Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50772(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012)
“On appeal, plaintiff contends that these branches of defendant’s motion should have been denied because defendant never proved that the applicable automobile insurance policy contained a provision entitling defendant to EUOs. This argument lacks merit”
At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, our attorneys have the integrity and experience you need to best assist, advise, and support you through your legal challenge, every step of the way.
Using cutting-edge technology and strategy to solve complicated problems.
We can fight for your pain and suffering, lost income, medical bills, and any future lost wages.
You have the right to bring a malpractice claim for your medical expenses, lost income and pain and suffering.
If you have been sued for an unpaid consumer loan, fallen behind on your credit card bills or similar.
We can help when you are faced with commercial litigation issues.
We work hard to fight for your individual case and rights, while providing superior legal services on a timely, effective, and efficient basis.
Proin rhoncus metus aliquet blandit ad placerat sociosqu erat vel letius scelerisque taciti pulvinar.
Proin rhoncus metus aliquet blandit ad placerat sociosqu erat vel letius scelerisque taciti pulvinar.
One Response
How many times does the Court have to say the same thing. I cannot believe that plaintiff’s continue to make the argument that the policy must be included for any accidents that occur after April 5, of 2003. Here’s some free advice to the plaintiff’s bar: ITS TIME TO UPDATE YOUR MOTION PAPERS AND MAYBE DO A A LITTLE RESEARCH