Blog

Category: Propriety of the examination

Popular Categories

Procedural Issues (203)

Coverage (160)

EUO issues (207)

Evidence (137)

Fee Schedule (127)

Medical Necessity (184)

Additional Verification (95)

IME issues (161)

Medical provider needs to prove that Assignor was represented by counsel and that counsel failed to receive notification of IME

December 5, 2013 No Comments

American Tr. Ins. Co. v Leon, 2013 NY Slip Op 08124 (1st Dept. 2013) The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C., Garden City (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel),

Medical provider cannot defeat IME non-cooperation defense through stating “discovery is outstanding”

September 2, 2013 No Comments

South Nassau Community Hosp. v Kemper Independence Ins. Co., 2013 NY Slip Op 51384(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2013) In support of its motion for summary judgment, defendant

Objective criterian is not necessary prior to seeking an IME

April 16, 2011 1 Comment

All County, LLC v Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co., 2011 NY Slip Op 50621(U)(App. Term 2d Dept. 2011) “We note that, contrary to the finding of the

The performance of diagnostic testing as part of an IME

November 28, 2009 No Comments

I could definitely see situations where it might be appropriate for an insurance carrier, as part of an IME, to demand that a claimant undergo a

Practice Areas

Support

About Us

The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information and may not be applicable in your jurisdiction.