Laches – remember that word?
Recent NY court ruling clarifies that laches cannot dismiss complaints without proper CPLR 3216 demand, reinforcing procedural requirements in litigation.
Laches – remember that word? — Read More →25 articles published in February 2020
The articles below were published in February 2020 by Attorney Jason Tenenbaum and the legal team at his Long Island law office. Each article provides detailed analysis of real court decisions, statutory developments, and procedural issues in New York personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment law.
Attorney Tenenbaum has maintained this legal blog since 2008, creating one of the most comprehensive public archives of New York insurance and personal injury case law analysis available online. Every article draws on his firsthand experience litigating cases in Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts, New York City Civil Court, and the Appellate Term. Unlike generic legal content, these articles cite specific case holdings, analyze judicial reasoning, and identify practical takeaways for attorneys and claimants navigating New York's complex legal landscape.
Whether you are an attorney researching a procedural question, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your legal rights after an accident or workplace dispute, this archive offers substantive legal analysis grounded in real New York courtroom experience. For case-specific legal advice, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Recent NY court ruling clarifies that laches cannot dismiss complaints without proper CPLR 3216 demand, reinforcing procedural requirements in litigation.
Laches – remember that word? — Read More →Court rejects attorney affirmation lacking personal knowledge in IME no-show case, highlighting the importance of proper evidence in no-fault insurance disputes.
IME excuse without personal knowledge — Read More →Court accepts calendar service failure as reasonable excuse for default, allowing plaintiff to vacate summary judgment when attorney never received briefing schedule notification.
Calendar service did not transmit the adjournment stipulation — Read More →NY Court rules on no-fault policy exhaustion when healthcare provider defaults on EUO verification requirements in Ameriprise v Kensington Radiology case.
Policy exhaustion, again — Read More →Court takes judicial notice of permanent stay order in no-fault insurance case, rendering declaratory judgment appeal academic under NY law.
DJ following a default — Read More →New York appellate court clarifies that submitting fresh evidence or arguments in reply papers provides reasonable justification for granting motion renewal.
Here is a procedural one for you — Read More →Jamaica Wellness Appellate Division victories: Fourth Department clarifies successive summary judgment motions in no-fault insurance cases following prior appeal decisions.
Post Jamaica Wellness Appellate Division victories — Read More →New York court clarifies that reasonable excuse standards are relaxed for short-term defaults in no-fault insurance cases, providing relief for late responses.
Reasonable excuse relaxed — Read More →Court denies motion to vacate default judgment when plaintiff fails to demonstrate meritorious defense, despite questions about reasonable excuse for the default.
More Defaults — Read More →Court ruling clarifies NF-10 denial forms don't need specific EUO dates, highlighting inconsistent First Department decisions in no-fault insurance cases.
A valid NF-10 — Read More →Court ruling on VTL 313 requirements for policy cancellation, including proper mailing procedures and DMV filing compliance within 30 days.
VTL 313 in action — Read More →New York court ruling demonstrates how healthcare providers can lose no-fault claims due to verification failures and fee schedule violations in insurance disputes.
120-day rule and Fee Schedule — Read More →New York court rules on forum non conveniens doctrine in no-fault insurance provider case, examining jurisdiction factors and witness hardship requirements.
Forum Non Conveniens — Read More →Court ruling clarifies insurance companies must schedule IMEs within 30 days of receiving claims, or lose the right to deny payment based on no-shows.
It’s the 30-day rule — Read More →Analysis of Blackman v Nationwide Ins. case addressing verification affidavit mailing presumptions and fee schedule defense preservation requirements in NY no-fault law.
Verification and fee schedule issues — Read More →New York no-fault insurance statute of limitations analysis: when causes of action accrue and collateral estoppel defense strategies in medical provider cases.
Another Statute of limitations — Read More →New York no-fault insurers must request examinations under oath within 30 days of receiving claims, or the requests become invalid under the Neptune rule.
The Neptune rule — Read More →Court ruling clarifies timing requirements for second EUO scheduling letters in no-fault insurance cases, emphasizing strict compliance with regulatory deadlines.
Untimely second letter — Read More →New York court case highlights importance of proper documentation when resubmitting no-fault insurance claims to avoid summary judgment dismissal.
Non receipt — Read More →Civil Kings court case on attorney representation requirements and default judgment appeals in no-fault insurance litigation.
Who is the attorney? — Read More →Court rules partial summary judgment cannot be granted when one party claims mailing and another denies receipt, creating triable issues of fact in insurance disputes.
Partial summary judgment cannot be granted on non-receipt — Read More →Florida insurance policy rescission requirements under state law - notice to insured and premium return mandates for valid ab initio rescission in New York courts.
Rescinding a policy in accordance with Florida law — Read More →Settlement of default judgments in NY: five days notice required when defendant previously appeared. Court jurisdiction and CPLR 3215 requirements explained.
Settlement of a default judgment — Read More →New York no-fault insurance arbitration waiver rules - when prior arbitration election bars subsequent court litigation under Ultimate Health Products v Ameriprise case law.
Prior Arb? — Read More →Court rules Notice of Trial equivalent to Note of Issue for summary judgment timing; defendant's late motion served 120+ days after filing denied under CPLR 3212.
The quaint Notice of Trial — Read More →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes legal analysis on a regular basis covering developments in New York personal injury litigation, no-fault insurance disputes, employment discrimination, and related practice areas. Attorney Tenenbaum started writing about New York case law in 2008, and the blog has grown into a library of over 2,353 articles analyzing court decisions from the Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals.
Topics frequently covered include the prima facie case standard in no-fault actions, the 30-day preclusion rule under Insurance Regulation 192, IME and EUO no-show defenses, summary judgment practice under CPLR 3212, default judgment standards, verification and claims submission procedures, and the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law Section 5102(d). Employment law articles address wrongful termination, workplace discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, wage and hour violations, and employer retaliation claims.
Each article is written for a professional audience but remains accessible to non-lawyers seeking to understand how New York courts handle specific legal issues. The firm serves clients across Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. If you have a legal question about any topic covered in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential consultation.
New York's civil court system is one of the most complex in the nation, with multiple overlapping jurisdictions that affect how personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment cases are litigated. The New York City Civil Court handles claims up to $25,000 in the five boroughs, while the District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk Counties handle similar matters on Long Island. For claims exceeding $25,000, the Supreme Court serves as the primary trial court with unlimited monetary jurisdiction. Despite its name, the Supreme Court is not the highest court in New York — that distinction belongs to the Court of Appeals, which sits in Albany and decides approximately 200 cases per year.
Appeals from Civil Court and District Court decisions go to the Appellate Term, which is divided into departments corresponding to the Appellate Division. The Appellate Term for the Second Department — which covers Nassau County, Suffolk County, Kings County (Brooklyn), Queens County, and Richmond County (Staten Island) — hears hundreds of no-fault insurance appeals each year and has developed a substantial body of case law on topics including timely denial, verification procedures, proof of mailing, fee schedule disputes, and medical necessity standards. The Appellate Division, Second Department, hears appeals from Supreme Court and from the Appellate Term, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts within its jurisdiction.
Understanding where your case falls within this system is critical. A no-fault insurance dispute involving a $3,000 medical bill will follow a very different procedural path than a $500,000 personal injury claim arising from the same automobile accident. The former is typically resolved through mandatory arbitration before the American Arbitration Association under Insurance Department Regulation 68, while the latter proceeds through Supreme Court with full discovery, independent medical examinations under CPLR 3121, depositions, and potentially a jury trial. Attorney Tenenbaum has practiced extensively in all of these venues and understands the strategic considerations unique to each.
Several statutes and regulations appear frequently in the articles archived on this page. Insurance Law Article 51 establishes New York's no-fault insurance framework, requiring every motor vehicle policy to include personal injury protection benefits covering medical expenses, lost earnings (up to $2,000 per month), and other basic economic loss up to $50,000 per person. 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 (Insurance Regulation 192) imposes a 30-day deadline on insurers to pay or deny no-fault claims after receiving proof of claim and all demanded verification, and the failure to timely deny results in preclusion of most coverage defenses.
In personal injury litigation, Insurance Law Section 5102(d) defines the categories of "serious injury" that a plaintiff must establish before recovering non-economic damages in a motor vehicle accident case. The nine categories — death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, fracture, loss of a fetus, permanent loss of use, permanent consequential limitation, significant limitation of use, and the 90/180-day category — each have specific evidentiary requirements that have been refined through decades of appellate decisions. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has litigated serious injury threshold motions in hundreds of cases and regularly writes about new developments in this area.
Employment claims in New York implicate both state and federal statutes. The New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law Section 296) prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, and domestic violence victim status. The New York City Human Rights Law provides even broader protections and applies a more liberal standard. At the federal level, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act provide additional protections but are subject to administrative exhaustion requirements through the EEOC.
Workers' compensation cases in New York are governed by the Workers' Compensation Law and administered by the Workers' Compensation Board. Injured workers are entitled to medical treatment, lost wage benefits (typically two-thirds of the average weekly wage, subject to a statutory maximum), and permanency awards for lasting disabilities. Third-party claims — such as personal injury lawsuits against property owners or general contractors under Labor Law Sections 200, 240, and 241 — often run parallel to workers' compensation proceedings and involve complex lien and subrogation issues that require experienced legal counsel to navigate properly.
The articles in this archive analyze real decisions from courts across New York State, with a particular focus on the Appellate Term and Appellate Division decisions that establish binding precedent for trial courts on Long Island and in New York City. Whether you are an attorney preparing a motion, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your rights, these articles provide the detailed legal analysis that generic legal websites simply cannot offer. For personalized advice about your specific situation, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. serves clients from its office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. The firm represents individuals and businesses throughout Long Island — including the towns of Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton, Huntington, and Oyster Bay in Suffolk County, and the cities and villages of Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa, and Levittown in Nassau County. The firm also handles cases in all five boroughs of New York City: Queens, Brooklyn (Kings County), Manhattan (New York County), the Bronx, and Staten Island (Richmond County). Court appearances are regularly made at Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, the Suffolk County District Court, and the New York City Civil Court throughout the five boroughs.
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.