Key Takeaway
Learn how errata sheet corrections impact credibility determinations and summary judgment motions in NY litigation. Expert analysis from Long Island attorney Jason Tenenbaum.
This article is part of our ongoing discovery coverage, with 97 published articles analyzing discovery issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Understanding Errata Sheets and Deposition Practice in New York
When it comes to litigation in New York, the deposition process serves as one of the most critical components of case preparation and discovery. The ability to clarify, correct, or modify testimony through errata sheets can significantly impact the outcome of summary judgment motions and trial proceedings. For attorneys practicing in Long Island, New York City, and throughout the greater metropolitan area, understanding the nuances of errata sheet law is essential for effective representation.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has been serving clients across Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx for years, helping address the complex terrain of New York civil litigation. Our experience with deposition practice and summary judgment motions has shown us that even seemingly minor procedural issues, like errata sheet corrections, can have profound implications for case outcomes.
Understanding Errata Sheets in New York Practice
What Are Errata Sheets?
Errata sheets, also known as correction sheets, are documents that allow deponents to review their deposition transcripts and make necessary corrections to their testimony. Under New York law, deponents have the right to review their testimony and submit changes within a specified timeframe, typically 30 days after the transcript becomes available.
The process serves several important functions:
- Accuracy: Ensuring that the written record accurately reflects the deponent intended testimony
- Clarification: Providing opportunities to clarify ambiguous statements or correct misunderstood questions
- Due Process: Protecting deponents rights to accurate representation of their statements
The Legal Framework in New York
New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) govern deposition practice throughout the state. Whether you are dealing with personal injury cases in Nassau County, commercial litigation in Manhattan, or family court matters in Suffolk County, the same fundamental principles apply to errata sheet corrections and their impact on summary judgment motions.
Case Analysis: Yefet v Shalmoni – A Pivotal Decision
Yefet v Shalmoni, 2011 NY Slip Op 00677 (2d Dept. 2011)
I havent seen this one in awhile and it is noteworthy because the law seems to presume that testimony contradicting a deposition transcript is insufficient to rebut the deficiencies found in the EBT transcript.
“the conflict between the original transcript of the plaintiffs deposition testimony and the correction she submitted in the errata sheet raised an issue of credibility which could not be resolved on the motion for summary judgment.”
The Broader Implications for Long Island and NYC Practitioners
The Second Departments decision in Yefet v Shalmoni represents a significant development in New York deposition practice that resonates throughout the legal community from Manhattans financial district to Long Islands suburban communities. The courts ruling establishes crucial precedent regarding the interplay between original deposition testimony and subsequent errata sheet corrections.
Impact on Summary Judgment Strategy
For attorneys practicing throughout the New York metropolitan area, this decision fundamentally changes summary judgment strategy in several ways:
- Plaintiffs Perspective: Personal injury attorneys representing clients in car accidents, slip and falls, and other tort claims can now more effectively use errata sheets to preserve their cases against dismissal.
- Defense Strategy: Defense counsel must now be more careful about relying solely on deposition contradictions to secure summary judgment, particularly when errata sheets create factual disputes.
- Case Evaluation: Both sides must now consider the potential impact of errata sheet corrections when evaluating case strength and settlement value.
Regional Court Applications in the New York Metropolitan Area
Nassau County Practice
Known for its efficiency in commercial and personal injury litigation, Nassau County courts have generally embraced the Yefet standard, with many judges preferring to let juries resolve credibility issues.
Suffolk County Applications
With its mix of suburban and rural cases, Suffolk County courts often see errata sheet issues in complex personal injury and commercial matters where thorough depositions are crucial.
New York County (Manhattan) Considerations
The sophisticated commercial docket in Manhattan frequently encounters errata sheet disputes in high-stakes business litigation where precision in testimony is paramount.
Kings County (Brooklyn) Practice
Brooklyns diverse caseload, from personal injury to complex commercial matters, provides numerous opportunities for the Yefet principle to apply.
Frequently Asked Questions About Errata Sheets
How long do I have to submit an errata sheet after my deposition?
Under New York law, you typically have 30 days from when the transcript becomes available. However, specific timeframes can vary based on court rules and agreements between parties.
Can I make any changes I want on an errata sheet?
While you can correct errors and clarify statements, wholesale changes that completely contradict your original testimony may be viewed skeptically by courts. The changes should be reasonable and aimed at accuracy rather than strategic advantage.
Will submitting an errata sheet hurt my case?
Not necessarily. As Yefet v Shalmoni demonstrates, courts recognize that errata sheets serve important accuracy and fairness functions. Reasonable corrections that clarify your testimony are generally accepted.
What happens if the other side objects to my errata sheet corrections?
Objections to errata sheet corrections typically create factual disputes that must be resolved by a jury rather than decided on summary judgment. This often means your case will survive to trial.
Should I always submit an errata sheet?
You should review your transcript carefully with your attorney. If there are errors, misstatements, or unclear responses, an errata sheet can be an important tool for protecting your interests.
Contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum
The Yefet v Shalmoni decision represents an important development in New York deposition practice that affects litigation throughout the metropolitan area. Whether you are dealing with a personal injury claim in Nassau County, a commercial dispute in Manhattan, or any other legal matter requiring deposition testimony, understanding how errata sheets can impact your case is crucial.
At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, we have helped countless clients address the complexities of New York litigation, from initial case evaluation through trial and appeal. Our experience with deposition practice and summary judgment motions allows us to provide strategic advice tailored to your specific situation.
If you have questions about deposition testimony, errata sheets, or any other aspect of New York litigation, do not hesitate to contact us. We serve clients throughout Long Island, New York City, and the surrounding areas, and we are here to help protect your legal interests.
Call us today at 516-750-0595 for a consultation about your case.
Our team is ready to review your situation, explain your options, and provide the skilled representation you need to achieve the best possible outcome. Do not let procedural complexities or deposition challenges put your case at risk – contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum and let our experience work for you.
Related Articles
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.
About This Topic
Discovery Practice in New York Courts
Discovery is the pre-trial process through which parties exchange information relevant to the dispute. In New York, discovery practice is governed by CPLR Article 31 and involves depositions, interrogatories, document demands, and physical examinations. Disputes over the scope of discovery, compliance with demands, and sanctions for noncompliance are frequent in both no-fault and personal injury cases. These articles analyze discovery rules, court decisions on discovery disputes, and strategies for effective discovery practice.
97 published articles in Discovery
Keep Reading
More Discovery Analysis
Another Discovery
Appellate Term ruling on discovery objections shows courts won't disturb trial court discretion when defendants fail to timely object within CPLR's 20-day period.
May 22, 2021
Deposition rulings
New York appellate court clarifies that deposition rulings cannot be appealed as of right, even when made through formal motion practice rather than during examination.
Sep 25, 2020
Discovery – what is material and necessary
Court ruling on physician-patient privilege waiver in personal injury discovery - what medical records are material and necessary when claiming lost earnings.
Nov 27, 2018
This one makes no sense.
Court decision highlights discovery compliance requirements when amended complaints introduce new facts, even if discovery demands appear identical to previous requests.
Jul 21, 2015
Medical provider cannot defeat IME non-cooperation defense through stating “discovery is outstanding”
Medical providers cannot defeat IME non-cooperation defense by claiming outstanding discovery. NY appellate court rules on summary judgment standards.
Sep 2, 2013
EBT in aid of arbitration? No dice.
NY court denies EBT in aid of arbitration, ruling disclosure must be "absolutely necessary" not merely convenient for no-fault insurance disputes.
May 7, 2010Was this article helpful?
About the Author
Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a discovery matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
