Improvident to examine papers
September 25, 2020 No Comments
Elusma v Jackson, 2020 NY Slip Op 04920 (2d Dept. 2020) “The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in considering the plaintiffs’ opposition papers, which were
Elusma v Jackson, 2020 NY Slip Op 04920 (2d Dept. 2020) “The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in considering the plaintiffs’ opposition papers, which were
City Chiropractic, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y., 2019 NY Slip Op 51981(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019) This only happens in Civil Kings. I
V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2018 NY Slip Op 51124(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2018) ‘We note that, although no appeal lies from a judgment
Normandin v Bell, 2018 NY Slip Op 04053 (3d Dept. 2018) “When the expert eventually arrived in the late morning of December 1, 2016, he did not
New Millennium Med. Imaging, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 51088(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention on appeal, the Civil
Brooklyn Chiropractic & Sports Therapy, P.C. v Unitrin Direct Auto Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50494(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) (1) “On the first trial date
Middle Vil. Chiropractic v Geico Gen. Ins. Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 50431(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2017) (1) “Plaintiff filed a notice of trial on February 25,
Adotey v British Airways, PLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 08341 (2d Dept. 2016) (1) “The granting of an adjournment for any purpose rests within the sound discretion
The Fourth Department, in Counsel Fin. Servs., LLC v David Mcquade Leibowitz, P.C., 2009 NY Slip Op 08663 (4th Dept. 2009), observed the following: “We note
This is similar to the cases where a peer doctor fails to review sufficient documentation before arriving at an opinion. “Lack of Foundation to form an
