Workers Compensation from the First Department
First Department case on workers compensation defense in no-fault actions - when summary judgment motions should be held pending Workers Compensation Board determination.
Read More →13 articles published in September 2017
First Department case on workers compensation defense in no-fault actions - when summary judgment motions should be held pending Workers Compensation Board determination.
Read More →New York appeals court ruling on workers compensation triable issues in no-fault insurance cases, examining employee status determination requirements.
Read More →Court rejects insurer's "out of scope" defense for CPT code 97039, finding triable issues regarding proper denial of no-fault acupuncture claim.
Read More →NY court confirms acupuncturists are limited to chiropractor fee schedule rates regardless of prior payments at higher medical doctor rates in no-fault insurance claims.
Read More →Court upholds insurer's application of workers' compensation fee schedule to CPT code 20553, highlighting ongoing disputes over proper billing methodologies in no-fault cases.
Read More →Court rules plaintiff must comply with discovery demands after failing to timely object, absent showing information sought is palpably improper or privileged.
Read More →Court finds insufficient proof of IME mailing in no-fault case, highlighting importance of proper documentation when claiming patient no-show for scheduled examinations.
Read More →Defense attorney's nightmare: $200,000 jury verdict for bulge disc under NY no-fault law's significant limitation and permanent consequential limitation prongs.
Read More →NY Court clarifies that CPLR 3212(a)'s 120-day rule for summary judgment motions runs from service date, not filing date, ending confusion among practitioners.
Read More →Learn whether post-judgment interest in New York no-fault cases is calculated at 24% annually (CPLR 5004) or 9% annually, based on recent appellate decisions.
Read More →Court rules Mallela defense doesn't require timely denial preservation in no-fault insurance cases, contrary to plaintiff's argument in K.O. Med v USAA.
Read More →Court ruling affirms discretion to consider late opposition papers in insurance cases when no prejudice exists, challenging rigid adherence to Civil King stipulations.
Read More →Court rules that detailed affidavit describing insurance record search was sufficient to prove no coverage existed on accident date, shifting burden back to plaintiff.
Read More →Injured? Don't Wait.
Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today
No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.