Skip to main content
Motion Return Date Adjournments in New York Courts – Expert Legal Guidance
Adjournments

Motion Return Date Adjournments in New York Courts – Expert Legal Guidance

By Jason Tenenbaum 8 min read

Key Takeaway

Learn when New York courts will grant motion adjournments and the consequences of appearing unprepared. Expert legal guidance for Nassau & Suffolk County cases.

This article is part of our ongoing adjournments coverage, with 97 published articles analyzing adjournments issues across New York State. Attorney Jason Tenenbaum brings 24+ years of hands-on experience to this analysis, drawing from his work on more than 1,000 appeals, over 100,000 no-fault cases, and recovery of over $100 million for clients throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. For personalized legal advice about how these principles apply to your specific situation, contact our Long Island office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation.

Understanding Motion Return Dates and Adjournments in New York Civil Practice

In New York civil litigation, motion practice is governed by strict procedural rules that attorneys and litigants must follow. One critical aspect that often determines the success or failure of a motion is understanding when courts will—or will not—grant adjournments for unprepared parties. For attorneys practicing in Nassau County, Suffolk County, and throughout the New York City metropolitan area, these procedural requirements can make or break a case.

When appearing before judges in Nassau County Supreme Court, Queens County Supreme Court, or any of the other busy courtrooms throughout Long Island and NYC, preparation is not just advisable—it’s mandatory. The courts have consistently taken a firm stance against parties who appear unprepared on motion return dates, as demonstrated by recent appellate decisions.

The Fourth Department’s Strict Approach to Motion Return Dates

The Fourth Department, in Counsel Fin. Servs., LLC v David Mcquade Leibowitz, P.C., 2009 NY Slip Op 08663 (4th Dept. 2009), observed the following:

We note at the outset that the contentions of defendants are properly before us despite the fact that the order and judgment was entered upon their default. Although defendants did not move to vacate the order and judgment, they appeared in court on the adjourned return date of the motion and contested the entry of a default judgment (see Spano v Kline, 50 AD3d 1499, lv denied 11 NY3d 702, 12 NY3d 704; Jann v Cassidy, 265 AD2d 873, 874; Spatz v Bajramoski, 214 AD2d 436). Nevertheless, we conclude that the court properly granted the motion.”

“The record establishes that only plaintiff’s counsel appeared in court on the initial return date of the motion but that the court thereafter granted defendants additional time in which to submit papers in opposition to the motion and adjourned the matter to a date subsequent thereto. The court stated that, in the event that defendant failed to appear on the adjourned return date, “the matter will be deemed submitted.” Defendants failed to submit any opposing papers by the date specified by the court and, although defendant appeared in court on the adjourned return date, he requested a second adjournment at that time, in which to prepare opposing papers. The court determined that defendants already were in default at that time, inasmuch as they had failed to submit opposing papers.”

A few things are noteworthy here. First, it seems that Defendant should have probably moved on notice to vacate the default as opposed to attempting to vacate the default through appealing the order that resulted from the hearing. Second, it seems that the Fourth Department really has taken, at least in this case, a really tough line on parties who are not ready on motion return dates.

Implications for Long Island and NYC Practice

This decision has significant implications for attorneys practicing in Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens County, Kings County, Bronx County, New York County, Richmond County, and Westchester County. The courts throughout the New York metropolitan area have increasingly adopted a similar no-nonsense approach to motion practice, particularly in high-volume commercial and civil litigation matters.

In Nassau County Supreme Court, located in Mineola, and Suffolk County Supreme Court in Riverhead, attorneys routinely face packed calendars where judges must move efficiently through dozens of motions. Similarly, in the busy Manhattan Supreme Court at 60 Centre Street or the Queens Supreme Court in Jamaica, judges cannot afford to repeatedly adjourn matters for unprepared counsel.

The Consequences of Unpreparedness

When an attorney appears unprepared on a motion return date, several adverse consequences may follow:

  • Default judgment entry: As seen in the Counsel Financial Services case, courts may enter default judgments against unprepared parties
  • Waiver of opposition rights: Failure to submit timely opposition papers may result in waiver of the right to oppose the motion
  • Sanctions: Courts may impose monetary sanctions under CPLR 8303-a for frivolous conduct or dilatory tactics
  • Client relations damage: Unprepared appearances reflect poorly on counsel and may damage the attorney-client relationship

Best Practices for Motion Practice in New York

To avoid the pitfalls illustrated in the Fourth Department’s decision, attorneys should:

  • Calendar motion return dates immediately upon service
  • Prepare opposition or reply papers well in advance of deadlines
  • Communicate with opposing counsel regarding potential adjournments before the return date
  • If additional time is needed, move for an adjournment on notice rather than appearing unprepared
  • Maintain detailed case management systems to track all motion deadlines

Strategic Considerations for Different Case Types

The principles established in this decision apply across various practice areas common in Long Island and New York City litigation:

Personal Injury Cases

In personal injury matters, particularly those involving motor vehicle accidents on Long Island highways or NYC streets, motion practice often involves summary judgment motions, discovery disputes, and Daubert challenges. Unprepared appearances can result in adverse rulings that significantly impact case value and client recovery.

Commercial Litigation

Business disputes in Nassau and Suffolk counties, as well as throughout the five boroughs, frequently involve complex motion practice. Commercial Division rules impose even stricter requirements for motion practice, making preparation absolutely critical.

Real Estate Litigation

Given the high-value real estate markets in Long Island and NYC, real estate litigation often involves time-sensitive motion practice. Foreclosure proceedings, partition actions, and contract disputes require meticulous attention to procedural requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I request an adjournment on the return date if I’m not prepared?

A: While you can request an adjournment, courts are increasingly reluctant to grant them, especially if it’s not the first request. The safer approach is to move for an adjournment on notice before the return date, showing good cause for the delay.

Q: What happens if I fail to submit opposition papers by the deadline?

A: As demonstrated in the Counsel Financial Services case, failure to submit timely opposition papers may result in the court treating your position as a default, potentially leading to an adverse judgment even if you appear in court.

Q: How can I avoid these procedural pitfalls?

A: Implement robust case management systems, calendar all deadlines immediately, prepare papers well in advance, and maintain regular communication with opposing counsel and the court regarding scheduling issues.

Q: Is there any way to challenge a default judgment entered due to unpreparedness?

A: Yes, but it requires demonstrating excusable default and a meritorious defense. The better strategy is prevention through proper preparation and timely motion practice.

Q: Do these rules apply differently in different New York counties?

A: While local rules may vary slightly between courts, the fundamental requirement for preparedness and timely submission of papers is consistent throughout New York State courts, from Manhattan to Montauk.

The complexities of New York civil procedure require experienced legal counsel who understands both the substantive law and the critical procedural requirements that can make or break a case. Whether you’re facing a commercial dispute in Nassau County, a personal injury claim in Queens, or any other civil litigation matter throughout Long Island and the greater New York area, proper legal representation is essential.

Procedural missteps like those highlighted in the Counsel Financial Services decision can have devastating consequences for litigants. Don’t let poor preparation or missed deadlines jeopardize your legal rights and potential recovery.

If you need experienced legal representation for civil litigation matters in Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens County, or anywhere in the New York metropolitan area, call 516-750-0595 today. Our firm understands the intricacies of New York civil practice and will ensure your case receives the thorough preparation and attention it deserves.


Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2009 post, New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules may have been amended, particularly regarding motion practice procedures, electronic filing requirements, and court scheduling protocols. Additionally, local court rules in Nassau, Suffolk, and NYC counties may have evolved significantly, and case law interpreting CPLR provisions on adjournments and defaults has continued to develop. Practitioners should verify current CPLR provisions, local rules, and recent appellate decisions when advising clients on motion return date procedures.

Legal Context

Why This Matters for Your Case

New York law is among the most complex and nuanced in the country, with distinct procedural rules, substantive doctrines, and court systems that differ significantly from other jurisdictions. The Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) governs every stage of civil litigation, from service of process through trial and appeal. The Appellate Division, Appellate Term, and Court of Appeals create a rich and ever-evolving body of case law that practitioners must follow.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum has practiced across these areas for over 24 years, writing more than 1,000 appellate briefs and publishing over 2,353 legal articles that attorneys and clients rely on for guidance. The analysis in this article reflects real courtroom experience — from motion practice in Civil Court and Supreme Court to oral arguments before the Appellate Division — and a deep understanding of how New York courts actually apply the law in practice.

Was this article helpful?

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.

Jason Tenenbaum is the founding attorney of the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., headquartered at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, New York 11746. With over 24 years of experience since founding the firm in 2002, Jason has written more than 1,000 appeals, handled over 100,000 no-fault insurance cases, and recovered over $100 million for clients across Long Island, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island. He is one of the few attorneys in the state who both writes his own appellate briefs and tries his own cases.

Jason is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Georgia, and Michigan state courts, as well as multiple federal courts. His 2,353+ published legal articles analyzing New York case law, procedural developments, and litigation strategy make him one of the most prolific legal commentators in the state. He earned his Juris Doctor from Syracuse University College of Law.

24+ years in practice 1,000+ appeals written 100K+ no-fault cases $100M+ recovered

Disclaimer: This article is published by the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. The legal principles discussed may not apply to your specific situation, and the law may have changed since this article was last updated.

New York law varies by jurisdiction — court decisions in one Appellate Division department may not be followed in another, and local court rules in Nassau County Supreme Court differ from those in Suffolk County Supreme Court, Kings County Civil Court, or Queens County Supreme Court. The Appellate Division, Second Department (which covers Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, and Staten Island) and the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts) each have distinct procedural requirements and precedents that affect litigation strategy.

If you need legal help with a adjournments matter, contact our office at (516) 750-0595 for a free consultation. We serve clients throughout Long Island (Huntington, Babylon, Islip, Brookhaven, Smithtown, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton), Nassau County (Hempstead, Garden City, Mineola, Great Neck, Manhasset, Freeport, Long Beach, Rockville Centre, Valley Stream, Westbury, Hicksville, Massapequa), Suffolk County (Hauppauge, Deer Park, Bay Shore, Central Islip, Patchogue, Brentwood), Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Westchester County. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Jason Tenenbaum, Personal Injury Attorney serving Long Island, Nassau County and Suffolk County

About the Author

Jason Tenenbaum

Jason Tenenbaum is a personal injury attorney serving Long Island, Nassau & Suffolk Counties, and New York City. Admitted to practice in NY, NJ, FL, TX, GA, MI, and Federal courts, Jason is one of the few attorneys who writes his own appeals and tries his own cases. Since 2002, he has authored over 2,353 articles on no-fault insurance law, personal injury, and employment law — a resource other attorneys rely on to stay current on New York appellate decisions.

Education
Syracuse University College of Law
Experience
24+ Years
Articles
2,353+ Published
Licensed In
7 States + Federal

Legal Resources

Understanding New York Adjournments Law

New York has a unique legal landscape that affects how adjournments cases are litigated and resolved. The state's court system includes the Civil Court (for claims up to $25,000), the Supreme Court (the primary trial court for unlimited jurisdiction), the Appellate Term (which hears appeals from lower courts), the Appellate Division (divided into four Departments, with the Second Department covering Long Island, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, and several upstate counties), and the Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). Each court has its own procedural requirements, local rules, and case-assignment practices that can significantly impact the outcome of your case.

For adjournments matters on Long Island, cases are typically filed in Nassau County Supreme Court (at the courthouse in Mineola) or Suffolk County Supreme Court (in Riverhead). No-fault arbitrations are heard through the American Arbitration Association, which assigns arbitrators throughout the metropolitan area. Workers' compensation claims go to the Workers' Compensation Board, with hearings at district offices across the state. Understanding which forum is appropriate for your case — and the specific procedural rules that apply — is essential for a successful outcome.

The procedural landscape in New York also includes important timing requirements that can affect your case. Most civil actions are subject to statutes of limitations ranging from one year (for intentional torts and claims against municipalities) to six years (for contract actions). Personal injury cases generally have a three-year deadline under CPLR 214(5), while medical malpractice claims must be filed within two and a half years under CPLR 214-a. No-fault insurance claims have their own regulatory deadlines, including 30-day filing requirements for applications and 45-day deadlines for provider claims. Understanding and complying with these deadlines is critical — missing a filing deadline can permanently bar your claim, regardless of how strong your case may be on the merits.

Attorney Jason Tenenbaum regularly practices in all of these venues. His office at 326 Walt Whitman Road, Suite C, Huntington Station, NY 11746, is centrally located on Long Island, providing convenient access to courts and offices throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City. Whether you need representation in a no-fault arbitration, a personal injury trial, an employment discrimination hearing, or an appeal to the Appellate Division, the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. brings $24+ years of real courtroom experience to your case. If you have questions about the legal issues discussed in this article, call (516) 750-0595 for a free, no-obligation consultation.

New York's substantive law also presents distinct challenges. In motor vehicle cases, the no-fault system under Insurance Law Article 51 provides first-party benefits regardless of fault, but limits the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the plaintiff establishes a "serious injury" under one of nine statutory categories. This threshold — codified at Insurance Law Section 5102(d) — requires medical evidence showing more than a minor or subjective injury, and courts have developed detailed standards for each category. Fractures must be documented through imaging studies. Claims of permanent consequential limitation or significant limitation of use require quantified range-of-motion testing with comparison to norms. The 90/180-day category demands proof that the plaintiff was unable to perform substantially all of their usual daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days following the accident.

In employment discrimination cases, the legal standards vary depending on whether the claim arises under state or local law. The New York State Human Rights Law employs a burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by showing membership in a protected class, qualification for the position, an adverse employment action, and circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision. If the employer meets this burden, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the stated reason is pretextual. The New York City Human Rights Law, by contrast, applies a broader standard, asking whether the plaintiff was treated less well than other employees because of a protected characteristic.

Free Consultation — No Upfront Fees

Injured on Long Island?
We Fight for What You Deserve.

Serving Nassau County, Suffolk County, and all of New York City. You pay nothing unless we win.

The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has been fighting for the rights of injured New Yorkers since 2002. With over 24 years of experience handling personal injury, no-fault insurance, employment discrimination, and workers' compensation cases, Jason Tenenbaum brings the legal knowledge and courtroom experience your case demands. Every consultation is free and confidential, and we work on a contingency fee basis — meaning you pay absolutely nothing unless we recover compensation for you.

Available 24/7  ·  No fees unless you win  ·  Serving Long Island & NYC

Injured? Don't Wait.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation Today

No fees unless we win — available 24/7 for emergencies.

Call Now Free Review