Key Takeaway
Learn about Examination Under Oath (EUO) requirements in NY personal injury cases. Expert legal guidance on EUO procedures. Call 516-750-0595.
This article is part of our ongoing euo issues coverage, with 197 published articles analyzing euo issues issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Examination Under Oath (EUO) requirements represent one of the most challenging aspects of personal injury insurance claims in New York. Recent Appellate Term decisions provide crucial guidance on when insurance companies can demand these examinations and what standards they must meet. Understanding these requirements can mean the difference between receiving your rightful benefits and having your claim denied.
Recent EUO Case Law: What the Courts Are Saying
The “No Objective Basis Required” Standard
Several recent Appellate Term decisions have established a clear standard that favors insurance companies in EUO disputes:
In LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Automotive Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50696(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019), the court held: “Furthermore, defendant was not required to set forth objective reasons for requesting the EUOs in order to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.”
This decision was echoed in Bronx Chiropractic Care, P.C. v State Farm Ins., 2019 NY Slip Op 50700(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019): “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, defendant was not required to set forth objective reasons for requesting EUOs in order to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.”
The 30-Day Rule: Critical Timing Requirements
However, insurance companies are not given unlimited power. In K.O. Med., P.C. v IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50687(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019), the court provided important protection for claimants:
“Plaintiff correctly argues that the initial EUO scheduling letter sent to plaintiff had been sent more than 30 days after defendant had received the claims seeking $348.80, $204.41, $148.69, and $91.42. As a result, the request was a nullity as to those claims.”
What is an Examination Under Oath?
Definition and Purpose
An Examination Under Oath (EUO) is a formal procedure where an insurance company requires a claimant to answer questions under oath about their accident, injuries, and treatment. This examination is conducted outside of court, typically in a law office, with a court reporter present to record testimony.
When Insurance Companies Request EUOs
Insurance companies typically request EUOs in personal injury cases when they:
- Suspect potential fraud or misrepresentation
- Need additional information about the accident circumstances
- Want to clarify medical treatment details
- Seek to establish the extent of injuries and damages
- Require documentation of claimed losses
Your Rights During an EUO
As a personal injury victim, you have specific rights during an EUO:
- Right to Legal Representation: You can have your attorney present during the examination
- Right to Object: Your lawyer can object to improper questions
- Right to Clarity: Questions must be clear and relevant to your claim
- Right to Take Breaks: Reasonable breaks should be allowed during lengthy examinations
- Right to Review: You can review and correct the transcript if necessary
The Impact on Personal Injury Cases
No-Fault Insurance Claims
In New York’s no-fault insurance system, EUOs are commonly requested for car accident cases involving:
Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Benefits:
- Medical expense reimbursement
- Lost wage compensation
- Essential services benefits
- Transportation to medical appointments
Common EUO Topics in No-Fault Cases:
- Details of the accident
- Pre-existing medical conditions
- Current treatment and providers
- Work history and income verification
- Daily activities and limitations
Third-Party Liability Claims
For motor vehicle accident third-party claims, EUOs may cover:
- Circumstances surrounding the accident
- Liability determinations
- Extent of property damage
- Medical treatment and expenses
- Lost wages and future earning capacity
Strategic Considerations for Personal Injury Victims
Timing Issues: The 30-Day Window
One of the most crucial aspects of EUO law is the timing requirement. Insurance companies generally have 30 days from receiving a claim to schedule an EUO. If they fail to meet this deadline, the EUO request may be invalid, as demonstrated in the K.O. Med case.
Key Timing Points:
- 30-day deadline starts when the insurer receives the claim
- Delay letters do not toll this period
- Late EUO requests may be deemed nullities
- Proper notice requirements must be met
What Happens if You Don’t Attend
Failing to appear for a properly scheduled EUO can have serious consequences:
In BC Chiropractic, P.C. v Farmers New Century Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50680(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019), the court noted that when “plaintiff’s assignor had failed to appear on either date” for scheduled EUOs, the insurer could “timely deny” the claim on that ground.
Consequences of Non-Appearance:
- Claim denial
- Loss of benefits
- Potential forfeiture of coverage
- Difficulty in future negotiations
Preparation Strategies for EUOs
Document Review
Before your EUO, thoroughly review:
- Accident Documentation: Police reports, photos, witness statements
- Medical Records: All treatment records, diagnostic tests, surgical reports
- Financial Documents: Pay stubs, tax returns, business records
- Insurance Policies: Coverage limits, deductibles, exclusions
- Prior Claims History: Any previous insurance claims or lawsuits
Working with Your Attorney
Your personal injury attorney plays a crucial role in EUO preparation:
Pre-EUO Preparation:
- Review potential questions and appropriate answers
- Identify areas of vulnerability or concern
- Prepare supporting documentation
- Discuss strategies for handling difficult questions
During the EUO:
- Object to improper or irrelevant questions
- Ensure questions are clear and understandable
- Protect client from harassment or intimidation
- Monitor the scope and duration of the examination
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to attend an EUO if I disagree with the insurance company’s basis for requesting it?
Generally, yes. The recent court decisions make clear that insurance companies don’t need to prove objective reasons for requesting an EUO. However, timing and proper notice requirements still apply. Your attorney can help determine if the EUO request is valid.
Can I refuse to answer certain questions during an EUO?
Your attorney can object to improper questions, but you generally cannot refuse to answer relevant questions about your accident, injuries, and damages. However, questions must be within reasonable scope and properly worded.
What happens if the insurance company schedules the EUO more than 30 days after receiving my claim?
Based on recent case law, EUO requests made more than 30 days after receiving your claim may be invalid. This timing rule can provide important protection, so document when your claim was submitted and when the EUO was scheduled.
How long can an EUO last?
There’s no specific time limit, but EUOs should be reasonable in duration. Your attorney can help ensure the examination doesn’t become unnecessarily burdensome or harassing.
Can the insurance company request multiple EUOs?
While possible in certain circumstances, multiple EUOs are generally not favored by the courts unless there are substantial new developments in your case or significant time has passed.
Conclusion
Understanding EUO requirements is crucial for anyone involved in a New York personal injury case. While recent court decisions have made it easier for insurance companies to request these examinations, important protections still exist, particularly regarding timing requirements and proper procedures.
The key to successfully navigating an EUO is preparation, honesty, and experienced legal representation. Whether you’re dealing with a slip and fall injury, car accident, or other personal injury matter, understanding your rights and obligations regarding EUOs can help protect your claim and ensure you receive the benefits you deserve.
If you’ve been injured and are facing an EUO request from an insurance company, don’t face this challenge alone. The examination can significantly impact your case, and proper preparation is essential. Call 516-750-0595 for a free consultation with experienced personal injury attorneys who understand EUO procedures and will ensure your rights are protected throughout the process.
Related Articles
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.
Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.
Keep Reading
More EUO issues Analysis
EUO No-Show: Attorney Affirmation Sufficient Despite Time Lapse Between No-Shows and Execution
Appellate Term reverses Civil Court, holding that an attorney's affirmation attesting to plaintiff's failure to appear at EUOs was sufficient despite a 'significant lapse in time.'...
Feb 25, 2026EUO no-show – correct statement of law
Court ruling clarifies that insurers cannot enforce EUO requests sent more than 30 days after receiving claims, making late requests nullities under New York no-fault law.
May 22, 2021Certified Mail and Regular Mail
New York court clarifies that EUO scheduling letters sent by regular mail are sufficient - certified mail is not required for valid examination under oath notices.
Jul 24, 2019EUO no-show substantiated again
Court reinforces proper procedures for proving EUO no-shows in no-fault insurance cases, citing established precedent on certified transcripts and mailing requirements.
Sep 29, 2016EUO denial not vague or conclusory for not stating dates
Court rules EUO denial valid despite not specifying examination dates, rejecting plaintiff's argument that omission made denial vague or conclusory under New York no-fault law.
Apr 7, 2015Open claim avoids repudiation defense to DJ
New York court rules that open pre-IME claims prevent insured from using repudiation defense when failing to appear for EUO after negative medical exam.
Jun 25, 2013Was this article helpful?
About the Author
Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a euo issues matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.