Skip to main content
Understanding Examination Under Oath (EUO) Requirements in New York Personal Injury Cases
EUO issues

Understanding Examination Under Oath (EUO) Requirements in New York Personal Injury Cases

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Learn about Examination Under Oath (EUO) requirements in NY personal injury cases. Expert legal guidance on EUO procedures. Call 516-750-0595.

This article is part of our ongoing euo issues coverage, with 197 published articles analyzing euo issues issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

Examination Under Oath (EUO) requirements represent one of the most challenging aspects of personal injury insurance claims in New York. Recent Appellate Term decisions provide crucial guidance on when insurance companies can demand these examinations and what standards they must meet. Understanding these requirements can mean the difference between receiving your rightful benefits and having your claim denied.

Recent EUO Case Law: What the Courts Are Saying

The “No Objective Basis Required” Standard

Several recent Appellate Term decisions have established a clear standard that favors insurance companies in EUO disputes:

In LMS Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Automotive Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50696(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019), the court held: “Furthermore, defendant was not required to set forth objective reasons for requesting the EUOs in order to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.”

This decision was echoed in Bronx Chiropractic Care, P.C. v State Farm Ins., 2019 NY Slip Op 50700(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019): “Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, defendant was not required to set forth objective reasons for requesting EUOs in order to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.”

The 30-Day Rule: Critical Timing Requirements

However, insurance companies are not given unlimited power. In K.O. Med., P.C. v IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50687(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019), the court provided important protection for claimants:

“Plaintiff correctly argues that the initial EUO scheduling letter sent to plaintiff had been sent more than 30 days after defendant had received the claims seeking $348.80, $204.41, $148.69, and $91.42. As a result, the request was a nullity as to those claims.”

What is an Examination Under Oath?

Definition and Purpose

An Examination Under Oath (EUO) is a formal procedure where an insurance company requires a claimant to answer questions under oath about their accident, injuries, and treatment. This examination is conducted outside of court, typically in a law office, with a court reporter present to record testimony.

When Insurance Companies Request EUOs

Insurance companies typically request EUOs in personal injury cases when they:

  • Suspect potential fraud or misrepresentation
  • Need additional information about the accident circumstances
  • Want to clarify medical treatment details
  • Seek to establish the extent of injuries and damages
  • Require documentation of claimed losses

Your Rights During an EUO

As a personal injury victim, you have specific rights during an EUO:

  1. Right to Legal Representation: You can have your attorney present during the examination
  2. Right to Object: Your lawyer can object to improper questions
  3. Right to Clarity: Questions must be clear and relevant to your claim
  4. Right to Take Breaks: Reasonable breaks should be allowed during lengthy examinations
  5. Right to Review: You can review and correct the transcript if necessary

The Impact on Personal Injury Cases

No-Fault Insurance Claims

In New York’s no-fault insurance system, EUOs are commonly requested for car accident cases involving:

Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Benefits:

  • Medical expense reimbursement
  • Lost wage compensation
  • Essential services benefits
  • Transportation to medical appointments

Common EUO Topics in No-Fault Cases:

  • Details of the accident
  • Pre-existing medical conditions
  • Current treatment and providers
  • Work history and income verification
  • Daily activities and limitations

Third-Party Liability Claims

For motor vehicle accident third-party claims, EUOs may cover:

  • Circumstances surrounding the accident
  • Liability determinations
  • Extent of property damage
  • Medical treatment and expenses
  • Lost wages and future earning capacity

Strategic Considerations for Personal Injury Victims

Timing Issues: The 30-Day Window

One of the most crucial aspects of EUO law is the timing requirement. Insurance companies generally have 30 days from receiving a claim to schedule an EUO. If they fail to meet this deadline, the EUO request may be invalid, as demonstrated in the K.O. Med case.

Key Timing Points:

  • 30-day deadline starts when the insurer receives the claim
  • Delay letters do not toll this period
  • Late EUO requests may be deemed nullities
  • Proper notice requirements must be met

What Happens if You Don’t Attend

Failing to appear for a properly scheduled EUO can have serious consequences:

In BC Chiropractic, P.C. v Farmers New Century Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50680(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2019), the court noted that when “plaintiff’s assignor had failed to appear on either date” for scheduled EUOs, the insurer could “timely deny” the claim on that ground.

Consequences of Non-Appearance:

  • Claim denial
  • Loss of benefits
  • Potential forfeiture of coverage
  • Difficulty in future negotiations

Preparation Strategies for EUOs

Document Review

Before your EUO, thoroughly review:

  1. Accident Documentation: Police reports, photos, witness statements
  2. Medical Records: All treatment records, diagnostic tests, surgical reports
  3. Financial Documents: Pay stubs, tax returns, business records
  4. Insurance Policies: Coverage limits, deductibles, exclusions
  5. Prior Claims History: Any previous insurance claims or lawsuits

Working with Your Attorney

Your personal injury attorney plays a crucial role in EUO preparation:

Pre-EUO Preparation:

  • Review potential questions and appropriate answers
  • Identify areas of vulnerability or concern
  • Prepare supporting documentation
  • Discuss strategies for handling difficult questions

During the EUO:

  • Object to improper or irrelevant questions
  • Ensure questions are clear and understandable
  • Protect client from harassment or intimidation
  • Monitor the scope and duration of the examination

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to attend an EUO if I disagree with the insurance company’s basis for requesting it?

Generally, yes. The recent court decisions make clear that insurance companies don’t need to prove objective reasons for requesting an EUO. However, timing and proper notice requirements still apply. Your attorney can help determine if the EUO request is valid.

Can I refuse to answer certain questions during an EUO?

Your attorney can object to improper questions, but you generally cannot refuse to answer relevant questions about your accident, injuries, and damages. However, questions must be within reasonable scope and properly worded.

What happens if the insurance company schedules the EUO more than 30 days after receiving my claim?

Based on recent case law, EUO requests made more than 30 days after receiving your claim may be invalid. This timing rule can provide important protection, so document when your claim was submitted and when the EUO was scheduled.

How long can an EUO last?

There’s no specific time limit, but EUOs should be reasonable in duration. Your attorney can help ensure the examination doesn’t become unnecessarily burdensome or harassing.

Can the insurance company request multiple EUOs?

While possible in certain circumstances, multiple EUOs are generally not favored by the courts unless there are substantial new developments in your case or significant time has passed.

Conclusion

Understanding EUO requirements is crucial for anyone involved in a New York personal injury case. While recent court decisions have made it easier for insurance companies to request these examinations, important protections still exist, particularly regarding timing requirements and proper procedures.

The key to successfully navigating an EUO is preparation, honesty, and experienced legal representation. Whether you’re dealing with a slip and fall injury, car accident, or other personal injury matter, understanding your rights and obligations regarding EUOs can help protect your claim and ensure you receive the benefits you deserve.

If you’ve been injured and are facing an EUO request from an insurance company, don’t face this challenge alone. The examination can significantly impact your case, and proper preparation is essential. Call 516-750-0595 for a free consultation with experienced personal injury attorneys who understand EUO procedures and will ensure your rights are protected throughout the process.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

Keep Reading

More EUO issues Analysis

View all EUO issues articles

Was this article helpful?

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.

24+ years in practice 1,000+ appeals written 100K+ no-fault cases $100M+ recovered

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a euo issues matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Filed under: EUO issues
Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Discussion

Comments (1)

Archived from the original blog discussion.

R
Rookie
These decisions about the objective reason are wrong. Rega clearly state need Good Cause 65-3.2 and need objective reason 65-3.5. The way the decisions read is that if the carrier believes the siu investigator has blue balls than they can request the provider euo. There has to be an OBJECTIVE reason test for each euo otherwise its free for all. Appellate term caved to the carriers on this issue

Legal Resources

Understanding New York EUO issues Law

New York has a unique legal landscape that affects how euo issues cases are litigated and resolved. The state's court system includes the Civil Court (for claims up to $25,000), the Supreme Court (the primary trial court for unlimited jurisdiction), the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts), the Appellate Division (divided into four Departments, with the Second Department covering Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and several upstate counties), and the Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). Each court has its own procedural requirements, local rules, and case-assignment practices that can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

For euo issues matters on Long Island, cases are typically filed in Nassau County Supreme Court (at the courthouse in Mineola) or Suffolk County Supreme Court (in Riverhead). No-fault arbitrations are heard through the American Arbitration Association, which assigns arbitrators throughout the metropolitan area. Workers' compensation claims go to the Workers' Compensation Board, with hearings at district offices across the state. Understanding which forum is appropriate for your case — and the specific procedural rules that apply — is essential for a successful outcome.

The procedural landscape in New York also includes important timing requirements that can affect your case. Most civil actions are subject to statutes of limitations ranging from one year (for intentional torts and claims against municipalities) to six years (for contract actions). Personal injury cases generally have a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5), while medical malpractice claims must be filed within two and a half years under CPLR 214-a. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including 30-day filing requirements for applications and 45-day deadlines for provider claims. Understanding and complying with these deadlines is critical — missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case may be on the merits.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum regularly practices in all of these venues. His office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, NY 11746, is centrally located on Long Island, providing convenient access to courts and offices throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City. Whether you need representation in a no-fault arbitration, a personal injury trial, an employment discrimination hearing, or an appeal to the Appellate Division, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. brings $24+ years of real courtroom experience to your case. If you have questions about the legal issues discussed in this article, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, no-obligation consultation.

New York's substantive law also presents distinct challenges. In motor vehicle cases, the no-fault system under Insurance Law Article 51 provides first-party benefits regardless of fault, but limits the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the plaintiff establishes a "serious injury" under one of nine statutory categories. This threshold — codified at Insurance Law Section 5102(d) — requires medical evidence showing more than a minor or subjective injury, and courts have developed detailed standards for each category. Fractures must be documented through imaging studies. Claims of permanent consequential limitation or significant limitation of use require quantified range-of-motion testing with comparison to norms. The 90/180-day category demands proof that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident.

In employment discrimination cases, the legal standards vary depending on whether the claim arises under state or local law. The New York State Human Rights Law employs a burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by showing membership in a protected class, qualification for the position, an adverse employment action, and circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision. If the employer meets this burden, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the stated reason is pretextual. The New York City Human Rights Law, by contrast, applies a broader standard, asking whether the plaintiff was treated less well than other employees because of a protected characteristic.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review