MVAIC created issue of fact
May 20, 2016 No Comments
VS Care Acupuncture, PC v MVAIC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50764(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2016) “Our review of the record indicates that defendant failed to eliminate all
VS Care Acupuncture, PC v MVAIC, 2016 NY Slip Op 50764(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2016) “Our review of the record indicates that defendant failed to eliminate all
Tam Med. Supply Corp. v Citiwide Auto Leasing, 2016 NY Slip Op 50748(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2016) “Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments on appeal, defendant established a proper
Natural Therapy Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51310(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) I often feel like this Plaintiff attorney
Hillside OpenMRI, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 2014 NY Slip Op 51143(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2014) With respect to the second cause of action, seeking to
Interboro Ins. Co. v Clennon, 2014 NY Slip Op 00092 (2d Dept. 2014) While of course I am happy to have won, and, in addition, I
Ortho Prods. & Equip., Inc. v Interboro Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52054(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “It further established that its EUO scheduling letters
Olmeur Med., P.C. v Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52031(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) “In support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant
Eagle Surgical Supply, Inc. v Allstate Indem. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 52012(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (1) “Plaintiff’s main argument on appeal is that defendant was
Megacure Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51994(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) (1) “We note that defendant’s February 13, 2007 letter purporting to
Praetorian v. Mercado, Index #: 303993/12 (Sup. Ct. Bx. Co. 2013) In this declaratory judgment action, an Alrof argument was made; an electronic signature argument was
American Transit v. Chedister , Index #: 301921/12 (Sup. Ct. Bronx Co. 2013) Supreme Court could not be anymore emphatic that it is not impressed with the
Mr. Five Boro took at dive in the IME no-show DJ matter of American Transit Ins. Co. v. Beltre, under Bronx Co. Index #: 310468/11 (Sup.
Superior Oxygen & Ortho Supplies, Ltd. v Auto One Ins. Co., 2012 NY Slip Op 50348(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2012) “defendant failed to establish that the
I liked that title, but it is not necessarily true. It is an embellishment at best, and if you clicked on it, then it did the
Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51455(U)(App.Term 2d Dept. 2010) You have seem this before. “Contrary to the Civil
Points of Health Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51338(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) Part I: “[c]ontrary to the finding of the
Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Progressive Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 51334(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “To raise a triable issue of fact based on
St. Vincent Med. Care, P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co., 2010 NY Slip Op 50446(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2010) “While defendant properly argues that an EUO need
The Appellate Term, Second Department seems to be all over the place with the “EUO” cases. The analysis is really needlessly strained and hard to follow.
