MVAIC created issue of fact
MVAIC's contradictory evidence about notice of claim filing created triable issues, demonstrating why defendants shouldn't introduce conflicting proof in no-fault cases.
Read More →Timliness of requests
15 articles by Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.
General Construction Law applies (again)
Court confirms General Construction Law timing rules apply to no-fault denials, emphasizing proper mailing procedures and calculation of deadlines in insurance disputes.
Read More →
EUO no-show defense sustained
Natural Therapy Acupuncture v State Farm: Court sustains EUO no-show defense, reinforcing insurer burden of proof for scheduling letters and attorney presence.
Read More →
When a delay letter is not good enough
Court rules delay letters requesting EUO without verification insufficient to toll 30-day payment deadline in NY no-fault insurance cases - key requirements explored.
Read More →
So what did the Second Department mean?
Second Department's Interboro v Clennon decision analysis on no-fault EUO compliance and material breach standards for Long Island personal injury attorneys.
Read More →
Personal knowledge is well not too personal
Court ruling clarifies personal knowledge requirements for proving EUO no-shows in no-fault insurance cases, emphasizing detailed business practice affidavits.
Read More →
EUO no-show mailing and personal knowledge substantiated
Court ruling confirms that proper mailing procedures and attorney's personal knowledge can establish EUO no-shows, setting important precedent for no-fault insurance disputes.
Read More →
EUO tolling and reasonableness issues
Eagle Surgical Supply v Allstate case analysis on EUO scheduling timeliness, tolling effects, and reasonableness standards in New York no-fault insurance law.
Read More →
EUO preclusion and EBT’s based upon preserved box #18 defense
New York court ruling on EUO preclusion and EBT rights based on preserved box 18 defense in no-fault insurance cases - key timing requirements explained.
Read More →
A lesson on why the failure to attempt a DJ on an EUO no-show can spell doom
A 2012 case highlights how insurance companies must properly establish EUO scheduling to avoid losing their right to deny claims based on no-shows.
Read More →
EUO letters were mailed and the Claimant failed to attend the EUO: summary judgment granted
New York court grants summary judgment when claimant fails to attend properly scheduled EUO after timely mailing of scheduling letters established proper notice.
Read More →
EUO no-show (case #3)
Long Island court case analysis: Points of Health v Lancer Insurance on EUO scheduling letters, timely mailing procedures, and no-fault claim denial defenses.
Read More →
EUO no-show (case #2)
Court ruling on EUO no-show defense requirements in NY no-fault cases, emphasizing timely scheduling letters and proper affidavits to toll claim periods.
Read More →
EUO Scheduling Letters Must Be Sent Within the Same Time Frame That Exists for Verifying Bills: A Comprehensive Guide for Long Island and NYC Providers
Master EUO scheduling timing requirements for Long Island and NYC providers. Avoid costly billing delays with expert legal guidance. Call 516-750-0595 for compliance support.
Read More →
Validity of EUO, Appellate Term, 2d Dept: Take two
Expert analysis of EUO validity issues in NY insurance law. Long Island insurance attorney Jason Tenenbaum explains appellate decisions. Call 516-750-0595.
Read More →