Key Takeaway
Expert analysis of NY acupuncture billing codes & no-fault insurance disputes. Learn your rights when insurance denies treatment. Call 516-750-0595 for help.
This article is part of our ongoing fee schedule coverage, with 388 published articles analyzing fee schedule issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Understanding Basic Acupuncture Codes in New York No-Fault Insurance Claims
In the complex world of New York’s no-fault insurance system, medical providers and patients frequently encounter disputes over billing codes and payment schedules. A recent Appellate Term decision provides crucial insight into how acupuncture services are properly coded and compensated under workers’ compensation fee schedules. The case Healing Art Acupuncture, P.C. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 50574(U)(App. Term 2d Dept 2019) demonstrates the importance of proper documentation and expert testimony in fee schedule disputes.
The Foundation of Acupuncture Coding in New York
New York’s no-fault insurance system requires that acupuncture services be billed according to specific coding standards and fee schedules. When acupuncture services are performed by licensed acupuncturists, insurance companies may apply the workers’ compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors to determine appropriate payment amounts. This practice has been consistently upheld by New York courts.
The Healing Art Acupuncture case specifically addressed CPT codes 97810 and 97811, which are commonly used for acupuncture services. These codes represent:
- CPT Code 97810: Acupuncture, one or more needles, without electrical stimulation, initial 15 minutes of personal one-on-one contact with the patient
- CPT Code 97811: Acupuncture, one or more needles, without electrical stimulation, each additional 15 minutes of personal one-on-one contact with the patient
The Role of Medical Coders in Insurance Disputes
One of the most significant aspects of the Healing Art Acupuncture decision was the court’s acceptance of testimony from a certified medical coder. The court noted that “the parties stipulated that defendant’s witness was a certified medical coder” and that this witness had properly applied the workers’ compensation chiropractic fee schedule to determine payment for services provided by a licensed acupuncturist.
This establishes an important precedent for medical malpractice cases and insurance disputes throughout New York. When insurance companies deny or underpay claims, having expert testimony from certified medical coders can be crucial to establishing proper payment amounts.
Understanding the RVU Calculation Process
The court’s decision highlights what it called “the ministerial act of multiplying the ‘RVU’ with the ‘Region IV conversion factor.’” This refers to the standard methodology used in medical billing:
- Relative Value Units (RVUs): A measure of value used in the Medicare physician fee schedule to determine appropriate payment
- Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCI): Regional adjustments to account for differences in practice costs
- Conversion Factor: A dollar amount used to convert RVUs into payment amounts
Implications for Personal Injury and No-Fault Claims
This decision has significant implications for patients seeking treatment after personal injury accidents on Long Island and throughout New York. When acupuncture is prescribed as part of a treatment plan following a car accident, slip and fall, or other personal injury incident, proper coding and billing become crucial to ensuring adequate coverage.
Common Acupuncture Coding Issues
Healthcare providers and patients frequently encounter several coding-related challenges:
- Insurance companies improperly denying coverage for legitimate acupuncture services
- Disputes over the appropriate fee schedule to apply
- Questions about the medical necessity of extended treatment sessions
- Documentation requirements for proving the effectiveness of treatment
For patients receiving acupuncture treatment after accidents covered by no-fault insurance, understanding these coding requirements can be essential to avoiding treatment interruptions or unexpected medical bills.
Legal Standards for Fee Schedule Applications
The Healing Art Acupuncture decision builds upon earlier precedent, particularly the case of Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co., which held “as a matter of law, that an insurer may use the workers’ compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors to determine the amount which a licensed acupuncturist is entitled to receive for such acupuncture services.”
This legal standard provides clarity for both healthcare providers and insurance companies, but disputes still arise when:
- Providers fail to submit adequate documentation supporting their claims
- Insurance companies misapply fee schedules or conversion factors
- There are disagreements about the appropriate coding for specific procedures
The Burden of Proof in Coding Disputes
When insurance companies challenge acupuncture billing, the burden typically falls on the healthcare provider to demonstrate that their coding and billing practices are appropriate. This often requires:
- Detailed treatment records showing the nature and duration of services provided
- Proper documentation of patient diagnoses and treatment plans
- Evidence that services were medically necessary and appropriate
- Expert testimony regarding proper coding practices when disputes arise
Protecting Your Rights in Medical Billing Disputes
If you’re a patient who has received acupuncture treatment following a personal injury accident and are facing billing disputes or insurance denials, it’s important to understand your rights. New York’s no-fault insurance system is designed to provide prompt payment for necessary medical treatment, but navigating complex coding requirements can be challenging.
Steps to Take When Facing Billing Issues
When insurance companies deny or underpay acupuncture claims, consider taking the following steps:
- Review all medical records: Ensure that your healthcare provider has properly documented all services provided
- Verify coding accuracy: Confirm that the correct CPT codes have been used for your treatment
- Request detailed explanations: Ask your insurance company to provide specific reasons for any claim denials
- Gather supporting documentation: Collect all relevant medical records, treatment notes, and correspondence
- Consider expert consultation: In complex cases, medical coding experts may be needed to resolve disputes
The Future of Acupuncture Coding in New York
As alternative medical treatments like acupuncture become increasingly integrated into comprehensive treatment plans for accident victims, the importance of proper coding and billing practices will continue to grow. Healthcare providers must stay current with evolving coding standards and fee schedules, while patients need to understand their rights and options when disputes arise.
The Healing Art Acupuncture decision provides important clarity for how these disputes should be resolved, emphasizing the importance of expert testimony and proper application of established fee schedules. This precedent will likely influence similar cases throughout New York’s court system.
Frequently Asked Questions About Acupuncture Coding
Q: What happens if my acupuncture treatment is denied by no-fault insurance?
A: If your no-fault insurance company denies coverage for acupuncture treatment, you have the right to appeal the decision. This may involve providing additional medical documentation, obtaining expert opinions on the medical necessity of treatment, or challenging the insurance company’s application of fee schedules and coding requirements.
Q: Can insurance companies use different fee schedules for acupuncture services?
A: According to New York court decisions, insurance companies may use the workers’ compensation fee schedule for acupuncture services performed by chiropractors when determining payment amounts for licensed acupuncturists. However, they must apply these schedules correctly and consistently.
Q: How important is proper documentation for acupuncture billing?
A: Proper documentation is crucial for successful acupuncture billing. Healthcare providers must maintain detailed records of all services provided, including treatment duration, techniques used, and patient response to treatment. This documentation supports proper coding and helps resolve any billing disputes that may arise.
Q: What role do certified medical coders play in insurance disputes?
A: Certified medical coders can provide expert testimony regarding proper coding practices and fee schedule applications. Their expertise can be invaluable in resolving disputes between healthcare providers and insurance companies over appropriate payment amounts.
Q: Are there time limits for appealing insurance denials of acupuncture treatment?
A: Yes, New York law establishes specific time limits for appealing insurance claim denials. It’s important to act promptly when facing billing disputes to preserve your rights and ensure that appeals are filed within required deadlines.
If you’re facing challenges with acupuncture billing or other medical treatment coverage following an accident, don’t let insurance companies deny you the care you need. Call 516-750-0595 for a free consultation with experienced legal professionals who understand New York’s complex no-fault insurance system and can help protect your rights to proper medical care and compensation.
Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2019 post, New York’s no-fault insurance regulations and fee schedules for acupuncture services may have been amended through regulatory updates or legislative changes. The workers’ compensation fee schedule referenced for acupuncture reimbursement rates has likely been updated multiple times, potentially affecting billing amounts and procedural requirements. Practitioners should verify current fee schedules and coding requirements with the New York State Insurance Department and relevant regulatory authorities before relying on the specific provisions discussed in this post.
Related Articles
Legal Context
Why This Matters for Your Case
New York's no-fault insurance system, established under Insurance Law Article 51, is one of the most complex insurance frameworks in the country. Every motorist must carry Personal Injury Protection coverage that pays medical expenses and lost wages regardless of fault, up to $50,000 per person.
But insurers routinely deny valid claims using peer reviews, EUO scheduling tactics, fee schedule reductions, and coverage defenses. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has handled over 100,000 no-fault cases since 2002 — from initial claim submissions through arbitration before the American Arbitration Association, trials in Civil Court and Supreme Court, and appeals to the Appellate Term and Appellate Division. Jason Tenenbaum is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
His 2,353+ published legal articles on no-fault practice are cited by attorneys throughout New York. Whether you are dealing with a medical necessity denial, an EUO no-show defense, a fee schedule dispute, or a coverage question, this article provides the kind of detailed case-law analysis that helps practitioners and claimants understand exactly where the law stands.
About This Topic
Fee Schedule Issues in No-Fault Insurance
The New York no-fault fee schedule establishes the maximum reimbursement rates for medical treatment provided to injured motorists. Disputes over fee schedule calculations, coding, usual and customary charges, and the applicability of workers compensation fee schedules to no-fault claims are common. These articles analyze fee schedule regulations, court decisions on reimbursement disputes, and the practical challenges providers face in obtaining appropriate payment under the no-fault system.
388 published articles in Fee Schedule
Keep Reading
More Fee Schedule Analysis
Priority of Payment Regulation Has No Force in Arbitration: First and Second Departments Agree
Both the First and Second Departments have held that the priority of payment regulation under 11 NYCRR 65-3.15 is of no force or effect in no-fault arbitration proceedings....
Feb 25, 2026How Insurance Companies Use Colossus Software to Undervalue Your Injury Claim
Insurance companies use Colossus software to lowball your injury claim. Learn how this system works and how a Long Island attorney can fight back. Call 516-750-0595.
Feb 18, 2026“Equitable estoppel” – Domotor light
Florida court affirms equitable estoppel doctrine when insurer wrongly denied PIP coverage then changed tactics after discovering their error in no-fault case.
Jun 22, 2021Party does not have a basis to use CPLR 321(c) as a sword against now unrepresented party
Court rules CPLR 321(c) cannot be used as sword against unrepresented party after stipulation settlement - protection for deprived counsel only.
Jun 10, 2017I wonder which plaintiff no-fault firm wrote this and had this State Senator introduce it…
Analysis of proposed New York no-fault insurance law changes affecting examination under oath procedures and claimant rights in 2012.
Jun 21, 2012Long Island Motorcycle Accidents: What You Need to Know
Learn about motorcycle accident claims, personal injury coverage, and no-fault insurance. Expert guide for riders seeking compensation.
Jan 15, 2025Was this article helpful?
About the Author
Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.
Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.
Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.
New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.
If you need legal help with a fee schedule matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.