NY CPLR 2004: Lessons in Legal Precision and Court Procedures
Continuing down the theme of rehashing old blog posts I am taking another look at Calderone v. Molloy Collage, CPLR 2004 and what this means for
Continuing down the theme of rehashing old blog posts I am taking another look at Calderone v. Molloy Collage, CPLR 2004 and what this means for
Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 2018 NY Slip Op 03093 (2018) 4-3 holding. For self insured entities, the statute of limitations is 3
Contact Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Girtha Butler v N. Y. City Tr. Auth., 2017 NY Slip Op 88572 (2017) Apparently, an entity that has NO stake
Contact Chiropractic, P.C., as assignee of Butler v New York City Transit Authority, 2016 NY Slip Op 73043(U)(2d Dept. 2016) SOL on self-insured’s going up to the
Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 2016 NY Slip Op 00325 (2d Dept. 2016) “The Appellate Term correctly determined that an action by an
Dyckman Med. Diagnostic/Treatment, P.C. v Granite State Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51026(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) (1) “A defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing a complaint
Contact Chiropractic, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 2013 NY Slip Op 23410 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2013)http://nofault.lisquared.com/wp-admin/post-new.php “Defendant contended therein that, since it does
Wexford Med., P.C. v Commerce Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51193(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The complaint alleges that “health services” were rendered to the
EBM Med. Health Care, P.C. v Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 51720(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011). How do you lose a statute of
Flatlands Acupuncture, P.C. v Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 21133 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) This case is so fraught with procedural errors
M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 2011 NY Slip Op 01525 (1st Dept. 2011) It is well settled that “the No-Fault Law
New Millenium Med. Supply v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51820(U)(2d Dept. 2010) “no-fault [action]…pursuant to a policy of insurance was not interposed
Last v Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2010 NY Slip Op 03416 (2d Dept. 2010) “[t]he plaintiff, whose causes of action were asserted in a
Chester Med. Diagnostic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 52598(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) “On November 21, 2006, plaintiff, a
Spring World Acupuncture, P.C. v NYC Tr. Auth. 2009 NY Slip Op 29229 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2009) Finally, someone convinced the Appellate Term that no-fault