Damages – expert witness not necessary
May 12, 2020 No Comments
Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 02687 (3d Dept. 2020) “Turning to the issue of damages, we reject Yugo’s contention that
Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 02687 (3d Dept. 2020) “Turning to the issue of damages, we reject Yugo’s contention that
Gomez v Cabatic, 2018 NY Slip Op 00278 (2d Dept. 2018) “On consideration of the above authority, we now hold that where, as here, a plaintiff
Johnson v Robertson, 2015 NY Slip Op 06658 (2d Dept. 2015). Moreover, “[p]roof of damages may be based solely on oral testimony as long as the witness
Arzu v NYC Tr. Auth., 2012 NY Slip Op 22008 (Civ. Ct. Kings Co. 2012) The last thorny issue in PIP practice that has not gotten
Corona Hgts. Med., P.C. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 21130 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “Where, as here, a defendant has not
This “default” case is quite strange. SZ Med., P.C. v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20044 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2010). The majority
