Skip to main content
Late Notice of Trial and standard of law as to Malella
Discovery

Late Notice of Trial and standard of law as to Malella

By Jason Tenenbaum 2 min read

Key Takeaway

Court ruling on late notice of trial motions and Malella defense standards in NY no-fault insurance cases, including timing rules and professional corporation compliance.

This article is part of our ongoing discovery coverage, with 102 published articles analyzing discovery issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

Q-B Jewish Med. Rehabilitation, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51551(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011)

  1. the 20-day time period to make a motion to strike is not absolute.

2)”detailed and specific reasons for believing that plaintiff is a professional service corporation which fails to comply with applicable state or local licensing laws”

  1. Why do Dr. McGee facilities seem to have these Malella issues?

Free Consultation · No Fee Unless We Win

Does this apply to your situation?

Every case is different. Get a free, confidential case review from an experienced attorney who can tell you exactly where you stand.

Trivia – I subpoenaed Dr. McGee quite a few years ago to come to a trial on an EMG/NCV test he performed.  He actually showed up.  I am not sure what his view on complying with subpoenas is nowadays.

“While defendant’s motion to strike the action from the trial calendar was untimely, under all of the circumstances presented, including the de minimis nature of the delay in moving to strike the action from the trial calendar, contrary to plaintiff’s contention, it cannot be said that the Civil Court’s determination to consider the motion rather than deny it as untimely was an improvident exercise of discretion (see CPLR 2004; Uniform Rules of the New York City Civil Court § 208.17 ). Defendant set forth detailed and specific reasons for believing that plaintiff is a professional service corporation which fails to comply with applicable state or local licensing laws and, thus, ineligible to recover no-fault benefits (see State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Mallela, 4 NY3d 313 ), a defense which is not precluded.”


Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2011 post, CPLR 2004 provisions regarding court discretion and excuse of procedural defaults may have been amended, and Uniform Rules governing Civil Court motion practice and trial calendar procedures have likely been updated. Additionally, case law interpreting the Mallela standard for professional service corporation licensing compliance and no-fault eligibility may have evolved. Practitioners should verify current provisions of CPLR 2004 and applicable Uniform Rules, as well as recent appellate decisions addressing Mallela challenges and late motion practice.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

About This Topic

Discovery Practice in New York Courts

Discovery is the pre-trial process through which parties exchange information relevant to the dispute. In New York, discovery practice is governed by CPLR Article 31 and involves depositions, interrogatories, document demands, and physical examinations. Disputes over the scope of discovery, compliance with demands, and sanctions for noncompliance are frequent in both no-fault and personal injury cases. These articles analyze discovery rules, court decisions on discovery disputes, and strategies for effective discovery practice.

102 published articles in Discovery

Keep Reading

More Discovery Analysis

View all Discovery articles

Was this article helpful?

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a discovery matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

Reviewed & Verified By

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (4)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

KL
Kurt LunDGREN
Why do McGee facilities seem to have these Malella issues? I represent Dr. McGee. His facilities are a cash cow for the defense firms. For every dollar paid to his facilities, God and a few other people only know how much is paid to defense firms. He is one of the only providers that stand up to the likes of State Farm. He sued State Farm and Allstate. The problem is that he is too successful. He has too many patients. Thus, he has to be taken down. It doesnt matter that HE sees the patients, He controls the medicine, He controls the practice, and He appears for EBTS, EUOs etc, and turns over most every document the carriers require ….. but he is Malella because the carriers say so. Yet, I believe, the facts say something different. As you indicated JT, he is willing to back up his practice and will appear in Court. He is not always easy to work for but who is? He is perhaps my most demanding client. He may piss off carriers because he fights back and doesnt cower on the mention of Malella. And I fight for him because I believe in him. So the answer to your question as to why certain insurers have so many Malella issues with him – its because they can. They can delay payment by requiring EUOs again and again, no matter how many times he appears and no matter how much documentation he provides. They can harass because the Insurance Department and the Courts allow it. The QB Jewish Case is not mine. If I have any, I have but a few QB Jewish cases. But I am quite confident that he will apppear for deposition in that matter (although he possibly has appeared for Allstate many time in the past for EUO and EBT) and answer the same questions, and provide the same discovery, to the same defense firms, again. Why does he have so many Malella issues? Because the insurance companies have created the issues. Because they do not want to pay. Because they do not like the fact that he fights back. its easy to allege Malella. Proving it is a different matter. As far as I am concerned, bring it on. Nuff said.
J
JT Author
Kurt, Who hasn’t represented John J. McGee? I know he fights back, and the word on the street is he ends up getting paid big money at the end of the day because nobody can substantiate the Malella defense that is often alleged against him. Perhaps it begs the questions why certain carriers waste the time and resources fighting him on Malella grounds? He must be doing something right, because I served him years ago in a very nice house in Huntington. His wife was a very charming lady if my memory serves me correct.
KL
Kurt LunDGREN
Thanks Jt for responding. Yes, I am not the only one representing McGee, although sometimes I feel like that. Its frustrating JT on many fronts. But he wears the white shirt with his name on it everyday at his offices, sees the patients, battles with us attorneys who are not fighting hard enough, is always available and responsive to any request of mine, and he, and no one else, controls his medicine and finances. Why do certain carriers waste time and resource fighting him on Malella ground – because the Courts let them. And he is a cash cow to certain defense firms. They would rather pay defense counsel than pay his claims. This is of course good for defense counsel. So as I said, bring it on. McGee will not roll over and he will defend his practice. Personally, I would prefer to defend on medical necessity, but who wouldnt! Those are the cards that us McGee attorneys are dealt.
J
JT Author
My goal is to do what is in the best interest of my clients. Many times, that involves cutting my fees, doing things for free or telling my clients to pay a provider instead of paying me and then (1) the provider and (2) their attorney. It is frustrating when I see this greedy behavior on the defense side. I see it enough on the Plaintiff side. And Kurt, I have my own feelings about McGee that I will share with you offline when I see you in court.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Review Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Free Consultation Free Case Review