Key Takeaway
New York Court guidance on business records exception under CPLR 4518 for Long Island and NYC practitioners handling personal injury and litigation cases.
Understanding the Business Records Exception: Essential Guidance for Long Island and New York City Practitioners
In the complex world of New York litigation, the admission of business records represents one of the most frequently encountered evidentiary challenges facing attorneys in Long Island and New York City courts. Whether you’re handling personal injury cases, commercial disputes, or medical malpractice claims, understanding the nuances of the business records exception under CPLR 4518 can make the difference between successfully proving your case and watching crucial evidence get excluded.
At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, we regularly encounter situations where the proper foundation for business records becomes the pivotal issue in cases throughout Nassau County, Suffolk County, and the five boroughs of New York City. The stakes are particularly high in personal injury and medical malpractice cases, where medical records, billing statements, and treatment documentation often form the backbone of both liability and damages claims.
The Critical Importance of Business Records in New York Litigation
Business records serve as the foundation for countless legal arguments across all areas of practice. In personal injury cases, medical records establish the extent of injuries and treatment. In commercial litigation, corporate documents prove business relationships and financial transactions. In employment law, personnel files and payroll records demonstrate wage violations or discriminatory practices.
However, the mere existence of these documents doesn’t guarantee their admissibility in court. New York’s evidence rules require that business records meet specific foundational requirements before they can be considered by a judge or jury. Understanding these requirements and how courts apply them in practice is essential for any attorney practicing in the New York metropolitan area.
CPLR 4518: The Business Records Exception Framework
CPLR 4518 provides the statutory framework for admitting business records in New York courts. This provision creates an exception to the hearsay rule, allowing certain business records to be admitted into evidence even though they might otherwise be considered inadmissible hearsay. However, the exception comes with specific requirements that must be satisfied.
The statute requires that business records be made in the regular course of business, at or near the time of the events they describe, and by someone with personal knowledge of the facts recorded or from information provided by such a person. Additionally, the party seeking to admit the records must establish the proper foundation through witness testimony or affidavit.
Court Guidance: Lessons from V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co.
The importance of proper foundation for business records is clearly illustrated in a case highlighted by attorney Jason Tenenbaum’s analysis:
V.S. Med. Servs., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co.
2009 NY Slip Op 50048(U) (App. Term 2d Dept. 2009)Plaintiff offered the testimony of its former employee and sought the admission of, inter alia, its purported claim forms into evidence. Defendant objected on the ground that said documents were hearsay and that plaintiff failed to lay a foundation for their admission pursuant to CPLR 4518.
While plaintiff produced a witness to testify regarding the claim forms plaintiff sought to have admitted into evidence, because said witness did not testify at all as to the generation of such claim forms, they were not admissible as business records
This case provides crucial guidance for practitioners: it’s not sufficient to simply produce a witness who is familiar with business records. The witness must be able to testify about how the records were actually created, maintained, and used in the regular course of business.
Common Foundation Problems in Long Island and NYC Practice
Insufficient Witness Knowledge
As demonstrated in the V.S. Med. Servs. case, one of the most common problems in establishing business records foundation is producing witnesses who lack sufficient knowledge about how the records were created. This is particularly problematic in medical malpractice and personal injury cases where medical records may be old, or the personnel who created them are no longer available.
Missing Chain of Custody
In commercial litigation and employment disputes, business records often change hands multiple times before reaching court. Establishing a clear chain of custody and demonstrating that records haven’t been altered becomes crucial for admission.
Inadequate Authentication
Courts require clear evidence that business records are what they purport to be. This means establishing not only who created the records but also the systems and procedures used to maintain their accuracy and reliability.
Strategic Applications Across Practice Areas
Personal Injury Cases
In personal injury litigation throughout Long Island and New York City, medical records form the foundation of damages claims. Proper foundation requires testimony from medical records custodians who can explain the hospital’s or practice’s procedures for creating, maintaining, and storing patient records.
Key considerations include establishing that records were made contemporaneously with treatment, that healthcare providers had personal knowledge of the information recorded, and that the records were kept in the regular course of business according to standard medical practice.
Commercial Litigation
Business disputes often involve financial records, contracts, correspondence, and other corporate documents. Foundation requirements include establishing the company’s record-keeping procedures, demonstrating that documents were created and maintained in the regular course of business, and showing that the witness has sufficient knowledge of the company’s operations.
Employment Law
Employment litigation frequently involves personnel files, payroll records, and company policies. Proper foundation requires testimony about the employer’s human resources procedures, including how employee records are created, maintained, and updated.
Medical Malpractice
Medical malpractice cases present unique challenges for business records foundation, particularly when dealing with multiple healthcare providers, electronic medical records systems, and complex treatment histories. Practitioners must be prepared to address issues related to record completeness, contemporaneous creation, and the qualifications of witness testimony.
Best Practices for Establishing Business Records Foundation
Identify the Right Witness
The most critical step in establishing business records foundation is identifying a witness who has sufficient knowledge about how the records were created and maintained. This person should understand the business’s record-keeping procedures and be able to explain how the specific documents at issue fit within those procedures.
Prepare Comprehensive Testimony
Witnesses should be prepared to testify about the complete process of record creation, including who creates records, when they’re created, what information they contain, how accuracy is ensured, and how records are stored and maintained.
Address Electronic Records Issues
With the increasing prevalence of electronic record-keeping systems, practitioners must be prepared to address issues specific to digital records, including system security, backup procedures, and the ability to generate accurate printouts or exports.
Anticipate Authentication Challenges
Be prepared to address questions about record completeness, alterations, and the reliability of the business’s record-keeping systems. This may require testimony about quality control procedures and system safeguards.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Assuming Familiarity Equals Foundation
As the V.S. Med. Servs. case illustrates, simply producing a witness who is familiar with records isn’t sufficient. The witness must have knowledge about how the records were actually created and maintained.
Overlooking Generation Testimony
Courts require specific testimony about how records were generated, not just testimony about what they contain or how they’re used.
Inadequate Advance Preparation
Business records foundation often requires coordination with records custodians, IT personnel, and other business representatives. Waiting until the last minute to secure proper foundation testimony can result in exclusion of crucial evidence.
Ignoring Opposing Counsel’s Objections
Defense attorneys often raise foundation objections to business records. Plaintiffs’ counsel should anticipate these challenges and be prepared with comprehensive foundation testimony that addresses likely objections.
Frequently Asked Questions About Business Records Foundation
Q: Can I establish business records foundation through affidavit instead of live testimony?
A: Yes, CPLR 4518 permits foundation to be established through affidavit, but the affiant must have the same level of knowledge about record creation and maintenance that would be required for live testimony.
Q: What if the person who created the records is no longer available?
A: You can still establish foundation through another witness who has knowledge of the business’s record-keeping procedures and can explain how the specific records were created within those procedures.
Q: How do I handle electronic records that have been printed or exported?
A: You’ll need testimony about the electronic system’s reliability, the accuracy of printouts or exports, and the procedures used to generate the documents you’re seeking to admit.
Q: Can I use the same foundation witness for multiple types of business records?
A: Yes, if the witness has knowledge about the creation and maintenance of all the different types of records you’re seeking to admit. However, the witness must be able to testify specifically about each type of record.
Q: What should I do if the opposing side challenges my business records foundation?
A: Be prepared to provide additional testimony or documentation about your record-keeping procedures. The key is demonstrating that your records meet all the requirements of CPLR 4518.
The Broader Implications for Evidence Strategy
The business records exception represents just one aspect of a comprehensive evidence strategy. However, its importance cannot be overstated, particularly in cases where business records form the foundation for key arguments about liability, causation, or damages.
Courts in Long Island and New York City see countless cases where proper business records foundation makes the difference between success and failure. Attorneys who master the requirements of CPLR 4518 and understand how to present compelling foundation testimony will find themselves better positioned to achieve favorable outcomes for their clients.
Working with Experienced Legal Counsel
Establishing proper foundation for business records requires not only understanding the legal requirements but also practical knowledge of how different industries create and maintain records. This expertise is particularly important in complex cases involving multiple parties, extensive documentation, or technical record-keeping systems.
At the Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, we have extensive experience working with business records across a wide range of practice areas. Our approach combines thorough knowledge of CPLR 4518’s requirements with practical understanding of how courts in Nassau County, Suffolk County, and New York City evaluate foundation testimony.
We work closely with clients to identify the right witnesses, prepare comprehensive foundation testimony, and anticipate potential challenges from opposing counsel. Our goal is to ensure that crucial business records are admitted into evidence and can support our clients’ legal arguments.
Conclusion: Foundation as the Key to Success
The business records exception under CPLR 4518 provides a powerful tool for admitting crucial evidence in New York litigation. However, as the V.S. Med. Servs. case demonstrates, the exception’s requirements must be taken seriously and satisfied completely.
The key lesson for practitioners is that familiarity with business records is not enough – witnesses must be able to testify specifically about how records were generated and maintained in the regular course of business. This requirement applies whether you’re dealing with medical records in a personal injury case, financial documents in a commercial dispute, or personnel files in an employment matter.
Success with business records foundation requires advance planning, careful witness preparation, and thorough understanding of the specific record-keeping procedures involved in your case. Attorneys who master these skills will find themselves better equipped to present compelling evidence and achieve favorable outcomes for their clients.
If you’re facing challenges with business records foundation or need assistance developing evidence strategies for your case, don’t let technical requirements undermine your clients’ interests. Contact our office at 516-750-0595 to discuss how we can help you establish proper foundation for crucial business records and strengthen your case presentation.
The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Business records foundation requirements can vary depending on the specific facts and circumstances of each case, as well as the particular records involved. Always consult with qualified legal counsel before making decisions about evidence strategy and witness preparation.
Related Articles
- Third-party billing records in no-fault claims following Carothers decision
- Pine Hollow decision’s impact on business records rule in personal injury cases
- Comprehensive guide to CPLR 4518(a) business records requirements
- Prima facie case establishment and Appellate Term interpretations
- New York No-Fault Insurance Law
Legal Update (February 2026): Since this 2009 post, CPLR 4518 and its implementing regulations may have been subject to amendments affecting foundation requirements, authentication procedures, or admissibility standards for business records. Practitioners should verify current provisions of CPLR 4518 and consult recent case law interpreting the business records exception, as evidentiary standards and procedural requirements may have evolved over the intervening years.
