Key Takeaway
Learn about the 2% monthly post-judgment interest rate in no-fault insurance cases on Long Island. Expert legal analysis from Jason Tenenbaum. Call 516-750-0595.
This article is part of our ongoing no-fault coverage, with 271 published articles analyzing no-fault issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Understanding Post-Judgment Interest Rates in No-Fault Insurance Cases: It’s 2% Per Month
A critical issue that directly affects the financial recovery of no-fault insurance claims on Long Island is the proper calculation of post-judgment interest. The Appellate Term’s decision in Health Value Med., P.C. v Country Wide Ins., 2022 NY Slip Op 51137(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022), reaffirms a crucial principle that many enforcement agents unfortunately continue to ignore: post-judgment interest in no-fault cases runs at 2% per month, not the standard 9% per annum rate.
What is Post-Judgment Interest and Why Does It Matter?
Post-judgment interest is the additional money that accumulates on an unpaid court judgment from the date the judgment is entered until it’s fully paid. Think of it as compensation for the delay in payment—money that recognizes the time value of money and provides an incentive for prompt payment of court-ordered awards.
In most civil cases, post-judgment interest runs at 9% per year. However, no-fault insurance cases operate under different rules, and the difference is dramatic:
- Standard CPLR rate: 9% per year (0.75% per month)
- No-fault Insurance Law rate: 2% per month (24% per year)
This means that in no-fault cases, unpaid judgments accumulate interest nearly three times faster than in other civil matters. For a $10,000 judgment, the difference is substantial:
- At 9% annually: $900 in interest after one year
- At 2% monthly: $2,400 in interest after one year
The Legal Foundation: Insurance Law § 5106
The Health Value Med. case provides crystal-clear guidance on which law governs post-judgment interest in no-fault cases. The court stated: “We note that, contrary to the statement of the Civil Court, post-judgment interest in a no-fault action is governed by Insurance Law § 5106 and its implementing regulations, not the CPLR (see Matter of B.Z. Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 197 AD3d 144).”
This ruling eliminates any ambiguity. Insurance Law § 5106 and its regulations, which establish the 2% monthly rate, specifically control post-judgment interest in no-fault matters. The general CPLR provisions that apply to other civil cases simply don’t apply here.
The B.Z. Chiropractic Precedent
The Health Value Med. decision builds upon the earlier B.Z. Chiropractic case, which firmly established this principle. These appellate decisions create binding precedent that should eliminate confusion about the applicable interest rate. Yet, as Attorney Jason Tenenbaum notes, practical enforcement problems persist.
The Enforcement Problem: Why Some Agents Refuse to Apply the Correct Rate
Despite clear appellate precedent, Attorney Tenenbaum observes a frustrating reality: “What is rather disappointing is that despite the Appellate Decision, which is as clear as the night is long that post-judgment PIP interest runs at 2% per month, certain enforcement agents refuse to calculate interest at more than 9% per annum.”
This refusal by some enforcement agents to properly calculate interest creates several problems:
- Underpayment of judgments: Creditors receive significantly less than they’re legally entitled to
- Additional legal costs: Motions for unpaid interest and additional attorney fees become necessary
- Delayed resolution: Cases that should be concluded drag on due to interest disputes
- Systemic inefficiency: Clear legal precedent is ignored, wasting judicial resources
What This Means for You
If You’re a Healthcare Provider
As a medical provider seeking payment for no-fault services, understanding post-judgment interest rates is crucial to protecting your financial interests. When insurance companies delay payment and you’re forced to obtain a judgment, that 2% monthly interest rate becomes a powerful tool for ensuring fair compensation.
Key considerations for providers include:
- Track interest carefully: Calculate interest from the judgment date using the correct 2% monthly rate
- Document underpayments: Keep detailed records when enforcement agents use incorrect rates
- Know your rights: You’re entitled to the full statutory interest rate, not a reduced amount
- Seek legal help: Don’t accept underpayment when agents refuse to apply correct rates
If You’re an Injured Party with an Attorney Fee Award
Injured parties who recover attorney fees as part of their personal injury case may also benefit from proper post-judgment interest calculation. If your attorney fee award isn’t paid promptly, the 2% monthly interest rate applies to that judgment as well.
This protection ensures that:
- Insurance companies can’t delay payment without significant cost
- Your legal team is properly compensated for their efforts
- You receive the full benefit of court-ordered awards
- Justice isn’t undermined by payment delays
The Strategic Implications of Proper Interest Calculation
The 2% monthly interest rate serves important policy purposes in New York’s no-fault system:
Incentivizing Prompt Payment
The high interest rate encourages insurance companies to pay legitimate claims promptly rather than dragging out litigation. A 24% annual rate makes delay expensive, aligning the interests of justice with the interests of efficiency.
Compensating for Delayed Payment
Medical providers and injured parties often wait months or years for payment while pursuing no-fault claims. The 2% monthly rate helps compensate for this delay and the lost opportunity to use those funds.
Enforcing System Integrity
When enforcement agents refuse to apply correct interest rates, they undermine the effectiveness of the statutory scheme. Proper enforcement ensures the system works as intended.
Practical Steps When Facing Interest Calculation Disputes
When enforcement agents refuse to calculate interest at the proper 2% monthly rate, several legal options are available:
Motion for Proper Interest Calculation
As Attorney Tenenbaum notes, the result of improper interest calculation is often “motions for unpaid interest and additional attorneys fees.” These motions serve to:
- Establish the correct amount owed under Insurance Law § 5106
- Recover the differential between what was paid and what was owed
- Seek attorney fees for having to bring the motion
- Create precedent for future enforcement actions
Contempt Proceedings
In extreme cases where enforcement agents persistently refuse to follow court orders regarding interest calculation, contempt proceedings may be appropriate to compel compliance with the law.
Alternative Enforcement Methods
When traditional enforcement mechanisms fail, other collection methods may be necessary to recover the full amount owed, including proper interest calculations.
The Broader Impact on No-Fault Practice
Proper post-judgment interest calculation affects the entire no-fault insurance ecosystem on Long Island and throughout New York:
For Medical Providers
Providers depend on timely payment for no-fault services. When judgments aren’t paid promptly with proper interest, it affects cash flow and business operations. The 2% monthly rate helps ensure that delays in payment don’t unfairly burden healthcare providers.
For Attorneys
Legal professionals representing providers and injured parties must understand these interest calculation rules to properly advise clients and calculate potential recoveries. Failure to account for proper interest rates can result in significant undervaluation of claims.
For the Court System
When enforcement agents ignore established precedent on interest rates, it creates additional litigation and wastes judicial resources. Proper compliance with Insurance Law § 5106 would eliminate much unnecessary motion practice.
Frequently Asked Questions About Post-Judgment Interest in No-Fault Cases
Why is the interest rate different in no-fault cases?
No-fault insurance operates under Insurance Law § 5106, which establishes a 2% monthly interest rate to ensure prompt payment of medical bills and other benefits. This rate is higher than the general CPLR rate because the Legislature wanted to incentivize quick payment in the no-fault system.
When does post-judgment interest begin to accrue?
Post-judgment interest begins accruing from the date the judgment is entered, not from the date of the underlying claim or bill. This interest continues until the judgment is fully satisfied.
What should I do if an enforcement agent refuses to apply the 2% monthly rate?
You should immediately contact an experienced no-fault attorney who can file a motion to compel proper interest calculation and seek attorney fees for the additional work required. Don’t accept underpayment when the law clearly entitles you to the higher rate.
Can the 2% monthly rate compound?
Yes, under Insurance Law § 5106, interest compounds monthly. This means you earn interest on previously accrued interest, which can significantly increase the amount owed over time.
Does the 2% rate apply to attorney fee judgments in no-fault cases?
Yes, attorney fee awards in no-fault cases are subject to the same 2% monthly post-judgment interest rate. This ensures that legal professionals are properly compensated even when insurance companies delay payment of fee awards.
The Bottom Line: Know Your Rights and Protect Your Interests
The Health Value Med. decision makes it unequivocally clear that post-judgment interest in no-fault cases runs at 2% per month under Insurance Law § 5106, not the 9% annual rate under the CPLR. This difference can amount to thousands of dollars on significant judgments.
Don’t let enforcement agents shortchange you by applying the wrong interest rate. The law is clear, the precedent is established, and you have the right to receive the full amount owed under the statute.
At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, we understand the importance of proper post-judgment interest calculation in no-fault insurance matters. We’ve seen firsthand how improper interest calculations can cost our clients thousands of dollars in rightful compensation.
We know how to:
- Calculate interest properly under Insurance Law § 5106
- Challenge enforcement agents who refuse to apply correct rates
- File effective motions for unpaid interest and attorney fees
- Maximize recovery for our clients through proper legal advocacy
If you have a no-fault insurance judgment that isn’t being paid with proper 2% monthly post-judgment interest, don’t accept less than you’re legally entitled to receive. Call 516-750-0595 for a free consultation with an experienced Long Island attorney who will fight to ensure you receive every dollar you’re owed under the law.
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York's no-fault insurance system, established under Insurance Law Article 51, is one of the most complex insurance frameworks in the country. Every motorist must carry Personal Injury Protection coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of fault, up to $50,000 per person.
But insurers routinely deny valid claims using peer reviews, EUO scheduling tactics, fee schedule reductions, and coverage defenses. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has handled over 100,000 no-fault cases since 2002 — from initial claim submissions through arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, trials in Civil Court and Supreme Court, and appeals to the Appellate Term and Appellate Division. Jason Tenenbaum is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
His 2,353+ published legal articles on no-fault practice are cited by attorneys throughout New York. Whether you are dealing with a medical necessity denial, an EUO no-show defense, a fee schedule dispute, or a coverage question, this article provides the kind of detailed case-law analysis that helps practitioners and claimants understand exactly where the law stands.
About This Topic
New York No-Fault Insurance Law
New York's no-fault insurance system requires every driver to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of who caused the accident. But insurers routinely deny, delay, and underpay valid claims — using peer reviews, IME no-shows, and fee schedule defenses to avoid paying providers and injured claimants. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has litigated thousands of no-fault arbitrations and court cases since 2002.
271 published articles in No-Fault
Keep Reading
More No-Fault Analysis
Priority of Payment Regulation Has No Force in Arbitration: First and Second Departments Agree
Both the First and Second Departments have held that the priority of payment regulation under 11 NYCRR 65-3.15 is of no force or effect in no-fault arbitration proceedings....
Feb 25, 2026How Insurance Companies Use Colossus Software to Undervalue Your Injury Claim
Insurance companies use Colossus software to lowball your injury claim. Learn how this system works and how a Long Island attorney can fight back. Call 516-750-0595.
Feb 18, 2026A good third party vendor can prove mailing
Court ruling shows third party vendor TrackRight reports can establish proper mailing procedures for RPAPL 1304 compliance in foreclosure cases.
Feb 18, 2022Why are beaches still open?
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum questions inconsistent COVID-19 response policies in March 2020, examining why beaches remained open during early pandemic lockdowns.
Mar 23, 2020Landlord Tenant (of interest to a few of you)
New York landlord-tenant law case Guy v Washington on estoppel when landlords request early vacation and tenant compliance bars lease enforcement.
Aug 25, 2014Insurance Company Rehabilitation: Understanding Complex Legal Transitions in New York
Learn about insurance company rehabilitation in New York, including the landmark Interboro case and how Article 73 & 74 of Insurance Law affect no-fault claims and policyholders.
May 28, 2009Was this article helpful?
About the Author
Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a no-fault matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.