Hearsay insufficient to substantiate a fraud defense/Fee Schedule discussion
Acupuncture Healthcare Plaza I, P.C. v 21st Century Advantage Ins. Co.,2017 NY Slip Op 50945(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) Fee Schedule: Box #18 (1) “Contrary to
Acupuncture Healthcare Plaza I, P.C. v 21st Century Advantage Ins. Co.,2017 NY Slip Op 50945(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) Fee Schedule: Box #18 (1) “Contrary to
Auto One Ins. Co. v Hillside Chiropractic, P.C., 2015 NY Slip Op 01750 (1st Dept. 2015)(1st Dept 2015) “We find that the no-fault arbitrator’s decision to adhere,
People v Laracuente, 21 AD3d 1389 (4th Dept. 2005) “We reject the further contention of defendant that the court abused its discretion in limiting his cross-examination
Quality Health Prods., Inc. v Travelers Indem. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51231(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) “At the trial, the judicial hearing officer refused to allow
Donoso v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 2014 NY Slip Op 04071 (1st Dept 2014) Plaintiff claims that she suffered permanent consequential and significant limitations of
Promed Durable Equip., Inc. As Assignee of Shavonne Flinch v Geico Ins., 2014 NY Slip Op 72449(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) You can read this. From the
Ward v Lincoln Elec. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 02668 (1st Dept. 2014) I think this might be a way around the Appellate Term peer hearsay paradigm
Alev Med. Supply, Inc. v Government Employees Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 50130(U) “Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, the Civil Court properly overruled plaintiff’s hearsay objection to
Kew Garden Imaging v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 50748(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “The Civil Court precluded defendant’s medical witnesses
Alev Med. Supply, Inc. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50568(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “A review of the information on the New
Park Slope Med. & Surgical Supply, Inc. v Metlife Auto & Home, 2012 NY Slip Op 22064 (Civ. Ct. Queens Co. 2012) “In any event, where
Medical Assoc., P.C. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50392(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012). I wrote the reply that got this case dismissed on
When will certain Plaintiffs and their law firms realize that it is okay to occasionally lose in Civil Court. Look at the the mess that Plaintiff
Seaberg v North Shore Lincoln- Mercury, Inc., 2011 NY Slip Op 05688 (2d Dept, 2011). An interesting evidentiary discussion, in a civil matter, with plenty of
Matter of State of New York v Mark S., 2011 NY Slip Op 04792 (3d Dept. 2011) An astute commentator could probably write an article correlating
Consolidated Imaging P.C. (Rafailova) v Travelers Indem. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50159(U)(Civ Ct. Richmond Co. 2011) I did not miss this case. I just avoid
Matter of State of New York v Motzer, 2010 NY Slip Op 09688 (4th Dept. 2010) “Respondent contends that the court erred in allowing petitioner’s expert
Elmont Open Mri & Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 52222(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) I guess
Smolinski v Smolinski, 2010 NY Slip Op 08468 (4th Dept. 2010) I admit that I failed to pick up this case on my own. A nice
Matter of State of New York v Wilkes, 2010 NY Slip Op 07006 (4th Dept. 2010) “Insofar as respondent preserved for our review his further contention