Junk science?
Court case analyzing biomechanical expert testimony and causation standards in New York personal injury law, focusing on delta-v calculations and serious injury thresholds.
Junk science? — Read More →22 articles published in December 2018
The articles below were published in December 2018 by Attorney Jason Tenenbaum and the legal team at his Long Island law office. Each article provides detailed analysis of real court decisions, statutory developments, and procedural issues in New York personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment law.
Attorney Tenenbaum has maintained this legal blog since 2008, creating one of the most comprehensive public archives of New York insurance and personal injury case law analysis available online. Every article draws on his firsthand experience litigating cases in Nassau County District Court, Suffolk County courts, New York City Civil Court, and the Appellate Term. Unlike generic legal content, these articles cite specific case holdings, analyze judicial reasoning, and identify practical takeaways for attorneys and claimants navigating New York's complex legal landscape.
Whether you are an attorney researching a procedural question, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your legal rights after an accident or workplace dispute, this archive offers substantive legal analysis grounded in real New York courtroom experience. For case-specific legal advice, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.
Court case analyzing biomechanical expert testimony and causation standards in New York personal injury law, focusing on delta-v calculations and serious injury thresholds.
Junk science? — Read More →Expert guide to NY no-fault arbitration priority payment disputes and award challenges. CPLR 7511 guidance. Long Island attorneys. Call 516-750-0595.
NY No-Fault Arbitration: Understanding Priority of Payment and Award Challenges — Read More →Learn when you can recover economic losses over $50K without proving serious injury under NY law. Expert Long Island attorneys. Call 516-750-0595 free consult.
NY Economic Loss Recovery: When Serious Injury Threshold Not Required — Read More →Understand NY no-fault insurance occupying vehicle coverage disputes. Expert Long Island attorneys help with GEICO coverage denials. Call 516-750-0595 free consult.
Understanding Vehicle “Occupying” Coverage Under NY No-Fault Law — Read More →Insurance companies use delay tactics to avoid paying no-fault claims. Learn how courts combat these strategies and protect your rights. Call 516-750-0595 for help.
Combating Litigation Delay Tactics in New York No-Fault Insurance Cases — Read More →New DFS insurance regulations typically apply prospectively, not retroactively. Learn your rights when insurance companies change claim rules mid-process. Call 516-750-0595
Understanding Retroactive Application of New York Insurance Regulations — Read More →Insurance companies use verification requests to delay no-fault benefits. Learn your rights regarding verification mailing, responses & dispute tactics. Call 516-750-0595
Understanding Verification Requests in New York No-Fault Insurance Claims — Read More →Insurance companies reduce medical bills through down-coding. Learn your rights when CPT codes are changed and how to challenge improper billing decisions. Call 516-750-0595
Understanding Medical Billing and Down-Coding in New York No-Fault Insurance Claims — Read More →Insurance companies try technical defenses to deny NY no-fault benefits. Learn how business records rule & choice of law protects your claim. Call 516-750-0595
Understanding New York No-Fault Insurance Claims and the Business Records Rule — Read More →New York court clarifies post-judgment interest calculation at 9% per year in no-fault insurance cases, distinguishing between statutory rates and payment procedures.
Post judgment interest at 9%? — Read More →Court wrongly precluded expert witnesses despite no prejudice, emphasizing case timeline over proper CPLR 4404 analysis in no-fault insurance dispute.
“We have to move these cases timely.” — Read More →NY court rulings on no-fault insurance policy exhaustion defenses, including when insurers can claim coverage limits reached after denying claims improperly.
Policy exhaustion? — Read More →New York appellate court rules that clerical error alone cannot justify sending no-fault forms to wrong insurer, emphasizing strict compliance with 45-day claim requirements.
Reasonable excuse? — Read More →New York court ruling on EUO timing requirements and toll provisions for no-fault insurance claims, addressing when scheduling letters affect subsequent bills.
Provider EUO letter – serve to delay the bills — Read More →Court rules insurance companies don't need objective reasons to request EUOs, only proper notice and proof of non-appearance for claim denial.
Objective basis? — Read More →Court rules EUO request sent over 30 days after claim receipt is invalid, reinforcing strict timing requirements in New York no-fault insurance cases.
Timely EUO denial — Read More →NY court denies severance motion in no-fault insurance case involving separate accidents, citing lack of prejudice to substantial rights under CPLR 603.
Severance denied — Read More →New York court confirms that insurance companies can defeat no-fault claims by proving no policy existed at the time of accident through proper affidavit evidence.
No policy, no coverage — Read More →First Department applies stringent default vacatur standard in Tri-State v Hereford, requiring reasonable excuse and meritorious defense despite public policy favoring merits.
First Department applying a stringent default vacatur standard — Read More →Court of Appeals clarifies when defendants can raise new factual arguments on appeal, highlighting the strategic importance of reply briefs in motion practice.
The role of reply — Read More →Court distinguishes between Mallela defense and over-billing claims in no-fault insurance case, ruling that billing fraud doesn't qualify for extended defense timeline.
Mallela – or was it? — Read More →Comparison of 'serious injury' definitions between New York Penal Law 10.00(10) and Insurance Law 5102(d) in People v Garland, examining evidentiary standards.
Serious injury: PL 10.00(10) v. Ins Law 5102(d) — Read More →The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum publishes legal analysis on a regular basis covering developments in New York personal injury litigation, no-fault insurance disputes, employment discrimination, and related practice areas. Attorney Tenenbaum started writing about New York case law in 2008, and the blog has grown into a library of over 2,353 articles analyzing court decisions from the Appellate Term, Appellate Division, and Court of Appeals.
Topics frequently covered include the prima facie case standard in no-fault actions, the 30-day preclusion rule under Insurance Regulation 192, IME and EUO no-show defenses, summary judgment practice under CPLR 3212, default judgment standards, verification and claims submission procedures, and the serious injury threshold under Insurance Law Section 5102(d). Employment law articles address wrongful termination, workplace discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, wage and hour violations, and employer retaliation claims.
Each article is written for a professional audience but remains accessible to non-lawyers seeking to understand how New York courts handle specific legal issues. The firm serves clients across Long Island, including Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. If you have a legal question about any topic covered in these articles, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, confidential consultation.
New York's civil court system is one of the most complex in the nation, with multiple overlapping jurisdictions that affect how personal injury, no-fault insurance, and employment cases are litigated. The New York City Civil Court handles claims up to $25,000 in the five boroughs, while the District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk Counties handle similar matters on Long Island. For claims exceeding $25,000, the Supreme Court serves as the primary trial court with unlimited monetary jurisdiction. Despite its name, the Supreme Court is not the highest court in New York — that distinction belongs to the Court of Appeals, which sits in Albany and decides approximately 200 cases per year.
Appeals from Civil Court and District Court decisions go to the Appellate Term, which is divided into departments corresponding to the Appellate Division. The Appellate Term for the Second Department — which covers Nassau County, Suffolk County, Kings County (Brooklyn), Queens County, and Richmond County (Staten Island) — hears hundreds of no-fault insurance appeals each year and has developed a substantial body of case law on topics including timely denial, verification procedures, proof of mailing, fee schedule disputes, and medical necessity standards. The Appellate Division, Second Department, hears appeals from Supreme Court and from the Appellate Term, and its decisions are binding on all lower courts within its jurisdiction.
Understanding where your case falls within this system is critical. A no-fault insurance dispute involving a $3,000 medical bill will follow a very different procedural path than a $500,000 personal injury claim arising from the same automobile accident. The former is typically resolved through mandatory arbitration before the American Arbitration Association under Insurance Department Regulation 68, while the latter proceeds through Supreme Court with full discovery, independent medical examinations under CPLR 3121, depositions, and potentially a jury trial. Attorney Tenenbaum has practiced extensively in all of these venues and understands the strategic considerations unique to each.
Several statutes and regulations appear frequently in the articles archived on this page. Insurance Law Article 51 establishes New York's no-fault insurance framework, requiring every motor vehicle policy to include personal injury protection benefits covering medical expenses, lost earnings (up to $2,000 per month), and other basic economic loss up to $50,000 per person. 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 (Insurance Regulation 192) imposes a 30-day deadline on insurers to pay or deny no-fault claims after receiving proof of claim and all demanded verification, and the failure to timely deny results in preclusion of most coverage defenses.
In personal injury litigation, Insurance Law Section 5102(d) defines the categories of "serious injury" that a plaintiff must establish before recovering non-economic damages in a motor vehicle accident case. The nine categories — death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, fracture, loss of a fetus, permanent loss of use, permanent consequential limitation, significant limitation of use, and the 90/180-day category — each have specific evidentiary requirements that have been refined through decades of appellate decisions. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum has litigated serious injury threshold motions in hundreds of cases and regularly writes about new developments in this area.
Employment claims in New York implicate both state and federal statutes. The New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law Section 296) prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, military status, sex, disability, predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status, marital status, and domestic violence victim status. The New York City Human Rights Law provides even broader protections and applies a more liberal standard. At the federal level, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act provide additional protections but are subject to administrative exhaustion requirements through the EEOC.
Workers' compensation cases in New York are governed by the Workers' Compensation Law and administered by the Workers' Compensation Board. Injured workers are entitled to medical treatment, lost wage benefits (typically two-thirds of the average weekly wage, subject to a statutory maximum), and permanency awards for lasting disabilities. Third-party claims — such as personal injury lawsuits against property owners or general contractors under Labor Law Sections 200, 240, and 241 — often run parallel to workers' compensation proceedings and involve complex lien and subrogation issues that require experienced legal counsel to navigate properly.
The articles in this archive analyze real decisions from courts across New York State, with a particular focus on the Appellate Term and Appellate Division decisions that establish binding precedent for trial courts on Long Island and in New York City. Whether you are an attorney preparing a motion, an insurance professional evaluating a claim, or an individual trying to understand your rights, these articles provide the detailed legal analysis that generic legal websites simply cannot offer. For personalized advice about your specific situation, contact the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum at (516) 750-0595.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. serves clients from its office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. The firm represents individuals and businesses throughout Long Island — including the towns of Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton, Huntington, and Oyster Bay in Suffolk County, and the cities and villages of Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa, and Levittown in Nassau County. The firm also handles cases in all five boroughs of New York City: Queens, Brooklyn (Kings County), Manhattan (New York County), the Bronx, and Staten Island (Richmond County). Court appearances are regularly made at Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola, Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, the Nassau County District Court, the Suffolk County District Court, and the New York City Civil Court throughout the five boroughs.
Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.