Skip to main content
Justification for a lt
No-Fault

Justification for a lt

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

New York no-fault case shows how healthcare providers can justify failure to comply with insurance verification requests during claims processing.

Understanding Verification Request Compliance in No-Fault Claims

In New York’s no-fault insurance system, healthcare providers must navigate complex verification requirements when submitting claims. Insurance companies routinely request additional documentation to verify claims, and providers’ responses can make or break their ability to recover payment. A recent Appellate Term decision highlights a crucial but often overlooked aspect of this process: the ability to provide reasonable justification for non-compliance with verification requests.

The case demonstrates how providers can potentially avoid claim denials even when they cannot fully comply with every verification request, provided they can articulate proper justification during the claims processing stage.

Jason Tenenbaum’s Analysis:

Burke Physical Therapy, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 50623(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2022)

“While defendant’s claims specialist stated that defendant had not received any of the documents that defendant’s verification requests sought to obtain, plaintiff’s owner merely stated that he had mailed the requested verification “to the extent such response was proper and in possession.” Thus, [*2]plaintiff failed to demonstrate that it had provided the requested verification or had set forth a reasonable justification for the failure to comply with defendant’s verification requests (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 ). Consequently, we find no basis to disturb the order”

That underline passage is important. If performed during the claims processing stage and the basis is properly articulated, the App. Term may go along with it,“

Key Takeaway

Healthcare providers don’t always need to provide every document requested in insurance verification demands. However, they must either comply fully or provide reasonable justification for non-compliance during the initial claims process, not after litigation begins. Vague responses about mailing documents “to the extent proper” won’t suffice.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is New York's no-fault insurance system?

New York's no-fault insurance system requires all drivers to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage. This pays for medical expenses and lost wages regardless of who caused the accident, up to policy limits. However, you can only sue for additional damages if you meet the 'serious injury' threshold.

Filed under: No-Fault
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Long Island Legal Services

Explore Related Practice Areas

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.