Damages – expert witness not necessary
Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 02687 (3d Dept. 2020) “Turning to the issue of damages, we reject Yugo’s contention that
Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 02687 (3d Dept. 2020) “Turning to the issue of damages, we reject Yugo’s contention that
Gomez v Cabatic, 2018 NY Slip Op 00278 (2d Dept. 2018) “On consideration of the above authority, we now hold that where, as here, a plaintiff
Johnson v Robertson, 2015 NY Slip Op 06658 (2d Dept. 2015). Moreover, “[p]roof of damages may be based solely on oral testimony as long as the witness
Arzu v NYC Tr. Auth., 2012 NY Slip Op 22008 (Civ. Ct. Kings Co. 2012) The last thorny issue in PIP practice that has not gotten
This “default” case is quite strange. SZ Med., P.C. v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 20044 (App. Term 2d Dept. 2010). The majority