Rocket Docket – to the moon
New York no-fault arbitration case analysis where late submissions led to rocket docket preclusion despite provider's failure to object, highlighting systemic issues.
Rocket Docket – to the moon — Read More →24 articles published in December 2016
The articles below were published in December 2016 by Attorney Jason Tenenbaum and the legal team at his Long Island law office. Each article provides detailed analysis of real court decisions, statutory developments, and procedural issues in New York personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment law.
Attorney Tenenbaum has maintained this legal blog since 2008, creating one of the most comprehensive public archives of New York insurance and personal injury case law analysis available online. Every article draws on his firsthand experience litigating cases in Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts, New York City Civil Court, and the Appellate Term. Unlike generic legal content, these articles cite specific case holdings, analyze judicial reasoning, and identify practical takeaways for attorneys and claimants navigating New York's complex legal landscape.
Whether you are an attorney researching a procedural question, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your legal rights after an accident or workplace dispute, this archive offers substantive legal analysis grounded in real New York courtroom experience. For case-specific legal advice, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
New York no-fault arbitration case analysis where late submissions led to rocket docket preclusion despite provider's failure to object, highlighting systemic issues.
Rocket Docket – to the moon — Read More →Court upholds intercompany arbitration award where causation defense fails - DTG Operations v Travelers case analysis on injury causation standards.
Causation defense not substantiated in intercompany arbitration — Read More →Attorney Jason Tenenbaum examines why insurance carriers file declaratory judgment actions against Anikeyev medical providers despite prior adverse rulings and collateral estoppel principles.
Why are cariers filing DJ’s against the Anikeyev providers? — Read More →Georgia and New York laws both prohibit retroactive rescission of auto insurance policies despite material misrepresentations in procurement applications.
Georgia Law and New York law on material misrepresentations — Read More →Court sustains verdict for plaintiff in no-fault MRI medical necessity case after finding defendant's expert witness testimony not credible despite qualifications.
Verdict in favor of Plaintiff sustained — Read More →Pennsylvania insurance law case shows that policy rescission may not affect innocent third parties, highlighting complex choice of law issues in no-fault insurance disputes.
Innocent third-party plays out under Pennsylvania law analysis — Read More →Court rejects medical supplier's affidavit claiming claim form was mailed before it was even created, highlighting the importance of accuracy in legal documentation.
Mailing affidavit is wrong — Read More →J.K.M. Med. Care v Ameriprise: Court rules on EUO scheduling requirements, malpractice implications, and assignment timing in New York no-fault insurance case.
Another EUO bonanza — Read More →Ameriprise's appeal backfires as court rules late EUO scheduling letters are nullified, showing how insurers' procedural mistakes can benefit healthcare providers in no-fault claims.
A feckless appeal by Ameriprise — Read More →Court ruling clarifies that the 2014 attorney fee increase for no-fault insurance cases is not retroactive, supporting the $850 statutory maximum for pre-amendment cases.
Attorney fee limitations — Read More →Court of Appeals denies leave in Mallela limitation case, ending a problematic Article 75 petition that should never have reached appellate level.
Mallela limitation case not going to the Court of Appeals — Read More →Court clarifies when someone transitions from vehicle occupant to pedestrian status, impacting no-fault insurance coverage eligibility in New York.
Occupied? Pedestrian? — Read More →Expert opinions based on incorrect medical records are inadmissible and insufficient for summary judgment. Court rejects defense experts who relied on switched notes.
Wrong records? Inadmissible opinion — Read More →New York court rejects IME Watchdog's claims against defense firm for excluding non-attorneys from medical exams, finding no tortious conduct or irreparable harm in no-fault cases.
IME watchdog — Read More →New York courts have discretion to deny adjournments when attorneys lack due diligence. Learn about court adjournment standards and legal requirements.
Adjournments not granted as a matter of course — Read More →Court upholds jury verdict denying serious injury claim despite plaintiff's shoulder surgery and medical testimony in GEICO insurance dispute.
SUM jury verdict sustained — Read More →Court modifies Fatmir rule requiring insurers to provide documentation of underwriting practices to establish material misrepresentation in policy procurement cases.
Material misrepresentation again — Read More →Court ruling on loss transfer arbitration requiring respondent carriers to provide affirmative proof when challenging medical payments in NY no-fault cases.
Another Loss Transfer — Read More →New York's Second Department reaffirms business record authentication standards in foreclosure cases, showing how CPLR 4518 requirements remain crucial for establishing mortgage holder status.
Business record discussion in foreclosures — Read More →Analysis of Golden Earth Chiropractic v Global Liberty case examining master arbitrator powers vs factual review authority in NY no-fault insurance disputes.
Article 75 review dissected — Read More →Court ruling demonstrates that expert testimony on range of motion limitations and orthopedic tests can establish serious injury threshold under NY Insurance Law 5102(d).
5102(d) examined at trial against MVAIC — Read More →Voluntary inter-company arbitration case where insurer exceeded policy limits in award, highlighting importance of rejecting arbitration when limits may be surpassed.
Voluntary inter-company arbitration — Read More →Court clarifies that EUO scheduling letters must be sent within 30 days of claim receipt, reinforcing timing requirements under New York no-fault insurance law.
Timely EUO letters — Read More →New York no-fault insurance case on VTL § 313 cancellation requirements and DMV filing proof issues for policy termination validity.
VTL cancellation issues — Read More →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes legal analysis on a regular basis covering developments in New York personal injury litigation, no-fault insurance disputes, employment discrimination, and related practice areas. Attorney Tenenbaum started writing about New York case law in 2008, and the blog has grown into a library of over 2,353 articles analyzing court decisions from the Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals.
Topics frequently covered include the prima facie case standard in no-fault actions, the 30-day preclusion rule under Insurance Regulation 192, IME and EUO no-show defenses, summary judgment practice under CPLR 3212, default judgment standards, verification and claims submission procedures, and the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law Section 5102(d). Employment law articles address wrongful termination, workplace discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, wage and hour violations, and employer retaliation claims.
Each article is written for a professional audience but remains accessible to non-lawyers seeking to understand how New York courts handle specific legal issues. The firm serves clients across Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. If you have a legal question about any topic covered in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential consultation.
New York's civil court system is one of the most complex in the nation, with multiple overlapping jurisdictions that affect how personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment cases are litigated. The New York City Civil Court handles claims up to $25,000 in the five boroughs, while the District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk Counties handle similar matters on Long Island. For claims exceeding $25,000, the Supreme Court serves as the primary trial court with unlimited monetary jurisdiction. Despite its name, the Supreme Court is not the highest court in New York — that distinction belongs to the Court of Appeals, which sits in Albany and decides approximately 200 cases per year.
Appeals from Civil Court and District Court decisions go to the Appellate Term, which is divided into departments corresponding to the Appellate Division. The Appellate Term for the Second Department — which covers Nassau County, Suffolk County, Kings County (Brooklyn), Queens County, and Richmond County (Staten Island) — hears hundreds of no-fault insurance appeals each year and has developed a substantial body of case law on topics including timely denial, verification procedures, proof of mailing, fee schedule disputes, and medical necessity standards. The Appellate Division, Second Department, hears appeals from Supreme Court and from the Appellate Term, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts within its jurisdiction.
Understanding where your case falls within this system is critical. A no-fault insurance dispute involving a $3,000 medical bill will follow a very different procedural path than a $500,000 personal injury claim arising from the same automobile accident. The former is typically resolved through mandatory arbitration before the American Arbitration Association under Insurance Department Regulation 68, while the latter proceeds through Supreme Court with full discovery, independent medical examinations under CPLR 3121, depositions, and potentially a jury trial. Attorney Tenenbaum has practiced extensively in all of these venues and understands the strategic considerations unique to each.
Several statutes and regulations appear frequently in the articles archived on this page. Insurance Law Article 51 establishes New York's no-fault insurance framework, requiring every motor vehicle policy to include personal injury protection benefits covering medical expenses, lost earnings (up to $2,000 per month), and other basic economic loss up to $50,000 per person. 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 (Insurance Regulation 192) imposes a 30-day deadline on insurers to pay or deny no-fault claims after receiving proof of claim and all demanded verification, and the failure to timely deny results in preclusion of most coverage defenses.
In personal injury litigation, Insurance Law Section 5102(d) defines the categories of "serious injury" that a plaintiff must establish before recovering non-economic damages in a motor vehicle accident case. The nine categories — death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, fracture, loss of a fetus, permanent loss of use, permanent consequential limitation, significant limitation of use, and the 90/180-day category — each have specific evidentiary requirements that have been refined through decades of appellate decisions. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has litigated serious injury threshold motions in hundreds of cases and regularly writes about new developments in this area.
Employment claims in New York implicate both state and federal statutes. The New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law Section 296) prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, and domestic violence victim status. The New York City Human Rights Law provides even broader protections and applies a more liberal standard. At the federal level, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act provide additional protections but are subject to administrative exhaustion requirements through the EEOC.
Workers' compensation cases in New York are governed by the Workers' Compensation Law and administered by the Workers' Compensation Board. Injured workers are entitled to medical treatment, lost wage benefits (typically two-thirds of the average weekly wage, subject to a statutory maximum), and permanency awards for lasting disabilities. Third-party claims — such as personal injury lawsuits against property owners or general contractors under Labor Law Sections 200, 240, and 241 — often run parallel to workers' compensation proceedings and involve complex lien and subrogation issues that require experienced legal counsel to navigate properly.
The articles in this archive analyze real decisions from courts across New York State, with a particular focus on the Appellate Term and Appellate Division decisions that establish binding precedent for trial courts on Long Island and in New York City. Whether you are an attorney preparing a motion, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your rights, these articles provide the detailed legal analysis that generic legal websites simply cannot offer. For personalized advice about your specific situation, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. serves clients from its office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. The firm represents individuals and businesses throughout Long Island — including the towns of Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton, Huntington, and Oyster Bay in Suffolk County, and the cities and villages of Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa, and Levittown in Nassau County. The firm also handles cases in all five boroughs of New York City: Queens, Brooklyn (Kings County), Manhattan (New York County), the Bronx, and Staten Island (Richmond County). Court appearances are regularly made at Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, the Suffolk County District Court, and the New York City Civil Court throughout the five boroughs.
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.