By Jason Tenenbaum, Esq. · 24+ Years · NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI Bar Admissions
The New York Wrongful Death
Modernization Act
New York is the only state in the country that limits wrongful death damages to strict economic loss. The Grieving Families Act would change that — twice passed, twice vetoed, reintroduced in 2026. Practitioner-level analysis of EPTL §5-4.3 reform and what it means for Long Island and NYC families.
Why New York Is an Outlier
The Most Restrictive Wrongful Death Damages
Statute in the United States
1847
EPTL §5-4.3 Origin
New York's wrongful death statute predates the Civil War. The "pecuniary loss only" framework has not been substantively expanded in 178 years.
50
States Allowing Non-Economic Recovery
Every state except New York permits at least some recovery for emotional damages, loss of companionship, or non-pecuniary loss in wrongful death actions.
2x
Hochul Vetoes (2022, 2023)
The Grieving Families Act has passed both chambers twice. Vetoes cited insurance-premium concerns. 2026 reintroduction is in committee.
The current framework means a NY family whose loved one had no documented income — a stay-at-home parent, an elderly grandparent, a child — often recovers nothing under §5-4.3 beyond funeral and medical expenses, even when liability is clear and the loss is profound.
What Current Law (EPTL §5-4.3) Actually Allows
EPTL §5-4.3(a) reads: "such sum as the jury... deems to be fair and just compensation for the pecuniary injuries resulting from the decedent's death to the persons for whose benefit the action is brought." The word "pecuniary" — meaning economic — is the constraint that makes New York the national outlier.
Practitioner gloss on what is recoverable under the current §5-4.3:
Recoverable Under Current Law
- Lost earnings. Decedent's pre-death income × work-life expectancy, reduced to present value.
- Lost services and household contributions. Quantified value of housekeeping, childcare, household management.
- Lost parental guidance. Limited recovery for minor children's loss of nurture, training, and education (the narrow exception to the strict pecuniary rule).
- Funeral expenses. Reasonable and customary funeral and burial costs.
- Medical bills. Medical expenses incurred between injury and death.
- Survival action damages (EPTL §11-3.3). Decedent's own conscious pain and suffering BEFORE death — separately recoverable in the same suit.
BARRED Under Current Law
- Grief and emotional anguish of surviving spouse, parents, or children.
- Loss of consortium beyond the limited parental guidance exception.
- Loss of companionship, society, comfort.
- Loss of love and affection.
- Recovery for siblings — barred even where the sibling was financially dependent on the decedent.
- Recovery for life partners in non-marital relationships — barred regardless of duration or financial entanglement.
The most under-used existing remedy. The EPTL §11-3.3 survival action — for the decedent's own conscious pain and suffering before death — is recoverable under current law in the same lawsuit as the §5-4.3 wrongful death claim. It is frequently overlooked by practitioners not regularly handling wrongful death cases. If your loved one was conscious between injury and death (even for minutes), the survival action can produce significant recovery independent of the §5-4.3 limitations.
Interactive Tool
Compare Your Recovery:
Current Law vs Proposed Act
Illustrative comparison of recoverable damages under current EPTL §5-4.3 vs the proposed Modernization Act. Estimates only — actual recovery depends on case-specific facts.
Current Law (EPTL §5-4.3)
Pecuniary loss only.
$1,720,000
Proposed (Modernization Act)
Adds emotional damages + expanded beneficiaries.
$2,720,000
Illustrative estimates only. Lost earnings use a 3% discount rate assumption; emotional damage estimates use median jury verdict ranges from comparable states (FL, CA, TX). Actual recovery depends on liability, comparative-fault apportionment, policy limits, and case-specific facts. Not legal advice. Call for a free case-specific analysis.
The Long Road of NY Wrongful Death Reform
EPTL §5-4.3 enacted
New York's first wrongful death statute. "Pecuniary loss only" framework has remained substantively unchanged since.
First Grieving Families Act passes both chambers
Passed Senate and Assembly. Vetoed by Governor Hochul citing insurance-premium concerns for hospitals, municipalities, school districts.
Revised version passes again, vetoed again
2023 iteration narrowed the beneficiary class and addressed some retroactivity concerns. Hochul vetoed again, citing remaining insurance-cost projections.
Third iteration in committee
Reintroduced as part of the 2026 legislative push. Drafters report phased-in effective dates for institutional defendants and tightened retroactivity provisions to address prior veto concerns. Status as of May 15, 2026: in committee.
What Other States Allow That New York Doesn't
New York
EPTL §5-4.3
Pecuniary loss ONLY. No grief, no companionship, no loss of love.
Outlier — only state with this restriction.
Florida
Wrongful Death Act §768.21
Mental pain and suffering, loss of companionship, net accumulations of decedent's estate.
Broad recovery for emotional damages.
California
Code Civ. Proc. §377.60
Loss of love, companionship, affection, society, comfort, care, plus economic damages.
Broadest non-economic recovery.
New Jersey
NJSA §2A:31-5
Pecuniary loss only by statute, but courts construe "pecuniary" broadly to include services, guidance, and care.
Middle ground — narrower than CA/FL but broader than NY.
The proposed NY Modernization Act would move New York closer to the Florida / California model — adding emotional damages, loss of companionship, and an expanded beneficiary class. It would not adopt the broadest California formulation outright; the 2026 iteration is reportedly closer to Florida's framework with phased-in effective dates for institutional defendants.
Tips From the Author
What I Tell Families
Right Now About the Pending Reform
— Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
I handle wrongful death cases for families every year. The conversation when a family loses a non-earning loved one — a retired grandparent, a stay-at-home parent, a young child — is the hardest conversation I have. Under the current EPTL §5-4.3 framework, the legal recovery for those losses is often dramatically smaller than the actual loss the family is experiencing. The Modernization Act would change that.
What I tell families right now: the Modernization Act has been proposed three times in five years. Each iteration has gotten closer to passage. The 2026 iteration has the most carefully drafted retroactivity language of any version so far, which addresses one of the principal Hochul veto concerns. That said, "closer to passage" is not the same thing as "will pass."
Two practical implications for pending or imminent cases:
- 1. File now under the existing framework, but document everything else. The 2-year SOL under EPTL §5-4.1 is absolute. File the wrongful death and survival action complaints under current law. But contemporaneously document the relational impact — diaries, letters from grief counselors, the family's ongoing daily experience — so that if the Act passes with partial retroactivity OR a transition provision allows amended pleadings, the evidence base is ready.
- 2. Plead the survival action under EPTL §11-3.3 in parallel. Conscious pain and suffering before death is recoverable today and is the most-overlooked damages theory in NY wrongful death practice. If your loved one was conscious for any meaningful period between injury and death, the survival action can dramatically increase total recovery independent of any reform.
Frequently Asked Questions
Wrongful Death Reform & Family Questions
What is the New York Wrongful Death Modernization Act?
The Grieving Families Act — informally the New York Wrongful Death Modernization Act — is a proposed amendment to EPTL §5-4.3 that would expand New York's narrow wrongful death damages scheme. Current NY law allows recovery only for the decedent's economic loss (lost earnings, funeral expenses, medical bills). The proposed amendment would add (1) recovery for emotional damages (grief, anguish, loss of companionship), (2) an expanded class of eligible beneficiaries beyond traditional next-of-kin, and (3) an extended statute of limitations. Versions have been passed by both chambers and vetoed by Governor Hochul in 2022 and 2023. A 2026 reintroduction is in committee as of May 15, 2026.
Why is New York's current wrongful death law called the most restrictive in the country?
EPTL §5-4.3 dates to 1847 and has not been substantively expanded since. New York is the only state that limits wrongful death damages strictly to pecuniary (economic) loss — no recovery for emotional anguish, loss of companionship, loss of guidance, or loss of love. Every other state allows at least some non-economic recovery. The practical effect: a NY family whose loved one had no documented income (a stay-at-home parent, an elderly retired grandparent, a child) often recovers nothing under §5-4.3 beyond funeral and medical expenses, even when liability is clear and the loss is profound.
How would the proposed reforms change my recovery in a specific case?
Three categories of change. First, emotional damages: spouses, parents, and adult children would be able to recover for grief, anguish, and loss of companionship — categories now barred entirely. Second, expanded beneficiaries: under §5-4.3 as it currently reads, only the next-of-kin defined in EPTL §4-1.1 can recover; the proposed amendment extends to additional close relations including siblings and life partners with documented dependence. Third, extended SOL: the proposed amendment would extend the wrongful-death statute of limitations from 2 years to 3.5 years, aligning with the general personal-injury SOL under CPLR §214.
Has the Wrongful Death Modernization Act passed yet?
Not as of May 15, 2026. Versions of the bill have passed the Senate and Assembly in 2022 and 2023; both versions were vetoed by Governor Hochul. The 2026 iteration is part of a renewed legislative push, supported by the New York State Trial Lawyers Association, organized labor, and several victims'-rights coalitions. The Governor's veto memos cited concerns about insurance-premium impact, particularly on hospitals, school districts, and municipalities — concerns that the 2026 bill drafters have attempted to address through revised effective-date and beneficiary-class provisions.
Why has the Wrongful Death Modernization Act been vetoed twice?
Governor Hochul's 2022 and 2023 veto memos articulated three principal concerns: (1) the projected impact on liability-insurance premiums for hospitals, school districts, and municipalities — defendants whose premiums are ultimately borne by taxpayers; (2) the open-ended exposure created by an expanded class of beneficiaries before judicial gloss could establish predictable boundaries; (3) the retroactivity question — earlier versions were unclear about whether the new damages would apply to causes of action that had already accrued. Each successive iteration has tightened these provisions; the 2026 version reportedly limits retroactive application and includes phased-in effective dates for institutional defendants.
What is EPTL §5-4.3 and what does it actually say?
EPTL §5-4.3(a) provides that damages recoverable in a wrongful-death action are 'such sum as the jury or, where issues of fact are tried without a jury, the court or the referee deems to be fair and just compensation for the pecuniary injuries resulting from the decedent's death to the persons for whose benefit the action is brought.' The keyword is 'pecuniary' — meaning economic. Subsections then specify funeral expenses, conscious pain and suffering of the decedent before death (recoverable through EPTL §11-3.3 survival action), and interest from the date of death. The proposed Modernization Act would amend subsection (a) to include non-pecuniary damages and expand the beneficiary class.
How do New York wrongful death damages compare to other states?
Florida (Wrongful Death Act §768.21): recovery for emotional anguish, loss of companionship, and the entire net accumulations of decedent's estate. New Jersey (NJSA §2A:31-5): recovery for pecuniary loss only — but New Jersey courts construe 'pecuniary' more broadly than New York does, allowing recovery for loss of services, guidance, and care. California (Code Civ. Proc. §377.60): broad recovery for loss of love, companionship, affection, society, comfort, and care. Texas (Wrongful Death Act §71.004): recovery for mental anguish, loss of companionship, loss of inheritance. New York is alone in limiting recovery to strict economic loss.
If the Act passes, will it apply to pending cases?
Almost certainly not retroactively in the way most plaintiffs would want. NY constitutional doctrine generally disfavors retroactive application of statutes that impose new damages liabilities on defendants whose conduct predated the statute. The 2026 bill drafters have addressed this directly: under the current iteration, claims accruing before the effective date stay under EPTL §5-4.3 as it currently reads; claims accruing after take the expanded framework. This means timing-of-death matters significantly. Families whose decedents passed before the effective date will not benefit from the expanded damages; those whose decedents pass after will.
What should families of recent wrongful-death decedents do?
Three things. First, do not delay filing — the existing 2-year SOL under EPTL §5-4.1 is absolute and does not depend on the reform's passage. Second, document the relational impact even though it is not yet recoverable; if the Act passes with a partial-retroactivity provision, contemporaneous documentation will be the evidence base for amended pleadings. Third, plead the survival action under EPTL §11-3.3 in parallel with the wrongful death claim — survival actions allow recovery for the decedent's own conscious pain and suffering before death, which IS recoverable under current law and is the most-overlooked damages theory in NY wrongful-death practice.
Where can I read the current bill text and track its progress?
Bill numbers for the Grieving Families Act / Wrongful Death Modernization Act change each legislative session. The current iteration is in committee; companion bills in the Senate and Assembly can be tracked at nyassembly.gov and the New York Senate site. We update bill-number references in the status section above as the legislation moves through the Judiciary, Codes, or Rules committees. For a free, case-specific assessment of how the existing or proposed framework would apply to your family's situation, call (516) 750-0595.
Continue Reading
Practice Page
Long Island Wrongful Death Attorney
Settlement ranges, case results, Nassau / Suffolk venue insight, and the full wrongful-death practice under current law.
Archive
Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations
EPTL §5-4.1 deadlines, 90-day notice-of-claim requirements for government defendants, and case-specific tolling doctrines.
Archive
NY Wrongful Death Car Accident Settlement
Settlement-range analysis for the most common wrongful-death scenario, with current-law multipliers and case-result examples.
Tort Reform
Hochul Tort Reform 2026
The other half of the 2026 reform package — the proposed 50% comparative-negligence bar and joint-and-several liability changes.
Cluster Cornerstone
50% Comparative Bar Status
Live tracker on the proposed CPLR §1411 amendment and how it interacts with wrongful death claims.
Practice Hub
Long Island Personal Injury
The full PI practice — wrongful death is one of several catastrophic-injury categories we handle for Long Island and NYC families.
If You Have Lost a Loved One
Two Statutes Run in Parallel.
Both Should Be Pled.
The wrongful-death claim under EPTL §5-4.3 and the survival action under EPTL §11-3.3 are separate causes of action. Both are time-sensitive. We will tell you what is recoverable today and what may become recoverable if the Modernization Act passes — with no obligation.
No fee unless we win. Available 24/7. Hablamos Español.