st Dept. 2013) “Although plaintiff’s assignor was a named party in
W.H.O. Acupuncture, P.C. v Infinity Prop. & Cas. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 22142 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) It was interesting to see a discussion
Westchester Med. Ctr. v GMAC Ins. Co. Online, Inc., 2011 NY Slip Op 00217 (2d Dept. 2011) “Moreover, although the defendants contend that they submitted evidence
Total Family Chiropractic v Mercury Cas. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51470(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) This was another one that did not necessarily go my
Alexander Alperovich, M.D., P.C. v Auto One Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 51721(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) They say many times that the devil is
