Skip to main content
Again, it is 2% per month on the judgment
No-Fault

Again, it is 2% per month on the judgment

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Learn about the 2% monthly post-judgment interest rate in no-fault insurance cases on Long Island. Expert legal analysis from Jason Tenenbaum. Call 516-750-0595.

This article is part of our ongoing no-fault coverage, with 271 published articles analyzing no-fault issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

Understanding Post-Judgment Interest Rates in No-Fault Insurance Cases: It’s 2% Per Month

A critical issue that directly affects the financial recovery of no-fault insurance claims on Long Island is the proper calculation of post-judgment interest. The Appellate Term’s decision in Health Value Med., P.C. v Country Wide Ins., 2022 NY Slip Op 51137(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022), reaffirms a crucial principle that many enforcement agents unfortunately continue to ignore: post-judgment interest in no-fault cases runs at 2% per month, not the standard 9% per annum rate.

What is Post-Judgment Interest and Why Does It Matter?

Post-judgment interest is the additional money that accumulates on an unpaid court judgment from the date the judgment is entered until it’s fully paid. Think of it as compensation for the delay in payment—money that recognizes the time value of money and provides an incentive for prompt payment of court-ordered awards.

In most civil cases, post-judgment interest runs at 9% per year. However, no-fault insurance cases operate under different rules, and the difference is dramatic:

  • Standard CPLR rate: 9% per year (0.75% per month)
  • No-fault Insurance Law rate: 2% per month (24% per year)

This means that in no-fault cases, unpaid judgments accumulate interest nearly three times faster than in other civil matters. For a $10,000 judgment, the difference is substantial:

  • At 9% annually: $900 in interest after one year
  • At 2% monthly: $2,400 in interest after one year

The Health Value Med. case provides crystal-clear guidance on which law governs post-judgment interest in no-fault cases. The court stated: “We note that, contrary to the statement of the Civil Court, post-judgment interest in a no-fault action is governed by Insurance Law § 5106 and its implementing regulations, not the CPLR (see Matter of B.Z. Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 197 AD3d 144).”

This ruling eliminates any ambiguity. Insurance Law § 5106 and its regulations, which establish the 2% monthly rate, specifically control post-judgment interest in no-fault matters. The general CPLR provisions that apply to other civil cases simply don’t apply here.

The B.Z. Chiropractic Precedent

The Health Value Med. decision builds upon the earlier B.Z. Chiropractic case, which firmly established this principle. These appellate decisions create binding precedent that should eliminate confusion about the applicable interest rate. Yet, as Attorney Jason Tenenbaum notes, practical enforcement problems persist.

The Enforcement Problem: Why Some Agents Refuse to Apply the Correct Rate

Despite clear appellate precedent, Attorney Tenenbaum observes a frustrating reality: “What is rather disappointing is that despite the Appellate Decision, which is as clear as the night is long that post-judgment PIP interest runs at 2% per month, certain enforcement agents refuse to calculate interest at more than 9% per annum.”

This refusal by some enforcement agents to properly calculate interest creates several problems:

  • Underpayment of judgments: Creditors receive significantly less than they’re legally entitled to
  • Additional legal costs: Motions for unpaid interest and additional attorney fees become necessary
  • Delayed resolution: Cases that should be concluded drag on due to interest disputes
  • Systemic inefficiency: Clear legal precedent is ignored, wasting judicial resources

What This Means for You

If You’re a Healthcare Provider

As a medical provider seeking payment for no-fault services, understanding post-judgment interest rates is crucial to protecting your financial interests. When insurance companies delay payment and you’re forced to obtain a judgment, that 2% monthly interest rate becomes a powerful tool for ensuring fair compensation.

Key considerations for providers include:

  • Track interest carefully: Calculate interest from the judgment date using the correct 2% monthly rate
  • Document underpayments: Keep detailed records when enforcement agents use incorrect rates
  • Know your rights: You’re entitled to the full statutory interest rate, not a reduced amount
  • Seek legal help: Don’t accept underpayment when agents refuse to apply correct rates

If You’re an Injured Party with an Attorney Fee Award

Injured parties who recover attorney fees as part of their personal injury case may also benefit from proper post-judgment interest calculation. If your attorney fee award isn’t paid promptly, the 2% monthly interest rate applies to that judgment as well.

This protection ensures that:

  • Insurance companies can’t delay payment without significant cost
  • Your legal team is properly compensated for their efforts
  • You receive the full benefit of court-ordered awards
  • Justice isn’t undermined by payment delays

The Strategic Implications of Proper Interest Calculation

The 2% monthly interest rate serves important policy purposes in New York’s no-fault system:

Incentivizing Prompt Payment

The high interest rate encourages insurance companies to pay legitimate claims promptly rather than dragging out litigation. A 24% annual rate makes delay expensive, aligning the interests of justice with the interests of efficiency.

Compensating for Delayed Payment

Medical providers and injured parties often wait months or years for payment while pursuing no-fault claims. The 2% monthly rate helps compensate for this delay and the lost opportunity to use those funds.

Enforcing System Integrity

When enforcement agents refuse to apply correct interest rates, they undermine the effectiveness of the statutory scheme. Proper enforcement ensures the system works as intended.

Practical Steps When Facing Interest Calculation Disputes

When enforcement agents refuse to calculate interest at the proper 2% monthly rate, several legal options are available:

Motion for Proper Interest Calculation

As Attorney Tenenbaum notes, the result of improper interest calculation is often “motions for unpaid interest and additional attorneys fees.” These motions serve to:

  • Establish the correct amount owed under Insurance Law § 5106
  • Recover the differential between what was paid and what was owed
  • Seek attorney fees for having to bring the motion
  • Create precedent for future enforcement actions

Contempt Proceedings

In extreme cases where enforcement agents persistently refuse to follow court orders regarding interest calculation, contempt proceedings may be appropriate to compel compliance with the law.

Alternative Enforcement Methods

When traditional enforcement mechanisms fail, other collection methods may be necessary to recover the full amount owed, including proper interest calculations.

The Broader Impact on No-Fault Practice

Proper post-judgment interest calculation affects the entire no-fault insurance ecosystem on Long Island and throughout New York:

For Medical Providers

Providers depend on timely payment for no-fault services. When judgments aren’t paid promptly with proper interest, it affects cash flow and business operations. The 2% monthly rate helps ensure that delays in payment don’t unfairly burden healthcare providers.

For Attorneys

Legal professionals representing providers and injured parties must understand these interest calculation rules to properly advise clients and calculate potential recoveries. Failure to account for proper interest rates can result in significant undervaluation of claims.

For the Court System

When enforcement agents ignore established precedent on interest rates, it creates additional litigation and wastes judicial resources. Proper compliance with Insurance Law § 5106 would eliminate much unnecessary motion practice.

Frequently Asked Questions About Post-Judgment Interest in No-Fault Cases

Why is the interest rate different in no-fault cases?

No-fault insurance operates under Insurance Law § 5106, which establishes a 2% monthly interest rate to ensure prompt payment of medical bills and other benefits. This rate is higher than the general CPLR rate because the Legislature wanted to incentivize quick payment in the no-fault system.

When does post-judgment interest begin to accrue?

Post-judgment interest begins accruing from the date the judgment is entered, not from the date of the underlying claim or bill. This interest continues until the judgment is fully satisfied.

What should I do if an enforcement agent refuses to apply the 2% monthly rate?

You should immediately contact an experienced no-fault attorney who can file a motion to compel proper interest calculation and seek attorney fees for the additional work required. Don’t accept underpayment when the law clearly entitles you to the higher rate.

Can the 2% monthly rate compound?

Yes, under Insurance Law § 5106, interest compounds monthly. This means you earn interest on previously accrued interest, which can significantly increase the amount owed over time.

Does the 2% rate apply to attorney fee judgments in no-fault cases?

Yes, attorney fee awards in no-fault cases are subject to the same 2% monthly post-judgment interest rate. This ensures that legal professionals are properly compensated even when insurance companies delay payment of fee awards.

The Bottom Line: Know Your Rights and Protect Your Interests

The Health Value Med. decision makes it unequivocally clear that post-judgment interest in no-fault cases runs at 2% per month under Insurance Law § 5106, not the 9% annual rate under the CPLR. This difference can amount to thousands of dollars on significant judgments.

Don’t let enforcement agents shortchange you by applying the wrong interest rate. The law is clear, the precedent is established, and you have the right to receive the full amount owed under the statute.

At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, we understand the importance of proper post-judgment interest calculation in no-fault insurance matters. We’ve seen firsthand how improper interest calculations can cost our clients thousands of dollars in rightful compensation.

We know how to:

  • Calculate interest properly under Insurance Law § 5106
  • Challenge enforcement agents who refuse to apply correct rates
  • File effective motions for unpaid interest and attorney fees
  • Maximize recovery for our clients through proper legal advocacy

If you have a no-fault insurance judgment that isn’t being paid with proper 2% monthly post-judgment interest, don’t accept less than you’re legally entitled to receive. Call 516-750-0595 for a free consultation with an experienced Long Island attorney who will fight to ensure you receive every dollar you’re owed under the law.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York's no-fault insurance system, established under Insurance Law Article 51, is one of the most complex insurance frameworks in the country. Every motorist must carry Personal Injury Protection coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of fault, up to $50,000 per person.

But insurers routinely deny valid claims using peer reviews, EUO scheduling tactics, fee schedule reductions, and coverage defenses. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has handled over 100,000 no-fault cases since 2002 — from initial claim submissions through arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, trials in Civil Court and Supreme Court, and appeals to the Appellate Term and Appellate Division. Jason Tenenbaum is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

His 2,353+ published legal articles on no-fault practice are cited by attorneys throughout New York. Whether you are dealing with a medical necessity denial, an EUO no-show defense, a fee schedule dispute, or a coverage question, this article provides the kind of detailed case-law analysis that helps practitioners and claimants understand exactly where the law stands.

About This Topic

New York No-Fault Insurance Law

New York's no-fault insurance system requires every driver to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of who caused the accident. But insurers routinely deny, delay, and underpay valid claims — using peer reviews, IME no-shows, and fee schedule defenses to avoid paying providers and injured claimants. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has litigated thousands of no-fault arbitrations and court cases since 2002.

271 published articles in No-Fault

Keep Reading

More No-Fault Analysis

View all No-Fault articles

Was this article helpful?

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.

24+ years in practice 1,000+ appeals written 100K+ no-fault cases $100M+ recovered

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a no-fault matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filed under: No-Fault
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Legal Resources

Understanding New York No-Fault Law

New York has a unique legal landscape that affects how no-fault cases are litigated and resolved. The state's court system includes the Civil Court (for claims up to $25,000), the Supreme Court (the primary trial court for unlimited jurisdiction), the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts), the Appellate Division (divided into four Departments, with the Second Department covering Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and several upstate counties), and the Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). Each court has its own procedural requirements, local rules, and case-assignment practices that can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

For no-fault matters on Long Island, cases are typically filed in Nassau County Supreme Court (at the courthouse in Mineola) or Suffolk County Supreme Court (in Riverhead). No-fault arbitrations are heard through the American Arbitration Association, which assigns arbitrators throughout the metropolitan area. Workers' compensation claims go to the Workers' Compensation Board, with hearings at district offices across the state. Understanding which forum is appropriate for your case — and the specific procedural rules that apply — is essential for a successful outcome.

The procedural landscape in New York also includes important timing requirements that can affect your case. Most civil actions are subject to statutes of limitations ranging from one year (for intentional torts and claims against municipalities) to six years (for contract actions). Personal injury cases generally have a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5), while medical malpractice claims must be filed within two and a half years under CPLR 214-a. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including 30-day filing requirements for applications and 45-day deadlines for provider claims. Understanding and complying with these deadlines is critical — missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case may be on the merits.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum regularly practices in all of these venues. His office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, NY 11746, is centrally located on Long Island, providing convenient access to courts and offices throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City. Whether you need representation in a no-fault arbitration, a personal injury trial, an employment discrimination hearing, or an appeal to the Appellate Division, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. brings $24+ years of real courtroom experience to your case. If you have questions about the legal issues discussed in this article, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, no-obligation consultation.

New York's substantive law also presents distinct challenges. In motor vehicle cases, the no-fault system under Insurance Law Article 51 provides first-party benefits regardless of fault, but limits the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the plaintiff establishes a "serious injury" under one of nine statutory categories. This threshold — codified at Insurance Law Section 5102(d) — requires medical evidence showing more than a minor or subjective injury, and courts have developed detailed standards for each category. Fractures must be documented through imaging studies. Claims of permanent consequential limitation or significant limitation of use require quantified range-of-motion testing with comparison to norms. The 90/180-day category demands proof that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident.

In employment discrimination cases, the legal standards vary depending on whether the claim arises under state or local law. The New York State Human Rights Law employs a burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by showing membership in a protected class, qualification for the position, an adverse employment action, and circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision. If the employer meets this burden, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the stated reason is pretextual. The New York City Human Rights Law, by contrast, applies a broader standard, asking whether the plaintiff was treated less well than other employees because of a protected characteristic.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review